- Joined
- May 1, 2014
- Messages
- 890
Just like to exchange some thoughts with Sebenza collector/enthusiasts. How do you see the Sebenza 25 in future?
On one hand it was produced only a rather short period (at least within the CRK world 4 years are more of a short life cycle). So do you think that factor will make it kind of rare, sought-after?
On the other hand one may regard the Sebenza 25 as kind of an experimental/prototype phase, ending into todays Inkosi. From that point of view it is not really a discontinued model. Just changed its name and received some technical evolution.
I am kind of split minded at the moment, whether I should add one 25 to my Sebenza collection. But then I am thinking that the name "Sebenza 25" was wrong, as it does not have the bushing, which to me makes a Sebenza. Now it is the Inkosi, another great knife, but trully a different model than the Sebenza. Should I add one to my collection, because it is named "Sebenza"? Or should I ignore it, as it has (in my eyes) never been a Sebenza? You are getting my point
I am sure most of you have made the same observations I've made with discontinued models: You are not paying much attention and then suddenly people start looking after them. A good example for this psychological thing is the old pivot Umnum. Not long ago, maybe 2, 3 years. Level of attention for the old pivot Umnum was pretty low. Now people are exited about them.
What's your opinion?
On one hand it was produced only a rather short period (at least within the CRK world 4 years are more of a short life cycle). So do you think that factor will make it kind of rare, sought-after?
On the other hand one may regard the Sebenza 25 as kind of an experimental/prototype phase, ending into todays Inkosi. From that point of view it is not really a discontinued model. Just changed its name and received some technical evolution.
I am kind of split minded at the moment, whether I should add one 25 to my Sebenza collection. But then I am thinking that the name "Sebenza 25" was wrong, as it does not have the bushing, which to me makes a Sebenza. Now it is the Inkosi, another great knife, but trully a different model than the Sebenza. Should I add one to my collection, because it is named "Sebenza"? Or should I ignore it, as it has (in my eyes) never been a Sebenza? You are getting my point

I am sure most of you have made the same observations I've made with discontinued models: You are not paying much attention and then suddenly people start looking after them. A good example for this psychological thing is the old pivot Umnum. Not long ago, maybe 2, 3 years. Level of attention for the old pivot Umnum was pretty low. Now people are exited about them.
What's your opinion?