Scandinavian Forest Axe from Gransfors Bruks

Cliff Stamp

BANNED
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
17,562
This axe has a 2 lbs head with 3.5 inch face and a 25 inch handle. It is a traditional limbing axe, with enough reach to allow a clean sweep of a felled tree and enough heft to allow good power without generating excessive fatigue. Like all the Gransfors Bruks axes, this one is hand forged and has not been excessively polished or painted to "clean up" the forging. It is made of Swedish steel, most likely something like L6, and hardened to around 57 RC, just at the point where it can be filed.

Concerning balance, as Jimbo noted awhile ago this is just about perfect. It is center head balanced, which means if suspended upside down the head will true right to the center of the handle. The center of mass of the axe is also right below the head, perfect for the traditional two handed swing. The axe goes weightless as your power hand slips up the handle and as you sweep back down the center of balance rushes out and you can thus generate a large amount of power without always having to swing such a head heavy axe.

The handle has perfect vertical grain and is shaped to allow comfort even under very heavy hits. There is one small fault in the wood however. About midpoint up the handle there is a very small knot, about 1 mm in diameter, about 5 mm in from the edge of the handle. Not something that I would let pass if I was picking out the axe, will see how it goes in use. It is a small knot, and surrounded by strong wood. I don't foresee major problems. It would be more serious if it was just under the head.

The edge, like all Bruks axes comes nice and thin, with a high polish. However this one has a spot that is slightly marred. It is dented in and strongly reflects light. It looks like the edge was scraped off of a piece of hardened metal right after sharpening. Using a smooth steel I aligned the edge in that area (about 1.5 cm long) with about 20 light passes per side. Once I was finished you could just barely see light reflecting off of the edge.

Doing a simple check on push cutting sharpness, cutting light thread, I was surprised by how sharp the axe was near the toe of the bit. It would cut the thread repeatedly with just the barest hit of pressure, needing about 30 g of force to make a cut, this is at the same level of a razor blade. For reference, a well finished "shaving sharp" production knife will take about 100 g or so to cut the thread. However near the heel of the bit, the Bruks axe was not nearly as sharp taking about 175 g to make a cut, this is "hair scraping sharp". The damaged area after I steeled it needed about ~300 g. As a check of slicing sharpness I cut 1/4 inch poly under a 1000 g load. The edge took from 0.5 cm to 1.8 cm to cut through the poly. Thus parts of the edge were very sharp, as sharp or sharper as any production or custom knives, while other parts were significantly behind.

Moving beyond simple sharpness, I used the heel of the axe to do a rocking push cut through 3/8 inch poly. The axe cut through the rope with ease, biting it very strongly it was able to make complete cuts with 36 +/- 4 lbs of force. For comparison, this is the same cutting ability of the large drop point Twistmaster from Cold Steel. If this seems surprising, you have to consider that even though the cross section of the axe head is quite large, the actual edge profile is very thin and acute. Specifically here is the actual geometry :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/gb_forest_edge.gif

This is to scale, the crosses are the points that I measured. The edge starts off with a bevel of around 16 degrees per side but very quickly sweeps back to under ten degrees and finally hits a relief of about 6 degrees right before the start of the hollow part of the head profile. Note this is significantly more acute than most modern knives and thus the axe will easily out cut them on shallow penetration work.

I look forward to trying this axe out in felling some small work and cleaning it up. I may even be able to get out this weekend. Note, some work on a strop, 10 passes per side on CrO loaded leather, solved the problem with the marred portion of the edge.

-Cliff
 
I've dropped a couple small trees (8-10" trunk) with this model and am amazed at how well it performs. When I talked with the folks at Gransfors they said that the smiths don't like making the larger American Felling Axes. They do it simply because Americans want them. They say that if you make an axe correctly, the SFA size is plenty large enough.
 
Yes, working with 6-7" class trees is extremely easy, it is akin to chopping through a 2x4 with a nice bowie. Going a bit larger onto 8-10" trees is just big enough to make you realize that you are doing some work. Limbing however is where this axe comes into its own, I didn't get much time this weekend but I did get to drop and clean up a dozen 6-7" trees. The axe flies through the limbs just sweeping them off. It is balanced well for light brush cuts with a grip under the head, two handed sweeping grips for slightly larger branches and of course a full swing for branches multiple inches thick.

