I have to ageree with Mr. Ostov on this one.
You wear battle dress or a company uniform, you carry state of the art automatic weapons, and the expectation is that hostiles will treat you in a fashion differently than they would members of the armed forces sent by this nation.?
While their deaths are as regretable as any, (one of the victims leaves a sadly widowed wife and children scant miles from me), I do not view these particular individuals deaths as any different than those who have suffered a similar fate in the employ of the armed forces of this government. These individuals were mercenaries, a privately contracted military force that happened to be hired by interests that coincide with the interests of the official miltary forces of this nation.
I grieve their deaths the same as I do those in that chose to remain in the armed forces and chose to not become mercenaries.
However, to try and make some big noise that these folks were "civilians" and thus subject to a special dispenstation by the enemy is absurd. I doubt that many of them themselves could make the distinction, just as the enemy Iraqis could not. In this case it is an exceedingly fine difference.
If we are to believe what we are told, the job of the US military and that of outside "contractors" is the same.
To expect that those who oppose the actions of the US military will treat privately hired contractors attempting to perform the same job, in the same fashion is, to be flippant, VERY DUMB. Especially when they look the same, and behave the same.
I am glad that the US military did not recklessly take the despicable bait offered and are thinking about the response, because I think the whole set-up is a trap. It didn't really matter exactly whether the bait was "contractors" or servicemen.