Osprey Talon 22- first impressions

Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
2,656
I was looking for a daypack that had enough volume for winter snowshoeing and long summer day hikes (long enough where there's chance a guy might get caught out)- somewhere in the 20-25 liter range. I wanted a pack that wasn't a one size fit all, adjustable would be a plus. Hydration bladder friendly. Some organization options would be welcomed. I wanted it light, but still tough enough for off trail excursions. I've been very impressed with my Osprey Exos that I use for backpacking, so when the choices got narrowed down- I was pretty confident the quality in the Talon would be top notch.

The Talon 22 comes in two sizes S/M and M/L- based on torso length. Within each of those sizes you still have significant room to adjust the overall length. The Talon was one of the lightest I looked at, the M/L weighing in at 29 oz.

overall pic

front22.jpg


pic of the adjustable suspension

adjsuspension.jpg


the sternum strap also has three adjustments and includes a whistle into the clip

sternumstrap.jpg


both the hip belt and shoulder straps incorporate a neat setup where there is no leftover hanging straps- I've never seen that setup before, but a great idea- nothing worse than a bunch of hanging straps getting in the way and caught up on things

hipbelt.jpg


it's got two very voluminous hip belt pockets- this is a feature I really appreciate (my Exos has the same setup) I keep my camera on one side and the other holds a couple of cliff bars and some sunscreen, plenty of room for those little odds and ends you want handy

lefthipocket.jpg


righthipocket.jpg


the bladder compartment is large and could easily swallow 100+ oz bladder- it has a loop w/ a clip to hang the bladder, it also had a neat "secret" compartment as well- you can see the load lifter straps as well- a feature few small packs have

extrahydrationpocket.jpg


the top pocket is a rather large mesh pocket for items you want kept separately from the main pack, also has a key clip- I'd estimate the pocket as ~ 300 cubic inches

toppocket.jpg


each shoulder strap has a small lycra pocket- just happens to be the exact size needed for my Garmin Foretrex :)

strappocket.jpg


the main compartment is voluminous- pic doesn't do it justice, it also has a small velcro'd pocket for items that you want more handy

maininterior.jpg


the front of the pack (see first pic) has a nice lycra mesh expandable pocket- nice for a rain jacket, pack rod, small snow shovel, etc

sides each have lycra water bottle pockets, there are also compression straps on each side

thus far it appears I've made the right choice :)
 
Thanks for the review...I'm in the market for a new pack.
Osprey is on my list to try out.
 
definitely worth peeking at :)

I was so impressed w/ the Talon 22, I ended ordering a Talon 5.5 for really light pursuits
 
I saw a Youtube overview of that exact model I believe. I was thoroughly impressed at how well-thought out its design was. Your pics seem only to confirm it.
 
Thanks for posting your review! I am a new Osprey owner and have been impressed with the design so far. :)
 
mtwarden, that was great review, I am not sure how i missed this one you did.
Thanks for posting the youtube link too. That was neat.

Bryan
 
Bryan- it's been a great pack, I've used it a bunch this past winter for snowshoe trips- for such a small pack it really swallows the gear up; also ride very comfortably

loaded for a snowshoe trip, the stretch pocket is perfect for a small snow shovel

loaded-1.jpg


paandbeeve.jpg
 
I have the same pack but use the Camelbak Alpine explorer for snowshoeing. I can attach the snow shoes, ice axe, sit pad and snow shoe extensions easily to it.

I use the Talon for spring/summer/fall backpacking. It is a very good pack.
 
The only thing I didn't like about the Ospreys was the hip belt and buckle didn't seem as substantial as some other bags. I like the weight to rest on my hips and stabilized by my shoulders. Do the Osprey packs in the smaller range (up to 22L - 35L) do that?
 
The only thing I didn't like about the Ospreys was the hip belt and buckle didn't seem as substantial as some other bags. I like the weight to rest on my hips and stabilized by my shoulders. Do the Osprey packs in the smaller range (up to 22L - 35L) do that?

the hip belt is comfortable, but it's definitely on the minimal side- w/ under 20 lbs (I wouldn't recommend much more than that for these smaller packs) it carries very comfortably

my Exos 46 has a similar hipbelt setup- looks minimal, but actually is quite comfortable- have had loads over 35# w/ it w/ no issues whatsoever
 
The only thing I didn't like about the Ospreys was the hip belt and buckle didn't seem as substantial as some other bags. I like the weight to rest on my hips and stabilized by my shoulders. Do the Osprey packs in the smaller range (up to 22L - 35L) do that?

Ive got a Osprey Stratos 34 and its got a pretty good hipbelt that performs as it should, ie. it transfers the weight to your hips.
 
^ agreed, I think part of it is folks are used to seeing 2" thick monster waist belts and equate that w/ comfort, they see the rather diminutive looking Osprey waist belts and dismiss them w/o giving them a try, for hauling out 90 # elk quarters you want a very substantive belt (and a very good frame!), but for typical backpacking weights it's simply not needed
 
As to the waist belt, take a look at the where the weight rests on you. For me, the weight tends to fall on the top of my butt - I don't have a big one either or lower back. It is comfortable for me. So the size of the waist belt doesn't make that much difference. With the Osprey 22 you shouldn't be carrying that much weight anyway. Basically, the waist belt should help keep the weight off your shoulders.
 
Back
Top