In regards to felling, yes the power is quite high and you would want to be working on very large wood indeed to really want greater penetration. However I would greatly prefer a larger axe in order to leave a shorter stump, which is not critical for survival pruposes but does matter if you are clearing lots and such. You also can't just stick a larger handle on this axe because of balance issues. Jimbo has a very detailed commentary on such issues on his webpages. I will definately be picking up a felling axe after christmas.

-Cliff
 
Well, I must concede that despite the foregoing advice from GB, I went ahead and bought the double bit felling axe. I've only had the opportunity to drop a couple 8-10 inch trees with it. While the SFA would definitely have done a perfectly decent job, the big fella really makes the large chips fly and shortens the work. If you were using an axe on bigger timber, dropping a lot of 8-10 inchers or striving for small stumps (as you mentioned), then the felling axe would offer a clear advantage.
 
Thanks for another awesome review, Cliff!

Mine is about 2lbs 12oz total, as is my buddy's so I'm getting to think that the head is under 2lb. It sure is an awsome small axe though! We have some links on the other forum for Hults axes (see below) - and the better ones of those seem very similar to Gransfors, model for model. The heavy axe I have is their cheaper line - sold only in British Columbia. It would seem that the Swedish people have a thing about small axes. I'll definitely be getting the American Falling Axe, because we have a lot of larger trees here and a heavier axe is simply more efficient to use even limbing. That's more for work though. In general outdoor use I doubt that a better axe has ever been built than the SFA. If you took all of Mors Kochanski's recommendations from the "Bushcraft" book and built an axe it would be the SFA. The more I use one the more I find to like.

My SFA and carving axe had some edge imperfections - as did the hatchet. These are minor though and as Cliff reported easily fixed. Strangely with my SFA I noticed some slight sticking when cutting green alder trees. I guess a little polishing of the bevel is in order. My buddy's axe didn't show this. These axes take a pretty deep bite on trees, and with a little polishing work should take an even deeper bite without any sticking - so the little work should be well rewarded.

I won't really be happy until I've tried one of each of the Gransfors axes. What incredible tools!

The link for Hults axes is:
"Hults Bruk, now owned by a company called Hultafors AB, still makes axes. Both under their own name Hults bruk, and under the name Hultafors. They actually have a website at
www.hultafors.se
Unfortunatly they do not have an english version of the site, but I'll try to guide you to the axe section in the swedish version. Atleast you will get to see the pictures of the axes, and also will be able to read their weight and meassures.
Choose the swedish version of the site.
At the meny on the top you will see the option "Våra produkter" click that one.
Then you will get a meny on the left side too. There you choose "Yxor" (Yxor is the swedish word for axes) Now you can choose if you want to see the ones marketed under the name hults bruk, or hultafors.
I hope this is of some help. If not, please let me know and I'll see what else I can do.
As far as handforged axes, Gransfors is the most common brand at the stores around here. I know one store where they have handforged Wetterlings hatches about the same size as the "wildlife hatchet" by gransfors. The Wetterling is a bit cheaper. $35 as compared to $39 for the gransfors one. The quality seems to be a lil below the ones on the gransfors ones too.

I'll do some investigations about if there are any other handforged brands around.

/Bjorn "
 
Jimbo :

I'll definitely be getting the American Falling Axe, because we have a lot of larger trees here and a heavier axe is simply more efficient to use even limbing. That's more for work though. In general outdoor use I doubt that a better axe has ever been built than the SFA.

Yes, that mirrors my perspective exactly.

These axes take a pretty deep bite on trees, and with a little polishing work should take an even deeper bite without any sticking - so the little work should be well rewarded.

Along those lines I often wondered what the performance gain would be if you polished the whole head as is common in competition. I have experiemented with this in the past by well lubricating various knives and axes but could not see a difference. I definately didn't notice that at the end of the day they were a lot harder to work in the wood that when I started. I am not saying that there is no difference, just that it is very small. However the actual edge should obviously be polished and the grind lines should run into the edge, not parallel to it.

I won't really be happy until I've tried one of each of the Gransfors axes. What incredible tools!

Indeed, I think a lot of perspectives would be altered on the forums if experience with the Wildlife hatchet and Forest axe was common. I am definately spending some more time this weekend with the forest axe.

