- Joined
- Dec 29, 2016
- Messages
- 754
So, a while back when i was looking at what paper to get, i heard these two talked about in comparable terms. I've seen over and over that they are "pretty much the same" and that norton is better on more abrasive resistant material.
I've heard people on podcasts and stuff mention that they sand the more intense stuff like 3V etc with Norton because it cuts better. I believe the site i was already ordering belts from had the norton, so i decided to grab some. They also had the grit packs which allowed me to pick up a medium and fine pack.
After using all the 220 that came in that pack, i decided it was time to purchase some Rhynowet.
Here is my review after testing the Rhynowet tonight.
The norton is not even in the same category. If someone tells you they are close, or even similar, they haven't used both extensively. The norton produces a much finer scratch, isn't as abrasive, creates a more milky look, and as you sand, it is SUPER easy to see scratches. The product does not last though. A few passes and you have to move your paper. The result is like a much more milky result. i'll break it down into some pros/cons.
Norton Pros:
- Easy to see scratch pattern as you climb, stray scratches / any variation is very obvious to spot, and doesn't take looking from multiple angles / lighting. The finish is very uniform, and SUPER soft in comparison to rhynowet.
- Does well on hardened steel - but after comparing it to rhynowet, it comes no where close. Rhynowet gets 3x 4x the life, it doesn't feel like all the abrasives fall out, where as norton instantly after a couple passes feels flat and like it's doing nothing.
Norton Cons:
- BURN through paper.
- As you climb grits - it becomes increasingly hard to get a very uniform finish, and inconsistencies are very hard to get out. This could be inexperience, but it wasn't the same when using Rhynowet.
- Price.
Rhynowet Pros:
- This shit was designed to melt through hardened metal. Blows through sanding scratches, going from a belt to 220 grit you murder through sanding. EDM stones were literally the only way to grit progress with the norton, and even then, you'd have to use paper for hours to remove the 220 / 400 / 600 edm scratches. I don't think i'll have ANY issues melting everything together with this, and it won't take hours and multiple pieces of paper.
- Feels like the "right tool for the job" so to speak, design was intended for this. Creates a much SHINIER and rougher cut (no, this phenomenon that i'm explaining has nothing to do with grits either. I went over a 220 finish that i did with Norton, and it looked 10x different).
- Blends and creates a very straight and uniform finish WAY easier. Finishing passes actually take out issues/ j-hooks / etc quick.
*This paper is obviously much more coarse than the norton, but i struggled even when jumping from 320-400 with norton. Scratches are not easy, and you melt through paper and time when trying to climb the grits.*
Rhynowet Cons:
- This finish HIDES everything, and if you don't know where your scratches are, i can see shit being missed VERY easy using this paper. (I had a blade sanded to 220 using norton, and was working out like 10 scratches, most of them on the plunge line. I started using the Rhynowet and it completely changed the finish, and was removing scratches WAY faster, but if i didn't know where i was looking and what i was looking for i could be fooled IN THE SAME LIGHTING that they were completely removed, and they weren't. I found myself having to hunt for them, and change angles / lighting much more frequently, where norton is was CAKE to tell your progress so to speak).
I felt this was a needed write up, given my experience, etc. Let me know if you have questions and i'll answer. I foresee myself spending 3 times less time hand sanding, and when i get my disk sander, this is going to SPEED the process up even that much more. I do see myself occasionally missing scratches though with the rhynowet, it's a hard thing to explain but i've tried my best.
Proof i have both, and that i've used up pretty much most of my medium pack of the norton.
I've heard people on podcasts and stuff mention that they sand the more intense stuff like 3V etc with Norton because it cuts better. I believe the site i was already ordering belts from had the norton, so i decided to grab some. They also had the grit packs which allowed me to pick up a medium and fine pack.
After using all the 220 that came in that pack, i decided it was time to purchase some Rhynowet.
Here is my review after testing the Rhynowet tonight.
The norton is not even in the same category. If someone tells you they are close, or even similar, they haven't used both extensively. The norton produces a much finer scratch, isn't as abrasive, creates a more milky look, and as you sand, it is SUPER easy to see scratches. The product does not last though. A few passes and you have to move your paper. The result is like a much more milky result. i'll break it down into some pros/cons.
Norton Pros:
- Easy to see scratch pattern as you climb, stray scratches / any variation is very obvious to spot, and doesn't take looking from multiple angles / lighting. The finish is very uniform, and SUPER soft in comparison to rhynowet.
- Does well on hardened steel - but after comparing it to rhynowet, it comes no where close. Rhynowet gets 3x 4x the life, it doesn't feel like all the abrasives fall out, where as norton instantly after a couple passes feels flat and like it's doing nothing.
Norton Cons:
- BURN through paper.
- As you climb grits - it becomes increasingly hard to get a very uniform finish, and inconsistencies are very hard to get out. This could be inexperience, but it wasn't the same when using Rhynowet.
- Price.
Rhynowet Pros:
- This shit was designed to melt through hardened metal. Blows through sanding scratches, going from a belt to 220 grit you murder through sanding. EDM stones were literally the only way to grit progress with the norton, and even then, you'd have to use paper for hours to remove the 220 / 400 / 600 edm scratches. I don't think i'll have ANY issues melting everything together with this, and it won't take hours and multiple pieces of paper.
- Feels like the "right tool for the job" so to speak, design was intended for this. Creates a much SHINIER and rougher cut (no, this phenomenon that i'm explaining has nothing to do with grits either. I went over a 220 finish that i did with Norton, and it looked 10x different).
- Blends and creates a very straight and uniform finish WAY easier. Finishing passes actually take out issues/ j-hooks / etc quick.
*This paper is obviously much more coarse than the norton, but i struggled even when jumping from 320-400 with norton. Scratches are not easy, and you melt through paper and time when trying to climb the grits.*
Rhynowet Cons:
- This finish HIDES everything, and if you don't know where your scratches are, i can see shit being missed VERY easy using this paper. (I had a blade sanded to 220 using norton, and was working out like 10 scratches, most of them on the plunge line. I started using the Rhynowet and it completely changed the finish, and was removing scratches WAY faster, but if i didn't know where i was looking and what i was looking for i could be fooled IN THE SAME LIGHTING that they were completely removed, and they weren't. I found myself having to hunt for them, and change angles / lighting much more frequently, where norton is was CAKE to tell your progress so to speak).
I felt this was a needed write up, given my experience, etc. Let me know if you have questions and i'll answer. I foresee myself spending 3 times less time hand sanding, and when i get my disk sander, this is going to SPEED the process up even that much more. I do see myself occasionally missing scratches though with the rhynowet, it's a hard thing to explain but i've tried my best.
Proof i have both, and that i've used up pretty much most of my medium pack of the norton.
