- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
- Messages
- 4,464
This may properly be better suited to the wilderness pages, and the moderators will judge if it should be moved! During this bloody pandemic, locked down in the inner city, I've been torturing myself by re-reading 'Woodcraft', by Nessmuk. It really got me thinking about that evergreen topic here on BF - 'if you could only take one knife etc'.
Granted, it is mostly a fantasy topic, and most of us are happy to join in with the game, but Nessmuk got me thinking nonetheless. My favourite chapter in that classic book is Chapter VIII - A ten days' trip in the wilderness - going it alone. Here is how George W. Sears equipped himself:
'One afternoon I carefully packed the knapsack and organized for a long woods tramp. I took little stock in that trail, or the three days' notion as to time. I made calculations on losing the trail the first day, and being out a full week. The outfit consisted of rifle, hatchet, compass, blanket-bag, knapsack and knife. For rations, one loaf of bread, two quarts of meal, two pounds of pork, one pound of sugar, with tea, salt etc., and a supply of jerked venison. One tin dish, twelve rounds of ammunition and the bullet-molds, filled the list, and did not make a heavy load.' [my bold]
Sears, as well as being the pioneer of ultra-light camping, measured 5'3" and weighed 104lbs. I think the passage speaks for itself, and far more eloquently argues the point of preparation than I could ever do. Notice where his knife comes on that outfitting list?
In the end, Nessmuk's trek across Michigan in the mid-19th century passed uneventfully, but it clearly had a profound effect on him, and he closes the chapter with these words:
'Nothing but the exceptionally fine, dry weather rendered such a trip possible in a wilderness so cut up with swamps, lakes, marshes and streams. A week of steady rain or a premature snow storm - either likely enough at that season - would have been most disastrous; while a forest fire like that of '56, and later ones, would simply have proved fatal.
Reader, if ever you are tempted to make a similar thoughtless, reckless trip - don't do it.' [my bold]
Granted, it is mostly a fantasy topic, and most of us are happy to join in with the game, but Nessmuk got me thinking nonetheless. My favourite chapter in that classic book is Chapter VIII - A ten days' trip in the wilderness - going it alone. Here is how George W. Sears equipped himself:
'One afternoon I carefully packed the knapsack and organized for a long woods tramp. I took little stock in that trail, or the three days' notion as to time. I made calculations on losing the trail the first day, and being out a full week. The outfit consisted of rifle, hatchet, compass, blanket-bag, knapsack and knife. For rations, one loaf of bread, two quarts of meal, two pounds of pork, one pound of sugar, with tea, salt etc., and a supply of jerked venison. One tin dish, twelve rounds of ammunition and the bullet-molds, filled the list, and did not make a heavy load.' [my bold]
Sears, as well as being the pioneer of ultra-light camping, measured 5'3" and weighed 104lbs. I think the passage speaks for itself, and far more eloquently argues the point of preparation than I could ever do. Notice where his knife comes on that outfitting list?
In the end, Nessmuk's trek across Michigan in the mid-19th century passed uneventfully, but it clearly had a profound effect on him, and he closes the chapter with these words:
'Nothing but the exceptionally fine, dry weather rendered such a trip possible in a wilderness so cut up with swamps, lakes, marshes and streams. A week of steady rain or a premature snow storm - either likely enough at that season - would have been most disastrous; while a forest fire like that of '56, and later ones, would simply have proved fatal.
Reader, if ever you are tempted to make a similar thoughtless, reckless trip - don't do it.' [my bold]