-Cliff
 
It has been some time since I bought the axe and I have been using it quite a bit lately. The felling power is quite good, it easily handles trees that large that I can not easy move them any great distance by hand (when fresh) without bucking them in half. An eight inch thick piece of pine for example is no match at all for this axe.

You can easily get 2"+ of penetration, which means 12 hits opens up the front and a couple of hits on the back and the tree is down. In theory of course, in practice, getting a perfect run is a bit difficult, and I like to work closer to the ground that is optimal for blade angle so I have to double up on the bottom hits so it is more like 18+ on the front and then a small notch on the back. In any case such a tree is not trivial to move when fresh.

The limbing ability is very good, I have used it on many larger trees (~12") which were felled by chainsaw. The axe easily handles even the largest of branches. And at the same time isn't that much overkill when used on smaller wood, such as the trees that it is usually used to cut down. You can also choke up under the head to work on very small trees where full swings are too much as the wood isn't stiff enough to be cut well.

Sharpening has been without problems. I keep the axe head heavily oiled and clean it and sharpen only after every few outings. This is just a refinish with a 1000 and then 4000 grit waterstone and then a quick polish with CrO. The axe is by no means dull before sharpening, it can still for example slice grass. However the sharpening keeps the blade very close to optimal and keeps fresh metal along the edge so crack propogation doesn't become an issue. It is a simple matter since the axe is very sharp to begin with and is only a few mintues work.

In reflection however, while a fine axe for dedicated limbing (which is what it now gets used for), and felling of medium trees, it seems to me to be vastly overkill for any kind of survival enviroment unless you are planning on very long term living. It isn't that it can not handle the tasks, but that it has so much more capability. I would think that the small forest axe would easily be enough to take down and tree of size for shelter building, or even burning. And of course the smaller axe would be easier to use for "knife" work.

I have been working with the Forest axe a lot lately, and am enjoying it quite a bit. Mainly it gets used to take down medium trees (4-6") which are then used as limbing fodder for my various large blades. I am definately getting a full size GB felling axe later this year. I might pick up the small forest axe as well to see what size of tree it handles without excess difficulty and how it fares in general.

-Cliff
 
In Canada one can special order Gransfors through Lee Valley. Here's a reply I got to inquiry:
"We have heard from our Special Orders department regarding your request for
the 3lb Gransfors axe, small forest axe and a mini belt
hatchet. The Mini belt hatchet is $95.00 CDN (not including shipping or any
applicable taxes) and takes 12 to 16 weeks for delivery since only one
blacksmith at Gransfors makes that model.

Unfortunately, we no longer carry the Small Forest Axe (item # 48U0503) in our product line. However, we have 1 left in stock and I have placed it at my desk should you wish to order it. The cost of the Small Forest Axe is $89.00 CDN and does not include any shipping or taxes.

We were unsure if the 3 Lb. Axe you were referring to was the Swedish Broad Axe that Gransfors makes. If you could verify this when responding to our e-mail we would appreciate it.

Please reply to this e-mail to let us know how we should proceed.

We trust this answers your question and we look forward to receiving your
reply.

Regards,

Jason Craig
Internet Customer Service Representative"
One small forest axe is on its way here!
 
I haven't bothered with my chainsaw since my GB axes showed up.

What great tools!
 
Jimbo you bastard! Seriously though, that susprises me as I would have assumed the small forest axe would be one of their best sellers, it is what I would pick for a back packers axe. I think I might sell my Foest axe once I get the felling axes later this year (Tuatahi and GB) as I don't collect them and I usually use large blades for limbing and getting the smaller wood. I will have to see how awkward the felling axes are on the smaller wood that is just a bit above what I would want to use the knives on. The Forest axe bridges this gap wonderfully well, it also handles limbing on the larger wood very well also, so that will be another issue.

I finally managed to damage the face of the Forest axe yesterday. In the first hour I was in the woods the next tree in line to be cut down presented a very bad situation. There was a complete ring of knots along the bottom right below where I would start the down cut. I could go above them but that would leave too much waste (old habits and all that). After the first cut I know the situation is even worse as the penetration is very low, less than half what it should be.

