The rebranding of SOG seems to have happened at least a few years ago.
I don't understand why anyone cares about the packaging a knife comes in. If my knife comes in anything other than a basic cardboard box and a bag, I get annoyed that the OEM spent money on that rather than just giving me the knife cheaper.
It's humorous to me that the recommendation by the marketing firm is that SOG needs to have better marketing rather than making well-made folders with good designs, steel, and heat treatment, then pricing them accordingly.
Thanks for the offer. I'll think about it. Just checked out the Tigershark on search engine. These were already gone by the time I became a knife knut. Looks like a good knife, probably could be used as a camp knife. It also says the Tigershark was one of the iconic SOG knives. Why would they discontinue it? And they now need to hire consultants to figure out why their knives aren't selling like in the past?I see that the Tigershark has been discontinued. If you are interested in a tactical Tigershark (partial serrated version with no hand guard) just contact me. I have no use for mine.
About the packaging, yeah, probably true, unfortunately. Although I'm part of the group that doesn't care about that. TOPS and Busse just use plastic bags. I mean, they mail out in a box for shipping, but there is no packaging inside. It hasn't hurt their sales on my end.How much cheaper? A couple of bucks? For every person like you, there will be hundreds that complain about the packaging. Plus, packaging is part of the first impression.
I care about packaging to a certain extent. It can show that a business cares about its products. Sure, they can put the knife in a blister pack or a cardboard box for close to the same cost. I'll pick the box every time.
As to the marketing firm's recommendations, I am not surprised. They are not in the knife making business. They don't know squat about knives or knife making. As a friend would say, "They don't know what they don't know."
About the packaging, yeah, probably true, unfortunately. Although I'm part of the group that doesn't care about that. TOPS and Busse just use plastic bags. I mean, they mail out in a box for shipping, but there is no packaging inside. It hasn't hurt their sales on my end.How much cheaper? A couple of bucks? For every person like you, there will be hundreds that complain about the packaging. Plus, packaging is part of the first impression.
I care about packaging to a certain extent. It can show that a business cares about its products. Sure, they can put the knife in a blister pack or a cardboard box for close to the same cost. I'll pick the box every time.
As to the marketing firm's recommendations, I am not surprised. They are not in the knife making business. They don't know squat about knives or knife making. As a friend would say, "They don't know what they don't know."
I'd take the couple of dollars. You should know who makes good knives without having to look at the packaging. I'd be buying SOG knives if I thought that packaging quality inferred anything about the quality of the knife.How much cheaper? A couple of bucks? For every person like you, there will be hundreds that complain about the packaging. Plus, packaging is part of the first impression.
I care about packaging to a certain extent. It can show that a business cares about its products. Sure, they can put the knife in a blister pack or a cardboard box for close to the same cost. I'll pick the box every time.
As to the marketing firm's recommendations, I am not surprised. They are not in the knife making business. They don't know squat about knives or knife making. As a friend would say, "They don't know what they don't know."
I think a lot of people are well aware of their new line of knives and still don't want any. I know I fit that description.If I'm honest, I'm rather surprised by the current negativity in this post that clearly isn't taking into account SOG's recent attempts to make knives with more premium material. For example, the SOG Pillar Fixed Blade in S35VN comes with a good sheath and has positive reviews. The new premium XR line up including the Seal XR, Pentagon XR, Kiku XR, and vision XR frankly are some of the more promising knife designs I've seen in a while. I do own the terminus XR and was thoroughly impressed with the knife. While SOG besides the Seal Pup Elite, historically hasn't interested me I think their new designs in very promising. I think that should be taken into account with many statements in this thread being what I would consider, dated.
https://sogknives.com/new/
I just don’t see the point in SOG anymore when you have Cold Steel kicking ass all over the place with the whole Asia-sourcing tactical thing.
I also have the Seal Pup Elite. Thought it pretty nifty when I got it years ago. I don't have any of their recent stuff. But my sense is that your statement about dated impressions may well be true. Dated impressions are not fair nor are they impartial.If I'm honest, I'm rather surprised by the current negativity in this post that clearly isn't taking into account SOG's recent attempts to make knives with more premium material. For example, the SOG Pillar Fixed Blade in S35VN comes with a good sheath and has positive reviews. The new premium XR line up including the Seal XR, Pentagon XR, Kiku XR, and vision XR frankly are some of the more promising knife designs I've seen in a while. I do own the terminus XR and was thoroughly impressed with the knife. While SOG besides the Seal Pup Elite, historically hasn't interested me I think their new designs in very promising. I think that should be taken into account with many statements in this thread being what I would consider, dated.
https://sogknives.com/new/
I'd take the couple of dollars. You should know who makes good knives without having to look at the packaging. I'd be buying SOG knives if I thought that packaging quality inferred anything about the quality of the knife.
Hinderer ships knives in cardboard boxes with some foam peanuts. That's more than enough for me.