jrawk
Well it seems we can argue about modern names for blades for days, because point of fact is that we can find many straight edge reverse tantos (to
B
brownshoe
's point), just as we can find curved edge sheepsfoot blades.
Misplaced Hillbilly
demonstrated that "wharnecliff" in modern knives is a fairly abused term for blade shape.
I mean, the kayak boasts 2 "reverse tantos", one with a curved edge and the other not, so if we're going by what SMKW calls them, then we're looking at two things that supposedly define the style.
These conversations always, sadly, degrade to this because just as soon as someone says something like "there's no such thing as a clip-less clip point" someone can find an example of someone who's made one. I'm not so sure we should use that criteria, since legitimacy is all-inclusive.
If the community feels that definitions are a silly way to go with these types of knife discussions, that's fine too- it just makes things more subjective, which is more boring.
To your other point, JRawk, if GEC made these knives they would definitely not look like this. You pay for what you get, and there's something lacking in these designs that GEC would not be over-looking. I'm sure some of these knives will sell, I even considered it, I just don't see these reaching "viper"/"grinling whittler"/"TC Barlow"/"77 Barlow" status. I think you're right that there would be less skepticism if it was an established brand like GEC; point of origin alone would get more takers. However in my opinion there would still be a discussion caused by the design of the Kayak. This isn't your typical "I wish I had a clip/spear/sheepsfoot/wharncliff instead of the clip/spear/sheepsfoot/wharncliff they put on there" type of discussion.
Regardless, can we agree that the it's super weird that the secondary blade is more beefy than the primary? Either that or the beefier one is the primary and breaks the typical expectation by being on the pile side.
Ultimately it looks like a lot of knife for relatively small blades.