This is the point where you stop and leave that tree alone and switch to your rougher axe, or at the very least really cut back on your power. However being curious I decide to go ahead at full force. Underneath the first knots was a cluster of many very black and solid knots, can't get much worse than that. What tended to happen then was the first knots would shatter and force the axe off path where it would hit the other knots off-center and thus put a high lateral load on the edge. It only took ~15 hits to take out the front wedge, but by that time I had a 0.5 cm ripple in the center of the edge and another right at the toe.

I took a large blade that I had with me and using some direct pressure managed to get the ripple back into shape. Generally, if this happens you stop working with the axe until you have fully corrected the damage, as dents like these can spread easily, however I didn't want to leave as I don't get a lot of free time lately and I still had two hours of day light left. Anyway after about five minutes of work the ripples are just barely visible, and it holds up fine for the next two hours.

When I get back hone, using a file I reset the edge, losing only a small fraction of a mm (~0.2) of metal. I then sharpen it up with a couple of waterstones and a strop. Checking under magnification and strong light there is no sign of any ripple and the edge is back to 100 %. GB has really done a fine job on this heat treat. The steel is that hard that it is just barely able to be filed, and yet it still resists fracture even when heavily shocked.



-Cliff
 
I took the GB axe again yesterday after putting a fresh edge on it. I took along a camera to take a few shots of the axe in action. Here is a shot of the front double notch, after the tree has been felled, and then bucked :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/double-notch_felling_bucking.jpg

The opening was a little sloppy as there were knots I had to work around. This tree was at the limit of what the axe can handle with two hits across. The stump was also a little high as there is another ring of knots right under the cut which I had to go above. Note the waves in the bucking cut, I was standing on ice and snow and could not get as firm a base as I would want.

Here is a shot of a single notch where the relief cut was done by a swede (bow) saw. It also shows the felled tree and a full shot of the entire tree :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/notch_felling.jpg

Using a saw, does speed the process up significantly. It reduces the axe work by a factor of easily 1/4 . If you have not done it before, you chop much softer with the axe if there is a bottom saw cut. The axe has nothing on the underside pushing back and thus the penetration skyrockets as well does the ease of glancing.

That being said I prefer to work with the saw as I like axe work and I have the time. The only real problem is that it does force higher stumps. Check out the really high one in front of the tree in the above second picture. That had the worse knotty base I have seen on a tree this year. The bottom foot was all knots, forget chopping through that without an axe dedicated to rough work.

I was doing all the limbing with a Tramontina Bolo :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/tramontina_bolo.jpg

This has extensive edge reprofiling, handle rasp work, as well as a smoothing of the end-hook to low the transition angle. Besides the limbing it was also used to clear out the brush, as well as take down all trees three inches and under. It makes a very nice addition to the axe.

-Cliff
 
Originally posted by Cliff Stamp
I think I might sell my Foest axe once I get the felling axes later this year (Tuatahi and GB) as I don't collect them and I usually use large blades for limbing and getting the smaller wood. I will have to see how awkward the felling axes are on the smaller wood that is just a bit above what I would want to use the knives on.

I have both the GB felling axe and the Forest axe. I find the felling axe really large and cumbersome for smallish trees. I end up only using it on the big guys, and the Forest axe gets probably 5x the usage.

I suppose it all depends on your trees.
 
And I shall prove it when I go visit the post office tomorrow - the online check shows parcel still in Kitimat...
I was busy last night dropping some trees with the small forest axe - and it's everything one expects from GB. Pretty shocking performance from something that you can carry inside a pack.
I rehandled the supposed 1 3/4 Iltis head (actually 2lb 2oz) with a 36" handle to use for falling leaners. and despite not being well balanced to the longer and heavier handle, it works much better than I would have believed. Every inch of clearance gives me a little more chance in case of a mishap. The intention is to use the long light headed axe for teaching kids because of less chance of injury. I also got an advertised 2 1/2lb Iltis head from Lee Valley which came in at 2lb 14oz.. That too is going onto a 36" handle. Unfortunately it's going on very slowly as I try to compensate for head misalignment. It does ring like a bell though - just as they say. It'll be interesting to see how the heavier axe works as the profile is pretty good. The wide "Oxehead" blade will make me think I'm going to do execution as I go off into the bush.. We'll see how it works out.
Going back to the small forest axe - you're probably right in believing it to be the survival axe of choice. The two handed hold makes it far less tiring to use than a hatchet - and because of the all the good GB balance and sharpeness stuff it'll outcut most larger axes that haven't had a lot of work. RM Patterson of Nahanni fame used such an axe even for winter travel. It gets pretty wet here though at times - to the point where you can use all the axe you can carry to get to dry wood. For the most part though - better to have a lighter axe with you than a heavier one at home or in the truck.
 
bae :

I suppose it all depends on your trees.

