Self-Sharpening blades : a side effect of acute edge angles

Cliff Stamp

BANNED
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
17,562
By self-sharpening I mean a blade that actually gets sharper as you cut with it and thus the cutting ability increases. I noticed this off an on for a number of years without paying much attention to it. When cutting with knives for a long time it is difficult to judgeby feel the cutting ability as compared to what it was five minutes ago, when the changes are so small, maybe it was that the material just got a little easier to cut. When I started doing cutting tests awhile ago and measuring the sharpness of various blades and how it degraded during cutting, I didn't notice this self-sharpening effect so I figured that what I had saw in the past was just some kind of fluke. However recently I noticed it again and finally looked at it in enough detail to figure out what was going on.

First some background. Quite awhile ago (more than a few years) on rec.knives Alvin Johnson made a comment about one of the many serious drawbacks of stainless steels was that if you honed them at a very fine angle the edge blunted quickly when compared to carbon steels. Before you get ready to jump all over this with chants of the superior nature of ATS-34 and the like, this is in reference to sharpening angles of 5-10 degrees included. This is much finer than even the more acute production knives (Spyderco, Buck). I never payed much attention to that comment at the time, since my angles were much steeper and I saw no loss in sharpness of even the worst stainless (coarse grained) as compared to carbon. Sometime later (a few years) I was reading some posts by Jeff Clark on edge finish quality and how there was again a large difference in the stainless steels, he said more than that, that is just the relevant part here.

As of late (the last few years), I have been steadily bringing the edge profiles on my knives down (and adjusting the primary grind, but that is another story). During this process I noted time and time again that what Alvin and Jeff has said was indeed the case. The coarse grained steels can't take as fine polish at very acute angles as the finer grained carbon steels. This doesn't mean you can't get a stainless blade sharp, they will shave very easily for example. But they won't get as sharp as the carbon steels. If you check them under magnification you can see the edge tends to break apart during sharpening and you really can't polish it beyond a certain leve. I did some checking on the woodworking group and this had been noticed there before as well. Considering the size of the carbides in some of these steels (order of 50 microns or 0.05 mm), this isn't that surprising. Ref :

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=1446725

Ok, on to the self-sharpening effect. When I started repeating the above mentioned cutting testing on the really acute edged knives I noticed that the blades would frequently increase in cutting ability during a run. You would start off with a very sharp blade, it would dull a little, then get sharper and sort of then oscillate getting duller then sharper. This of course slowed the degradation quite a bit, and radically enhanced the edge life of the blade. As an extreme case, with a 62 RC D2 blade with an edge of ~5 degrees per side, after doing ~1000 slices through 3/8" hemp, a further ~1000 slices did nothing to effect the edge aggression (measured in a few ways subjectively as well as quantitatively).

The explanation becomes clear when the edge is checked under magnification. You see the edge degrades in an irregular manner leaving "teeth" which are sharp and thus act as mini-saws. As these teeth wear and round out, new ones are produced as the edge gets damaged in other places and new teeth are revealed. Some times the rate of which new ones come in, is slower that the old ones wear so overall the blades still blunt, but at a reduced rate, however other times the reverse happens and overall the blade gets sharper. This random nature is why the blade can get blunt, then sharper, then blunt. In regards to the D2 knife, since it is such a coarse grained steel (30-50 microns), the edge breaks apart in a very aggressive manner and pretty much presents an all carbide edge to the material which induces pretty much zero edge blunting from that point on (as compared to normal steel blades).

How come you only see it in very acute edges? Well basically the depth of the teeth that are created are inversely related to the the angle of the edge (not exactly but close enough). This the more acute the edge the greater the size of the teeth, and essentially the more coarse the finish and thus the more aggressive the slicing action. Since the edges on most production knives are 5-10 times the angles we are talking about here, the teeth produced on them in the above fashion have far less aggression (it is the difference between a very fine hone and a very coarse one), and thus you never notice any self-sharpening effect. The same thing is in general happening, however the teeth are just too small to make any significant effect in the cutting ability.

To be clear these types of blades (such low edge angles) are only suitable for cutting ropes, foods, wood, fabrics etc., the edge durability is rather low so prying or twisting the edge, even lightly isn't a good idea. Or consider for example hitting a staple in a cardboard box. With a fragile and hard steel this can induce a break to a steel thickness of about 0.005"-0.01". For a knife sharpened at the common "22 degrees per side", this means you will see a small chip, just barely visible. With a knife of the profile we are talking about here, the same damage could knock out a piece of the edge about 1/16 to 1/8" or so deep. That would require a major sharpening effort to repair. Thus typically I carry a number of "rough" use knives for such tasks like a SAK, Leatherman etc., for such work.

Also note this sharpening effect is only seen in regards to slicing performance. In regards to push cutting, all these "teeth" degrade the push cutting ability and you will just see the edges blunt. In fact, the edges that work very well for this slicing self-sharpening, blunt pretty much the quickest for push cutting (as Alvin noted). As with everything, a gain in one area pretty much means a direct loss somewhere else. Some materials also don't induce this type of self-sharpening. but a lot of common materials will. Aside from ropes, cardboard does it very readily also. Getting a bit specific, this effect only sets in during the latter stages of the blades edge life. For example with the D2 blade, this was at ~50% of its optimal rope cutting ability.

-Cliff
 
Surely this effect can't go on too long. Even on a very acute bevel, the slow abrasion of steel and carbides would immediately start to thicken the edge by wearing the tip of the apex away and eventually (how long?) result in it blunting wouldn't it?
 
Matthew, Cliff sort of quantified the effect: "after doing ~1000 slices through 3/8-inch hemp, a further ~1000 slices did nothing to effect the edge aggression". This is with a D2 alloy blade with an edge that is razor thin. It certainly doesn't go on forever, but it does seem to go on much longer than you would expect.

It seems to me (though I haven't measured the effect quantitatively) that I have seen the opposite effect with stainless steel blades. As they wear they get smoother even faster than they lose edge acuteness. They become less agressive slicers as they get smooth.
 
This is an interesting thing, but I doubt that there is a noticeable effect when actually working with a knife.

But maybe in industrial cutting machines there could be a practical application for this effect?

Any thoughts?
 
Matthew, yes indeed, the edge does thicken in this manner just as you note, and yes this will be a limiting factor. There is some counter action as well though, as metal wears along the sides of the bevel to thin it back out. I verified this awhile ago by looking at the polish, and you could see it getting finer on the edge (under magnification), as the rope and cardboard wore the metal down. However yes, as you noted, this process can't go on forever as eventually the edge will thicken to the point that the cutting ability will be too low. In regards to the D2 blade, during the rope cutting in the above, it was now at 50% of its optimal ability. In regular use I would have long ago sharpened it, I just continued using it when it was that blunted as I want to see how the edge would continue to degrade.

Jeff, I should have clarified as well that the extent to which this is observed is dependent on the initial finish. The more coarse you leave it to begin with, the more you will see this serrated effect take place as the edge wears. This is easy to understand as irregular teeth in the beginning will obviously increase the chance of irregular breaks. However I have still seen it with very fine finishes (teeth of less than 1/200 of a mm deep), on very acute edges (~6-8 degrees per side). This isn't to the extent of the D2 blade though. I have been doing a lot of cutting with Olfa blades, and you can see it readily during the cardboard slicing. With them though it is oscillatory which makes sense as they are low alloy steels. They dull, and you do some more cutting and they sharpen up.

In regards to the stainless blades, I have done little cutting with them of late, and stopped working with them before I started looking at performance in the last year or so which is when I got more detail specific. The performance just isn't there compared to the non-stainless steels so I have little interest. In general though, the grain structure of stainless blades is very coarse, and the high alloy content really needs deep cryo for acute edge formation. This is rare in production blades, and even in custom. I intend to repeat the cutting with my CPM-10V blade with the same initial finish (100 grit AO), I just need to get a few more rolls of rope. It has a much finer grain structure than D2, but much higher wear resistance carbides so it will be interesting to see how it breaks down.

Quiet Storm, the extent of the effect is dependent on the nature of the steel, the geometry and the properties of the materials being cut. It can in extreme cases (D2 blade) be that large that it is obvious something very odd is happening, and in other case (Olfa), you just notice that overall the blade is blunting very slowly.

-Cliff
 
Hi Cliff.

Well, ist'nt that the old Boye dentritic steel effect experienced on D2?
Have you ever noted how thin the Boye edges were?

Still, there is sharp and sharp. D2 as you note does not get really sharp.

The only stainless I know that holds the comparison to carbon steels is 12c27, as crap as a steel some might think it is, gets sharp to the microscopic level, and holds reasonably well (may be not as well, but say astonishingly well for a steel of this composition, at last to a good ATS34 level), because of the small carbide size, but they are numerous, evenly distributed and well bonded in the matrix, so cutting does uniform abrasion on the edge...

Though the edge resistance is higher for the biggest carbides, due to the time it takes to tear all carbides from the edge, the sharpness attained out of 12C27 cannot be compared to that of D2, but to that of fine grained carbon steels.

But that should be expected, as it is by design of the steel. The design is actually a brilliant compromise of grain thinness, rust resistance, hardness, and matrix coherence (brittleness). Therefore amounts of carbon and chromium have been computed so that the dissolution in the matrix is optimal and there is as little left-over as possible. If the proper quenching and tempering are done, it gives a very very fine and often over-looked stainless cutlery steel.

Again a compromise (at least for stainless steels -- D2 for me is a stainless), sharpness and ease of sharpening, or edge holding?
(as you noticed , the later compromise being "or rust"!)

I have some pictures somewhere to scan, and article to traduce about 12c27, and why it is designed this way, as well as comparisons to the 440 steels, but if anybody is interested...

I owe one 12C27 folder, and it does amazingly well, with an extra- ordinary thin edge.

Cliff, like you I tend to dislike thick edges, and regrind most my knives with thinner edges.

I think the thickest, most obtuse, and most useless edge I ever found has been on a Fallkniven A1, what a mess! 2mm thick going to the edge in a 2mm bevel ! Even the cheapest commercial axe is better than that! Surely undestructible, but also bloody useless as a knife.

I am still amazed by the number of factories and custom makers that do thick or obtuse edges, specially in the US.
 
Singularity, I think just about any knife steel (especially stainless steels) should have some Vanadium for grain refinement. Only a small amount of Vanadium is needed to form a fine grain stucture (under 0.30%), and since the grains are small, both tensile stength and toughness are increased. Vanadium also increases hardness and wear resistance (by forming vanadium carbides).
For this reason, think I would prefer AUS8 and perhaps evan AUS6 to Sandvik 12C27, if all else is equal.
 
Frank, While I generally expect stainless alloys with vanadium or tungsten to have finer grain structure than those that don't, I know there are noteable exceptions. MBS-26 (Spyderco's kithchen cutlery alloy) and 12C27 both have fine grain structures to rival AUS-8 and yet they don't have vanadium or tungsten. I don't really know how they can do this, but I've compared them and know it's true.
 
Cliff:

Being pretty much ignorant about this, I doubt I've got anything useful to add, but I'm curious.

If I understand correctly, stainless steel has carbide particles in it. Is this right?

I remember reading something about carbides quite a few years ago. Wherever it was I read it, it said that some types of carbide fracture violently (explode) when heated. Is it likely that the type of carbide used in knife grade stainless is fracturing during the heating processes, either causing the surrounding metal to also fracture, or just leaving the carbide particles loose?
 
Very interesting and educational, I wonder if this is true of all stainless like CPM too? You have a S90v knife, does particle technology differ from other types stainless, or is inability to form acute edges like you describe due to high chromium content (& or high chromium carbides formation?) I hope that makes sense?
Martin
 
Cliff, like you I tend to dislike thick edges, and regrind most my knives with thinner edges.

How thick is "thick"? I know we are speaking of an effect noticed in very controlled work, and indeed might have application in certain <b>real</b> cutting applictions, particularly if the blade is controlled mechanically, for example in a microtome. But as interesting as this might be, real knives in real hands routinely experience latteral stresses that will quickly destroy a too-thinned edge no matter what the steel.

Correct me if I am interpreting this incorrectly, but the problem here with stainless is that you can't thin them out enough to notice this effect without their breaking down just from the grinding/polishing process. This has really nothing to do with whether or not stainless steels can compete with plainer carbon steels when sharpened appropriately for normal work, i.e., at 10 deg/side or more.
 
re matthew:

Thin to me is a 10-15 degrees main bevel (making a 20 to 30 degrees total edge angle) that goes down to the very edge. If secondary bevel there is, it is not more noticeable than 1/10 or 2/10 of mm.

