The New Work Sharp “Angle Set” Sharpener: Review & Sharpmaker Comparison

AFAustin

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
2,488
This is a review of the new V (actually, inverted V) Work Sharp “Angle Set” manual sharpener, the newest collaboration between Work Sharp and Ken Onion. (A very nice review by ssgwhite was also recently posted here: https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/the-new-work-sharp-angle-set-knife-sharpener.1685861/). I’m going to do something a little different here and give you my bottom line first, and then delve into the details second.

As compared with the "hall of fame" V sharpener, the Spyderco Sharpmaker:

1) Angle Set wins (big time) on price/value;

2) It's a draw on portability;

3) Sharpmaker wins (close call) on ease of use;

4) Sharpmaker wins (for my needs at least) on grit selection;

5) Angle Set wins on versatility.

(I’m going to be doing a lot of comparisons between the Angle Set and the Sharpmaker, so from here on I’ll often refer to them as the AS and the SM.)

Now on to the details!

I had the good fortune to be one of the folks asked by Work Sharp to be an Early Reviewer of a few of its new about-to-be-released manual knife sharpeners (which I believe, as of the date of this posting, are now available). The most prominent of these is the Angle Set Sharpener, and that’s the subject of this review.

Let me preface this by saying I’ve been a Work Sharp fan since buying their original powered knife sharpener in 2011. I never had any skill at sharpening and the Work Sharp was a game changer for me. For the first time, I could put a quality edge on just about any knife I owned. I later got to be a tester of the Ken Onion prototype, and I found that its significant improvements made the powered sharpener much better, more versatile, and more user friendly. So, I confess to being a Work Sharp fan and a believer in their products. That said, the Work Sharp folks made clear that what they were asking for on the early reviews of the new manual sharpeners was an honest opinion, and I assured them that’s what they would get. So, I will do my best to describe the features of the Angle Set sharpener and what I like and what I don’t.

I also want to say I am, and have been for a long time, a huge fan of V sharpeners. Their simple genius is that all you need to do in order to obtain a sharp edge is hold the knife straight up and down and maintain that angle as you sharpen. The late great A.G. Russell has a video on his website which describes the originator of V sharpeners as a man named Louis Graves, who convinced A.G. to try out his invention. A.G. was impressed by it, and after convincing Mr. Graves to change the angle from 45 degrees to 30 (inclusive, i.e., 15 per side), he knew he had a winner.

While I think a V sharpener, even with diamond or CBN rods, is a tough way to set or reset a bevel, or do any significant repairs to a chipped or deformed edge, it is my favorite method for maintaining an edge once those more difficult chores are performed by a more aggressive sharpener, which for me is the Work Sharp Ken Onion (or the WSKO with Blade Grinder attachment for larger blades).

There are a few different V sharpeners on the market: the Spyderco Sharpmaker, the Idahone models, A.G. Russell’s variations, and the Lansky versions are the ones I’m familiar with. The one I own, though, and the one I suspect most readers here own, is the Spyderco Sharpmaker. So, it is natural that much of what I have to say about the new Work Sharp Angle Set will be by way of comparisons with the Sharpmaker.


I. Initial Impressions and Set-up

The Angle Set comes in a sturdy and attractive box, typical of Work Sharp packaging. The contents are few and simple—the plastic base and cover, the “Tri-Brasive Rods” assembly, a tapered ceramic rod which can be attached for serration sharpening, and a brief instruction paper. There’s also a demo video on the Work Sharp website: https://www.worksharptools.com/user-resources-outdoor/#anchor-angleset

The initial impression is that it is a quality piece and appears sturdy and well made. Everything fits together well, and the Tri-Brasive Rods assembly attaches securely to the base via magnets (a very clever innovation). The Tri-Brasive Rods assembly itself feels sturdy and well put together and has a good feel when you twist the rods to reach the different surfaces. The rods don’t lock into place as you twist them, which some have seen as a disadvantage, but I don’t. First of all, while they don’t lock, they’re not at all loose, and the amount of resistance seems just right to me and I’ve had no issue with their not staying in position while I sharpen. And secondly, the ability to “fine tune” the rod positions offers some advantages, as discussed in Part II. below.