Yes, in particular, the two in the above would definately benefit from a larger axe, the only thing that would hinder this in general would be the lack of rigidity of the tree. Jimbo makes a point about handle length, which is the other thing besides raw power, I would prefer a longer handle for felling just to allow easier work closer to the ground.

Jimbo, the Iltis has a nice wide face, and the profile to allow strong penetration along the width, it would seem though just from speculation that it would bind heavily. I also get a "feel" for it being brittle just from the pictures, however that is just bias against painted axe heads. Does it file readily?

-Cliff
 
The lighter Iltis will file far more readily than the larger. I think that you'd be in for serious work flattening the bevels on the larger axe with a file.
The axes are well profiled with lots of back bevel and there isn't any problem reducing the thickest part of the bevel - no sticking if you polish the back of the bevel a bit. Really it's all a question of putting in time shaping the edge bevel so that it's what it should have been coming from the maker. I haven't had any problems with the one axe in use other than the problems with the first handle. We'll see more as I try out the larger axe on some hard and knotty wood.

The best way of describing these heads is that a fine design is rather sloppily manufactured - now. Alberta Ed really likes his Iltis axes, and I can see where a few years ago with some quality control on grinding and fitting of handles they'd have been great axes for the money. Now you can't really trust even a good looking axe - and making one by fitting a head is possibly a lot of work. The light head went onto a handle perfectly straight despite having a shim inside on the original handle. The big axe head looks good but has slight head misalignment and so is lots of work. It arrived so blunt that it would be impossible to cut yourself with it. No edge at all - none..
 
I think the major problem is that axes have been switched from a tool where it was an integral part of your life and thus heavily depended on, to use now as mainly for the hobbiest and far more as a "utility" tool that dedicated to woodwork. When the amount of wood you cut meant how warm you stayed in the winter, there was no tolerance at all for anything less than optimal performance. You only had so much time to get the wood, you also had gardening, fishing etc., and often outside jobs for extra money.

What is the real result now of a poor axe? Well you lose the time you spent deciding it wasn't functional, any attemps to make it so, the cost involved, and the time to get a better model or a replacement. When money is very tight, and time is very short you just could not afford this, and companies knew it so they could not be lax. This is why, as has often been said, GB should be held in high regard, as while their axes are still not perfect NIB, they are much closer than what else is offered, with the exception of the Tuatahi ones I assume.

It is also why posts from people like Jim are so valuable as it is rare now to see people who can even notice faults in axes let alone be able to take steps to correct them. Seriously Jim, you could quite probably set yourself up as an "Axe doctor" or sorts and sell reconditioned versions. The differences made by head/handle alignment, and especially proper edge shape and sharpening can easily turn the performance around many times to one. It can make a daunting task one that becomes very easy to do.

Just out of curiosity, I took along a hardware store "utility" axe with me yesterday, with the GB forest axe. I could cut down an eight inch tree with the GB with less time and effort than a four inch tree with the utility axe, which was heavier and had a wider face. Which reminds me of the Czech axe I bought awhile ago, I need to grind the face of that down to get it to cut anything, as it is, it can barely function as a splitter :

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=171749

-Cliff
 
I guess I really wanted to make sure that all the good information about axes didn't die out. I still remember some things from years ago when people really knew them - but information now is pretty well lost. I believe that even the "Keeping Warm with an Axe" book by Dudley Cook is out of print. There's lots of great axe information in "Bushcraft" by Mors Kochanski - but lots of that doesn't sink in until you get a working axe and use it a lot. RM Patterson's books on the Canadian Wilderness have lots of good information too - but often it's not picked up unless you are really looking for it.

All the rebuilding of axes I've done lately has been to learn a bit about what makes a good axe - and well because like all schoolteachers I'm cheap. I sure do a lot of chopping and not all the wood is clean enough that I'd risk a good or expensive axe on it. The bottom line, though is that it's far less trouble to just go get a Gransfors.
Here's a neat piece about axes that Alberta Ed posted a while back in the Wilderness forum. It's sure worth a read!

"I know a bit about axes, having hewed, split and chopped a house-sized load of firewood over the years. Here's an article I published a few years ago. Hope it's not too long.
Name the single most essential piece of equipment for a wilderness survival situation. No, not a knife, sleeping bag, lighter, GPS receiver, cell phone or case of MRE's. The answer is, an ax. Preferably a portable, well honed single bit of at least three quarter length. While not the best device for delicate tasks... you're better off shaving with your BiC... pure physics, the leverage of the handle combined with the wedge-shaped bit, make the ax the most versatile hand-wielded cutting tool.
The wilderness's most bloodthirsty foes are best combated with a bottle of DEET and a good mosquito mesh. A three or four inch knife blade is sufficient for 98.9% of all the needs and outdoorsman normally faces; 1% calls for an even smaller blade (pulling splinters, snakebite surgery, etc.) , and the remaining .1% only happens to Rambo, Conan, and Crocodile Dundee, .1% of the time (if that).
No other cutting tool from multi-bladed Swiss Army pocketknife to the formidable kukri can equal the utility of the ax. Stone ax heads have been found all over the world, in pratically every culture; it's one of Mankind's earliest tools. With an ax you can chop and split firewood, slice bacon, clean and skin game, open cans, pare your nails (carefully), build a raft or a cabin and slice pizza. You can shave with one, too, if you're patient enough to hone it, like Queequeg's harpoon, and have a steady hand. As a last-ditch defensive tool, an ax is a fearsome weapon. They have been carried into combat for eons, from ancient Rome to Vietnam.
Several decades ago, a prospector friend of mine and some companions took an ill-considered shortcut in the mountains which now are part of Wells Gray Park, British Columbia, and found themselves trapped in a crevasse between a glacier and a cliff face. They would be there still, or likely further down, if it hadn't been for their only ax, which they used to chop a tunnel out to the face of the glacier. Then they used it to cut footsteps along the 45 degree glare ice to safe ground. Sweating all the way.
Ernest Hemingway knew the value of a good ax. In Green Hills of Africa, while hacking a trail through heavy brush with a panga, the African machete, he wished for "a Michigan double-bitted ax, honed razor-sharp, to chop with instead of this sabering of trees." Even American poet Walt Whitman, though admittedly not as macho as Hemingway, celebrated the ax in Song of the Broad-ax. A callused tie maker might have taken a less romantic view of the tool, but many a homesteader hewed the floorboards for his cabin with a broad-ax, a huge, one-bevelled, battle-ax sized single bit with an offset handle. An expert could plane a log so cleanly that it looked as if it had been machine squared. Not more than two generations ago, the millions of railroad ties that spanned Canada were squared by broad-ax and adz, which is merely an ax with the cutting edge rotated 90 degrees.
There used to be dozens of U.S, manufacturers making scores of different ax patterns: for instance, the Puget Sound double bit falling ax, with an extra long head (from edge to edge) with thin cutting edges, ideal for notching a big Douglas fir. Then there were the Lippincott, California swamper and California falling patterns, and many others.
A century ago, skilled blacksmiths forged axes by hammer welding a "bit" of hardened steel into an iron head. These were capable of taking an incredible edge, but the hard steel could chip or shatter if anything harder than wood were struck. When working in bitter cold, old-time loggers would heat the bits with a candle before beginning work. Once chopping began, friction would keep the steel warm, not to mention, the logger. Today's better axes are forged from a single piece of steel and appropriately heat treated. Don't waste your money on any ax advertised as being formed from cast steel.
Every competent horse wrangler prizes his razor sharp single bit, and would sooner loan his toothbrush. Veteran off-road drivers won't willingly venture off the road without an ax. It's a fail-safe backup to the chainsaw. My preferred car ax is a double-bit Iltis swamper, designed for slicing branches off felled trees. Shorter and lighter than a full-sized Michigan double-bit, its thin blade is designed for cutting, not splitting. Its 2 1/4 lb. head is 10" long from edge to edge and has a 5 1/4" face. None-the-less, it can accomplish any chore an ax is suited to, including hewing through in relatively short order an 18" diameter tree which had fallen across the road while I was fishing along the Bella Coola River. A chainsaw would have been faster, but no more effective. The same ax has been used for field dressing deer and moose, and as a cleaver for butchering big game.
