2003-CA-001260
BUCKINGHAM, J.
AFFIRMING
Date: 5/14/2004
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WHITE V. COM.
CRIMINAL - Crimes (Concealed weapons)
White, Jr., appeals conviction for misdemeanor crime of carrying a concealed deadly weapon and sentencing him to 30 days in jail. Affirmed.
"Nine knives were found in a search of Whites automobile. A multi-tool with a knife blade was found in his right rear pocket. A butterfly knife and a lockblade tactical knife were found under the front drivers seat. A tactical knife with a seven-inch blade was found wedged between the front seat and console. A dagger was found unsheathed in the rear of the vehicle. Four additional lockblade tactical knives, one with a curved blade, were found in the center console.
There was sufficient evidence for the jury to determine that each of the three knives in question were not ordinary pocket knives or hunting knives but were deadly weapons. Similarly, the evidence was sufficient as to the expandable baton...
"Having reviewed the evidence, we conclude that the Commonwealths evidence in connection with three of the knives and the expandable baton was sufficient to overcome Whites directed verdict motion. These three knives are the butterflyknife, the lockblade tactical knife that could be opened with one hand, and the tactical knife with the seven-inch blade.
"As we have noted, the term 'deadly weapon' includes any knife other than an ordinary pocket knife or hunting knife. See KRS 500.080(4)(c). The statute also indicates a 'illy,nightstick, or club' falls within the definition of 'deadly weapon.' See KRS 500.080(4)(d).
"In Asher v. Commonwealth, Ky.,473 S.W.2d 145 (1971), the court upheld a conviction for carrying a concealed deadly weapon where the trial court instructed the jury that a butcher knife with a sharp-pointed blade approximately six inches in length was a deadly weapon. Id. at 146. In Williams v. Commonwealth, 304 Ky. 761, 202S.W.2d 408 (1947), a conviction for carrying a concealed deadly weapon was upheld on appeal where the trial court determined that a razor was a deadly weapon and did not submit the issue to a jury. 202 S.W.2d at 409.
"We conclude that the evidence was sufficient in this case for the jury to determine that each of the three knives in question were not ordinary pocket knives or hunting knives but were deadly weapons. Similarly, we conclude the evidence was sufficient as to the expandable baton. We also conclude that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to believe that the knives and expandable baton wereconcealed and were 'on or about [Whites] person.' A review of the testimony indicates that both the butterfly knife and a lockblade tactical knife that could be opened with one hand were under the front drivers seat. In addition, the tactical knife with a seven-inch blade was wedged between the front seat and console. Finally, the expandable baton, which could be extended with a flick of the wrist, was under the front drivers seat.
"In Delk v. Commonwealth, Ky. 344 S.W.2d 832 (1961), the court held that '[t]he concealment must be such as to prevent persons from seeing the weapon whose vision is not obscured by the carriers person or by anything other than the covering used to conceal it.' Id. at 833. In Prince v.Commonwealth, Ky. 277 S.W.2d 470 (1955), the court stated that a weapon is concealed when it is placed in a manner that it cannot readily be seen under ordinary observation. Id. at 472.
"The three knives in question and the expandable baton were clearly concealed. Finally, the knives in question and the expandable baton were concealed on or about Whites person. To be concealed 'on or about his person' means that the items must be 'concealed in such proximity to the person as to be convenient of access and within immediate physical reach.' Collier v. Commonwealth, Ky., 453 S.W.2d 600, 601 (1970). In that case, a conviction for carrying a concealed deadly weapon was upheld when a pistol was found on the floor under the front seat of a car being driven by the defendant. Id. As two of the knives and the expandable baton were found under the front seat and the other knife was found between the front seat and console, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to determine that the knives and the expandable baton were on or about Whites person. Given the evidence presented concerning three of the knives in question and the expandable baton, we simply cannot find it clearly unreasonable for the jury to have found guilt in this case. The judgment of the Fayette Circuit Court is affirmed. ALL CONCUR.