We've had a few folks in threads recently mention dangers of inhaling diamond particulate, especially when using them dry. I think there is also some risk of working with silicon carbide. The key dangers being skin contact with a probable carcinogen, or inhalation of crystalline silica that could damage your lungs.
Some states in the US, NJ is one example, list silicon carbide as a hazardous substance. Of course it's possible they could be overreacting and over-regulating as some states are known to do. Or, they could be on to something, as the science suggests some risk, and perhaps we need to be cautious around these materials. I honestly don't know, not a medical researcher. I'm also not usually a reactionary, and definitely not a "dandelion eating tree hugger" type either.
But this seems real, if you browse the sources below. Note that in the NJ suggested guidelines, they offer a lot of suggestions like avoiding skin contact, inhalation, contact with eyes, avoiding eating in the work area around SiC, handwashing and washing clothes carefully after use, etc. It's odd, I have read similar types of guidelines for folks who do a lot of shooting, especially at indoor ranges, to minimize lead exposure. I follow those precautions and urge others to at my range where I am an NRA certified range officer. Many shooters I know have scorned this, for years, and then a guy I know personally who's an instructor of frequent pistol training classes, himself, learned he had serious and prolonged lead exposure from years of working in indoor ranges with poor ventilation and poor 'lead hygiene' practices. And some workers at a local pistol range who were removing accumulated lead got seriously ill for exactly the same reasons.
A few interesting resources I ran across on the risks of working with SiC:
Some states in the US, NJ is one example, list silicon carbide as a hazardous substance. Of course it's possible they could be overreacting and over-regulating as some states are known to do. Or, they could be on to something, as the science suggests some risk, and perhaps we need to be cautious around these materials. I honestly don't know, not a medical researcher. I'm also not usually a reactionary, and definitely not a "dandelion eating tree hugger" type either.

A few interesting resources I ran across on the risks of working with SiC:
- Article summarizing increased cancer risks to people who work with SiC that was manufactured with the traditional "Acheson" process (which, for example, Norton uses): https://www.bna.com/silicon-carbide-cause-n17179910853/.
- Norton/Saint-Gobain article indicating that they use the Acheson manufacturing process for Sic: https://www.sic.saint-gobain.com/about-us/silicon-carbide-production-process
- NCBI review of epidemiological studies on the risks of Sic: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628329
- American Journal of Epidemiology article on a study about Norwegian SiC industry workers: https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/153/10/978/120989
- NJ state hazardous substance summary and guidelines on silicon carbide: http://nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/1658.pdf
- American cancer society lists SiC as a "probable carcinogen": https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/general-info/known-and-probable-human-carcinogens.html
- Oregon Osha guidelines lists some practical steps for reducing exposure: http://osha.oregon.gov/OSHAPubs/3301.pdf
- Toxnet summary of SiC as "suspected human carcinogen" (as noted in some of the above reviews of studies and American Cancer society list, this link is not 'proven' at this time, it is a 'probable carcinogen' at this point): https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search2/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@rn+409-21-2
Last edited: