- Joined
- Jan 13, 1999
- Messages
- 1,422
I participate on a discussion group made up of mostly women. A self-defense topic came up and I suggested women look into knives and be prepared to use them.
For my good will I was savagely attacked for underestimating the dangers women face.
One of the more coherent objections was that statistically, women are more likely to get hurt by their own weapons during an attack. A knife can get wrestled away and turned on the victim for example. So the arguement is for women not to be armed so as to lessen the chance of a fatal attack.
I personally think this attitude is B.S. But could there be a valid point? If most women cannot overcome their aversion to use a weapon, it's best not to carry one at all?
[This message has been edited by tallwingedgoat (edited 28 July 1999).]
For my good will I was savagely attacked for underestimating the dangers women face.
One of the more coherent objections was that statistically, women are more likely to get hurt by their own weapons during an attack. A knife can get wrestled away and turned on the victim for example. So the arguement is for women not to be armed so as to lessen the chance of a fatal attack.
I personally think this attitude is B.S. But could there be a valid point? If most women cannot overcome their aversion to use a weapon, it's best not to carry one at all?
[This message has been edited by tallwingedgoat (edited 28 July 1999).]