So, I consider an edge thin, generally when there is no or little edge bevel.

I am not talking about controlled conditions, but knives to use. Some steels cannot be ground thin, because of brittleness, but some can.

Some stainless can be ground thin, some not, as well as some non stainless (I prefer this to carbon, they are all carbon) can, and some others cannot. The factor in this is the carbide size, and repartition in the matrix. The grain, as experienced by blacksmiths when breaking a tempered bit of steel is the reflection generally of these two things: homogeneity of the matrix and/or carbide size.

As an example, you can get small carbides precipitated in lines or patterns of netting (interrupting the matrix), or big carbides precipitated randomly (putting disorder in the matrix), both will form a big grain. A fine grain has small carbides precipitated evenly in the matrix. The composition is important, but also the heat-treating, as during the heating some carbides dissolve in the matrix.

I\'ll try to scan pictures so that you can see it.

D2 is on the side of big carbides precipitated in patterns.

Plain carbon steel does not have chromium to dissolve in the matrix, so the picture and overall homogeneity of the iron matrix is much simpler, (and not amazingly, more homogenous ;-).

Of course also there is carbides and carbides, iron carbides are not chromium carbides , are not vanadium carbides, are not tungsten carbides, by hardness magnitude...

Of course there are other mixtures with amazing properties, has anybody ever tried the Roselli UHC (production wootz, 1.5 to 2% carbon, at RC 65)??? I can tell you it rocks compared to D2...

Frank_k:

Vanadium helps, but you\'d steel be amazed on how a properly tempered 12c27 compares to an AUS8 or 6. (say a cold-steel AUS8)
As always, the heat treating is at least as important as the steel composition in the final result.
 
Interesting!

If you start with a polished edge, will the edge re-sharpen more, or less, readily than if you start with a coarser edge?

BTW, this is the kind of article I'd like to see in knife mags :)
 
Singularity :

Well, ist'nt that the old Boye dentritic steel effect experienced on D2?

Similar. He also promoted high initial cutting ability as well for his blades because of the carbide structure. From what I have seen this is more hype than substance, as the grit finish is more important that the carbides for initial edge aggression. The high edge retention he claimed though is indeed probably strongly influenced by the above effect as his steels had large segregated carbide chains, and he recommended leaving the edges coarse.

Have you ever noted how thin the Boye edges were?

The edges are thin, 0.005"-0.01", however they are not overly acute on the ones that I saw, no where near the D2 blade in the above for example. I didn't see the same extent of the effect with his blades for this reason. Though I did indeed note it to some effect.

I have some pictures somewhere to scan, and article to traduce about 12c27, and why it is designed this way, as well as comparisons to the 440 steels, but if anybody is interested...

Very.

I think the thickest, most obtuse, and most useless edge I ever found has been on a Fallkniven A1, what a mess! 2mm thick going to the edge in a 2mm bevel ! Even the cheapest commercial axe is better than that! Surely undestructible, but also bloody useless as a knife.

A lot of "tacticals" have similar geometries. Fallkniven slimmed out the edges later on with full convex grinds to greatly increase the cutting ability.

I am still amazed by the number of factories and custom makers that do thick or obtuse edges, specially in the US.

It is mainly the effect of "tactial" blades + brittle stainless steels, which forced the use of very thick and obtuse edges.

Burke :

Is it likely that the type of carbide used in knife grade stainless is fracturing during the heating processes, either causing the surrounding metal to also fracture, or just leaving the carbide particles loose?

Carbide, as in carbide tools, isn't actually solid carbide, it is usually something like Tungsten carbide in a matrix like Cobalt. The carbides in steel are actual pieces of solid carbide. During the heat treatment these carbides dissolve back into the steel, they then precipitate back out during the quenching and subsequent temper (which also removes the stresses cause by the precipitation and crystal transformation).

martin :

You have a S90v knife, does particle technology differ from other types stainless, or is inability to form acute edges like you describe due to high chromium content (& or high chromium carbides formation?)

Yes, the CPM process insures high carbide dispersion and avoids segregation (clumping), while promoting grain refinement. It would be interesting to look at this with some very high CPM's. I intent to later on when I get some time.