In my Trapper Nelson backpack goes a three-quarter size single bit Iltis, its edge protected by a sturdy leather sheath secured with copper rivets. Its heavy, 2 1/2 lb. head is 6" wide at the face and 7 3/4" deep: a formidable tool. It's been used to cut and split firewood, pound tent pegs, and to quarter a moose. The 18" handle makes it easy to pack, although more dangerous than a longer handled ax: you're more likely to shear a leg with a short ax or hatchet because you're cutting closer to yourself. Even better for backpacking is the venerable Hudson's Bay single bit, with a one and three-quarter pound head. It's far more useful than a short hunter's hatchet, and only a few ounces heavier.
Australians developed a heavy single bit design, often forged in stainless steel, specifically for chopping hardwoods. These tools are two or three times larger and heavier than an ordinary single bit, almost broadax size, and are prized by North American loggers who compete in log chopping contests. These experts send dinner plate-sized chips flying while standing on a log in their caulk boots, chopping between their feet, a feat not recommended for the novice. However, these specialized tools are not practical for general use on the North American continent.
Practically every hardware store offers a variety of axes; typically, they're about as sharp as a butter knife and not much more useful until sharpened. Most axes sitting in a dusty corner of the tool shed or the garage answer this description. To be used efficiently and safely, an ax requires a keen edge; not as thin as a knife blade, which would fold under the first impact, but just as sharp. It's not difficult to hone an ax shaving keen with only a file and a small hone.
The Boy Scout manual points out the right way to file an ax. The ax should be propped or clamped edge upwards. A double-bit can be sunk into a handy stump, but more ingenuity is required for a single bit. When there isn't a vise handy, lay the single bit edge-up against a chunk of firewood half as thick as the depth of the blade, and pound in a couple of stakes, one at the butt, another behind the head, to hold it in place. A foot on the handle holds it firmly. To file the other side, just flip the ax around and place the firewood chunk in front of the other stake.
It's a good idea when filing an ax to wear heavy gloves or to shield your fingers by punching the tang of the file through some sort of shield: a can lid, piece of plastic, heavy cardboard or leather. Beginning about an inch and a half back from the edge, carefully file down to the edge from the toe to the heel of the blade. This provides an appropriate bevel for good cutting. If only the edge is filed, eventually the blade will take on a bevel too thick to sink deeply into the wood, and will be useful only for splitting. I have read that some veteran axmen deliberately leave one bit of a double-bit ax thicker for splitting and chopping roots or other rough work, and hone the other razor sharp for cutting clean wood. However, I've never met one. A mattock or a Pulaski -- firefighter's tool with one ax blade and an adze blade on the other end -- are more appropriate for that kind of abuse.
If the blade is seriously worn down, you might have to start filing even further back from the edge. A session with a powered grinding wheel may be necessary, rather than spend an inordinate amount of time filing. The big old grindstones, propelled by a foot treadle, are all but gone now, but they avoided overheating the steel. A power grinder is just as good, if you're careful not to allow the heat generated by the friction of grinding to build up and destroy the temper of the steel.
Work both sides of the bit evenly until you achieve a noticeable burr, which occurs when both planes of the edge meet. Then take a small whetstone (and bearing in mind that a sharp edge will slice your fingers just as neatly as a tree trunk), stroke along the edge until the burr disappears. Your ax should then be sharp enough to shave.
When choosing an ax, examine the handle carefully. Some come with fiberglass handles; there's little to worry about with those. Hickory is the preferred wood for ax handles. Avoid handles in which the grain is disguised by paint; you won't be able to detect a flaw until the thing breaks. The grain should be aligned with the plane of the blade, and should follow the line of the handle, whether straight (double-bit) or curved (single bit). There should be no splinters.
Many handles are seated with injected thermoplastic, which is an excellent way to secure the head. Others use the traditional wooden wedge, sometimes with smaller steel wedges planted crosswise. If a wood-wedged ax head begins to work loose, sometimes it can be tightened up by soaking it in a bucket of water overnight. This is a temporary measure, however, and eventually the wedge will have to be re-seated or replaced. It's a good idea to secure the head by drilling a hole through the blade and pinning it with a tight-fitting pin which is cut off and filed even.