AxeslNGl.jpg


K6egpGHl.jpg


N79zugcl.jpg


FrGZTinl.jpg


e1ZhZgll.jpg



One piece that looks like it might be a little weak is the latch on top which joins the right and left side covers and keeps the whole kit closed. I haven’t had any trouble with it but I wouldn’t carry the closed unit upside down, or at least if I did, I’d keep my hand firmly closed over the latch.

031wOgCl.jpg



The different and clever part of the AS is the rotating “Tri-Brasive Rods” assembly and how it sets up in the tray. Each rod has 3 rotating surfaces: medium diamond, fine diamond, and fine ceramic. (There’s some terminology inconsistency here in that, at the time I received the kit, in various places on the box, in the instructions, and on the Work Sharp website, the diamonds are described as “medium and fine”, “coarse and medium”, and “coarse and fine”. The box describes them as 400 grit and 800 grit, and from here on out, I’ll refer to them as “medium” and “fine” as I think that’s probably the most accurate.)

8fTLbDRl.jpg


JbzHRSVl.jpg



When I first looked at the rods, they looked slightly wider than the Sharpmaker rods, but when I measured them, I saw I was wrong—they’re both ½" wide. As to working surface, the Angle Set rods have an abrasive surface 5 7/8" long. The SM rods are 7" long but once seated in their slots, it’s 6 1/4", so a slight edge to the SM there but one that isn’t really noticed in use.

The sharpening angle is determined by into which slots in the base you insert the prongs at the base of the rods. A nice feature is the large number of choices: 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, and 25 degrees (per side). Basically, there are 3 slots on each side, for 15, 20, and 25 degrees. For 17.5, you put one leg in the 15 slot and the other in the 20 slot. Similarly, for 22.5, you put one leg in the 20 slot and the other in the 25.

CvVhRfpl.jpg



An ingenious innovation on the AS is the way the rod assembly attaches to the slots—with magnets installed in each slot. The magnets seem to be just the right strength—strong enough to hold the assembly securely, but not so strong as to make detaching the legs a chore. And a big advantage with the magnets is that they eliminate the problem of “slop” when dealing with rods inserted into holes, as can be a problem with other V sharpeners, including the SM. These rods hold steady in their positions, with no wobble at all.

The base has four thick rubber non skid pads on the underside—one at each corner—and that’s a welcome feature. (The SM lacks these, so I keep mine on a leather pad.)

4igKP9Kl.jpg
 
Last edited:
II. Using the Angle Set (in general)

An initial issue is how to hold and steady the base with your off hand. The instructions provide some guidance: on your off hand side, open the lid to approximately 90 degrees (straight up), and it will then slide out and off. Flip it over and re-insert, likewise at about 90 degrees. Fold it down and you now have something to safely grab onto.

vQk9Ms2l.jpg



Or, if you want to avoid even this minor hassle, you can leave the lid attached as it normally is and hold onto it in a couple of different ways (see pics below). (You can’t, however, hold it down flat when it’s normally attached, as that raises the base off the work surface.)