Matthew :

How thick is "thick"?

With flat primary and edge bevels, for a wood cutter, 0.010"-0.020" is optimal for soft to medium woods when fresh, 0.030-0.050" for dry woods or dense hardwoods. Edge angle is from 7.5 to 15 per side. Skill is obviously a large factor as is steel type. For example the 0.05" is only needed if you are very strong, very sloppy, hacking with a soft steel blade on the hardest of woods. Convex bevels can allow you slim this down a little more over flat ones as they handle the lateral loads better (they roll with the shock). For thick bone and hardened metals you need a more obtuse edge angle, especially if you want to come straight on. For normal everyday materials (rope, cardboard, food etc.), you can grind very thin and acute. My edc knives are usually 5-8 degrees per side in the secondary edge bevel which is just present as a hint of convexity in the last fraction of a mm. Just use an heavy duty Olfa knife for awhile (0.5 mm thick blade, < 10 degree edge bevel), and see what it takes to crack the blade up.

Singularity :

... has anybody ever tried the Roselli UHC (production wootz, 1.5 to 2% carbon, at RC 65)???

It is definitely on my list.

... it rocks compared to D2...

What is the hardness of the D2?

Informative comments on carbide and grain structure. Note the various carbides are different in size and aggression in addition to hardness, and carbides can also be formed in several different ways out of the same materials. Deep cryo for example promotes the formation of highly wear resistant carbides structures (eta-carbide), while cold treatment (-110F) do not (epsilon carbides are formed).

Andrew :

If you start with a polished edge, will the edge re-sharpen more, or less, readily than if you start with a coarser edge?

Less during slicing, more during push cutting.

-Cliff
 
Cliff,

The boyes I had were thin and accute...

I'll do the traducing, and pict scanning of the article for 12c27...
I hope I can automatize most of it...

Roselli Carpenter UHC I compared with Dozier general utility D2 and Benchmade nimravus cub in M2. My feeling is that it exceeds them. A real bastard to sharpen though. May be I should make a review out of it ?
I am not sure of Dozier D2 hardness -- 61 ?

The UHC is said to be brittle, but I did not verify. Mine felt tip first (and is very needle like) on a ceramic floor, from my height, the tip flattened on less than a 1/10th of mm, almost invisible, the ceramic floor had a chip...


Fallkniven A1 is not the same anymore any way, thanks to my power grinder :D. A bext step would be to make it fully convex.

Cheers,
 
Cliff does this hold true when a blade has been used to chop something? What you have explained makes perfect sense, But only my smallest blades get used exclusivly for slicing. Would using the blade for whittling , scraping or chopping degrade the edge too quickly to notice this effect?
 
Sandvick article scanned, OCR'ed, rebuilt in html, and traduced at here.
Original in french here.

These are provided for reference only.

Sorry the traduction is pretty crude (thanks to google, who did it in two seconds), but I tried to read it, and though it does not read like english, but like french with english words, I could understand it.

The pictures are worth a look anyway.

Some will ask what the hell is Z100CD17 or Z40C13, they are french designations, Z=carbon, C=chrome, D=Whatever else Z40C13 = 0.4% C, 13% Cr...

Tell me what you think?
 
Honestly, I own 12c27 and 19c27 blades, and they perform well compared to equivalent composition steels like aus6 or aus8.

I personally prefer the 12c27 to ATS34 for example...

Well, there are a few things in this article:

1 Heat treating is at least as important as steel composition... (what a surprise :) )
2 Sharpness differs at a microscopic level, from steel to steel, it also represent sharpenability (what a surprise :) ).
3 A stainless steel is a compromise between brittleness, edge-holding, and resistance to rust. (what a surprise :) )
4 Reading the composition of a steel tells nothing about the knife's performances...(Ho, what a surprise :) ) Too bad for the guys (it's ok Frank :), I did so too, until I read this article ;) ) that come and tell you "I prefer this steel because there 0.5% more vanadium in it, or this steel because there is perlimpinpin powder in it"... What counts is factual data.
5 A good stainless steel may performs better (8 to 9 times says the guy beetween 12c27 and 1% C steel) than a (pure) carbon steel...
 
Back
Top