Most handles are too rough to use, straight from the store, and paint or varnish finishes are hard on the hands. When fitting a new handle, sandpaper or scrape the finish off, and then apply a couple of coats of boiled linseed oil or tung oil, which is more water-resistant. The oil protects the handle against moisture and splitting, and looks handsome, too. Apply a new coat as needed.
When chopping, make sure there is nothing in the vicinity to catch your blade, such as a branch or a strand of wire. Steel-toed boots and eye protection will provide more than peace of mind. Well-fitting gloves will help protect your lily-whites from blisters, but loose or stiff gloves can cause you to make a mis-stroke.
The key to safe ax work is to always have something between you and the edge of your ax. A chopping block is handiest for splitting, of course. In the bush, firewood can be leaned up on the opposite side of a log between you and the target. Firewood smaller than stump size doesn't have to be struck on the end to split. Strike at the side of the target piece, far enough down from the end so that it doesn't flip up and strike you in the face. A handy way to split smaller pieces of wood and kindling is to gently tap the blade into the side of the piece; then, with both hands holding the firewood against the ax handle, smack it onto a log or stump. Bracing the wood with one hand and chopping with the other is a technique for aspiring amputees. When you get into really big, or tough, twisted wood, a splitting maul or a steel wedge and a sledge hammer are called for. With these handy tools, I've split slabs of spruce seven feet across into chunks small enough to pack into the Land Cruiser. Two slabs filled the vehicle. Once home, an old, worn-down double-bit made short work of the chunks.
A double bit is a handy tool, and its extra weight makes it ideal for splitting. Don't sink it into a log and walk away when you're done, however; the exposed blade is an accident waiting to happen. Lean it against something, head down, or lay it flat where no one can stumble on it and slice a foot. Better yet, sheathe the blade. A section of tough old hydraulic hose slipped over the edge(s) makes a convenient sheath. A steel can hammered flat makes an effective (though inelegant) guard. You may be able to find a plastic sheath like those made for ice skates, or make your own from heavy leather and copper rivets.
When lopping branches, always cut toward the top of the tree to keep the ax from binding in the crotch. On a felled tree, first cut the branches on the opposite side, keeping the trunk between you and the edge, then cross the tree and repeat. It's handiest to leave the branches on the bottom on to support the trunk off the ground, particularly if you plan to saw or chop the trunk into firewood.
As a general rule, if you're planning to chop through a thick piece of wood which will take more than a couple of strokes, begin by cutting a notch at least as wide as the tree is thick. That will leave sufficient room to hew through the trunk without the ax binding in the cut. Work from both sides of the tree, always keeping enough wood between you and the ax edge to save your shins.
Don't chop with all your strength; let the ax do the work. Putting all your effort into a stroke sacrifices accuracy and safety. The best axemen (or axewomen, in this age of equality) make it look effortless, like all good athletes.
If you've forgotten your Swiss Army knife and need to open a can, use the ax to cut an "X" across the top, then bend back the flaps (carefully).
Treat your ax with the respect and care any fine tool deserves, and it will serve you well."
 
I think we should than Ed. That's sure a wonderful piece of writing for people who like axes!
You might be wondering about the size of the spruce he split up - seven feet across is actually small..
sprucegsfas.jpg

Notice the axe?
 
Nice repost, I caught that when it was first posted on the Survival forum. The only comment I would make is in regards to felling, while ideally you want a notch that wide, on large trees, especially the harder ones, this isn't practical initially as the axe won't clear out the wood. Thus you start out with a notch as large as can be opened right away (no need to go much wider than the width of the tree), and once it v's out, you either widen it, or open another notch above it, clear that one out and then open it into the bottom one and continue. Working in this fasion you minimize wedging the axe in the wood, as this will happen quite readily if the axe isn't breaking the wood out as you are cutting. Felling large wood is very dangerous though, even with clean straight trees, so it is not advisible for a novice to grab an axe and start whacking away into a 12" stick. I would stay with wood that large you can physically make it fall where you want it to, until you get very good and making them fall where they should without any pushing on your part, as once a large tree starts to go, you have no hope of influencing it except by prayer.


-Cliff
 
Back
Top