The Hunted: shoes worn?

Joined
Nov 7, 2001
Messages
11
Watching the movie "The Hunted", I noticed that the "tracking shoes" (the soleless ones) worn by Tommy Lee Jones and Benicio Del Toro look like production shoes. Does anyone know anything about those particular shoes? There is no mention of them or the manufacturer/supplier in the credits.
 
I noticed that too. When they were first mentioned, I figured they would be some type of moccasin. But when you actually saw them, they looked kinda black and tactical. Sure would be nice in quiet in the woods!
 
I have not seen the movie yet, but sounds like a shoe I used to wear. Converse still makes a black high top wrestling sneaker that has only the slightest of patterns, nothing that shows up on the ground. I carried a pair as my "Get Away" shoes while in Special Forces, and when I went to David Scott-Donelan's Tactical Tracking Course. I ended up putting in a sorbathane (?) insole as there is no cushioning at all. With the pads in they worked fine and I used them to sleep in and to swim with fins in warmer water. Much better then wet suit booties, especially when you come out of the water to hit a target or climb a caving ladder on a ship take down.
 
I have not seen the movie but Converse still makes a black, high top wrestling sneaker, that has an almost smooth sole. I carried/wore it for years in Special Forces as my "Get Away" shoes. I also used it when I was at David Scott Donelan's excellent Tactical Tracking Course. I put Sorbathane (?) insoles in the sneakers as there is no cushioning, then then worked fine.
 
Nike and Asics make a really nice wrestling shoe with very little tread. These have been the best in my experience. They both use and all leather upper and what isn't leather is a heavy duty canvas. I've worn them every day for the last 10 years and these two seem to last the longest. The soles get really soft and quiet after about a week of wear.
Or you can go the moccasin rout. Here a link to a really good guy, makes a great product. I've gotten 4 pare from him so far.

http://www.mountainpeoplefootwear.com/

And there is Carl Dyer. I have never ordered from him but I hear he is pretty good.

http://www.carldyers.com/

Hope this helps. But remember, there is nothing that won't leave a track. It's more in the foot than the shoe.

Ric
 
I don't think they are what were used in the movie and am not sure how long they would last but how about a pair of felt sole wading type boots? The felt sole would make a less notacable mark then most treads I would think and they would probly be quiet also. Just a thought, you guys think they might work or not?
 
When I was on location, the costume department asked us how slippery the waterfall and rocks were after we finished scouting the area for safety. It was very slippery before the crew did their remarkable job making everything safe for the stunt/actors. Anyway, the costumer mentioned lining the soles with felt. I'm not sure if they eventually did that.

I jumped around on the cliffs with my Merrells...
:)
--Rafael--
----------
---------
--------
 
Originally posted by ToddG
~A tad pricey though.

Yeah, they seem spendy. On the surface, $230.00 is a lot for a pair of mocs. But, (and I say this never having owned or worn a pair of Russells) they do seem to be well constructed and if they are what the company advertised them to be, they should last a long time if not a lifetime. Most high qualitly leather footwear will last if given the proper care and maintanence. Additionally, you are paying for the name to some degree and the fact that there are a lot of options, especially for mocs. Those potential options make them a very good choice if you are looking to customize your shoes.
 
230 ain't so bad for custom boots. Other custom makers charge 500 for shoes and 800 to 1200 for boots.
 
Good grief! If anyone thought the Russells were pricey, those are twice as much or more. I guess name recognition via Hollywood commands a steep premium.:rolleyes:
 
Wow! Footwear is pricey, as well as counterproductive.

I'm glad I have the good sense to do my stalking and tracking barefoot.
 
Barefoot? Sounds like a good ide---

Owww! Blasted briars!

Accursed stick!

Danged pebble!

I guess I just don't have the heart of a tracker.

(Edit: Or the feet.)
 
Zal, have no worries, if you want to track/stalk with shoes on, you're in good company.

Mike, I know where you are coming from but, you know as well as I do that there is a time and a place for barefoot as well as "shoed" tracking. As in all things, the situation dictates.
 
Spearhead,

Yes, of course, there's a proper time and place for each. Sadly, most people think of the proper time for shoes and boots as "always" and the proper place for them as "everywhere", and the proper time for bare feet as "never" and the proper place as "nowhere". I see footwear as being a tool best used only for certain special circumstances, such as compensation for severe foot problems, or for ice climbing, or for hiking on aa-aa. Putting on shoes or boots for every step one takes is absurdity, kind of like carrying a turned-on high-powered spotlight in your hand at all times, and pointing it everywhere you look, day or night. Evolution and/or G-d (you decide) gave most everybody potentially highly functional feet, not fragile, useless appendages which need to be carefully coddled against the world.

While shoes have a time and a place, most everybody, the vast majority of the time, would be better off barefoot. Even for special circumstances which call for footwear, people would usually be better off with the minimum footwear than with the maximum (i.e., socks with no shoes over them in bitter cold, moccasins or light sandals for aa-aa, etc.)

The loss of foot strength, flexibility, ability to feel the ground, and ability to walk properly, which come from the overuse of footwear, are way more problematic and potentially dangerous than bare feet, for ordinary walks in the woods, mountains, deserts, and swamps. They also make for the loss of a significant portion of the sensory experience of the great outdoors.

The time and place for shoes and boots is rare enough that I have been able to get by without them (except for a brief attempt at being shod, more than a decade ago) for all of my outdoors activities, my whole life.

--Mike
 
Josh,

I've done plenty of barefoot walking over bull thistle, goat heads, stinging nettles, dead bees, poison oak, aa-aa, snow and ice, shattered glass, etc. Walking over thistle barefoot is not my preference, and I'd say it qualifies as the type of special circumstance where moccasins or light sandals are appropriate and advisable tools (though it is do-able, bare foot, if you take the time to get your feet used to the outdoors). Even so, it would be silly to put on high-ankle supported, steel-shanked, deep treaded, insulating, waterproof and shock absorbent super-boots to walk over this, as so many people would.

And your feet really can handle a lot more than you seem to give them credit for, if you just give them the opportunity and take the time to adjust.

--Mike
 
Back
Top