A6JXfgpl.jpg


OMKNYbel.jpg



One of the first things that jumps out at you about the AS’s construction is that it’s not actually a “V sharpener”, like every other model I’ve seen, but rather an inverted V. And there’s another difference as well, at least in comparison to the SM: the distances between the left and right sharpening surfaces are a little greater in the AS. With both sharpeners set at 15 degrees, the gap between surfaces for the SM are 1" at the narrowest part and 1 15/16" for the AS. At the widest part, it’s 4 1/4" for the SM and 4 3/4" for the AS. What this means is that with the AS, you have to adjust your body position a little more as you move between the right strokes and the left strokes. For me that means that while with the SM I stand in the same position as I go through the entire sharpening process, with the AS I need to shift my body a bit to the left when I stroke on the left rod. This bothers me a little, but I’m experimenting with a small “fix”. As mentioned, the different AS rod surfaces don’t lock into place but rather are twisted incrementally from one surface to the next. While some could see this as a disadvantage as you need to eyeball the surface to make sure it’s in a straight and flat position, I see advantages, for example in dealing with the body position issue. Instead of positioning the left rod exactly perpendicular to your body, you can twist it slightly inward and in that way avoid having to change your body position. I’ve actually been experimenting with slightly moving the surface position of both rods to see what’s most comfortable. After all, there’s no rule that the surface has to be positioned in a certain spot, but rather you simply need to pay attention to making sure that your blade edge is flat to the rod surface as you stroke.

There’s another aspect of the inverted V design that has consequences, and this one may be more bothersome than the one mentioned above. The design of the AS requires a different---and slightly longer---motion when alternating between rods, as compared to the SM. With the SM, you just move the blade back and forth the very short distance inside the rods. With the AS, you have to either raise the blade up and over the inverted V, or else pull the blade back, to the side, and forward to get to the other rod. It’s a little more hassle and effort, especially if you're alternating every stroke, and it slows down the sharpening process. And if you’re not careful, you’ll occasionally bump the blade on the assembly, which is annoying and won’t do your edge any good, either.


III. Using the Angle Set ( a few brief trials)

The first knife I actually sharpened on the AS was one of my wife’s kitchen knives. My wife is a wonderful cook but isn’t a knife snob by any means. Years ago I bought her a pair of Victorinox/Forschner 6" chef’s knives and she happily uses them 90% of the time (and I agree, as do many reviewers, that they’re at the top of the budget kitchen knife class). They are a breeze to keep sharp with their thin blade stock, and I typically give them a touch up every week or two. I always do this on my SM, and the routine is simple—I use the brown medium rods (15 degree/side) and if they need just a very minor touch up, I use the flats only. If they need a little more attention, I start with the corners and then finish on the flats.

So, this time I took one of her Vics in need of a tune up and gave it a go on the AS. I could see that using only the fine ceramic wouldn’t be enough, so I started on the fine diamond. I got her edge back on the diamond and then set about polishing it up a bit with the fine ceramic. What I found is that, not surprisingly, there’s a significant gap between the fine diamond and the fine ceramic, and even after quite a bit of time on the ceramic, the edge was still toothier and a little rougher than what I normally get with my SM routine. I kept going with the ceramic a while longer, but progress refining the edge was very slow. Finally, I called it quits and switched to the flats of the medium rods on my SM. Very quickly I got the edge I wanted—fairly refined with just a bit of tooth in it.

My next test was to dig out from my “guinea pig box” a couple of cheap kitchen knives that were similar to what you get when you volunteer to sharpen your friend or family member’s long neglected kitchen knives—very dull with numerous small and medium chips. With these I did the full “Tri-Brasive” sequence: medium diamond, fine diamond, and then fine ceramic. The process went well and a decent edge was put on the knives. Two caveats, though: First, while the medium diamond reduced the chips, it would’ve taken more time than I was willing to spend to work them out completely. The truth is, I’m spoiled by the WSKO, which can take care of chips quickly and efficiently. The second thing is what I mentioned before: there’s a sizeable gap between the fine diamond and the fine ceramic, and I ended up with pretty toothy final results. I guess I eventually could’ve gotten more refined edges if I really invested the time on the fine ceramics, but I was more interested in what is practical and convenient with my testing and not what is possible if you’re willing to work forever.

A final “test” was simply to use the AS in the way I use my SM most commonly of all---to touch up my rotation folders. I baby my knives and typically maintain a semi-polished edge on them. For those knives, then, the SM medium ceramic isn’t usually necessary. Rather, a few swipes on either the fine or ultra-fine SM rods, followed by a few passes on a strop, and I’m done. So, for daily maintenance on my rotation knives, simply leaving the AS set up and indexed to the fine ceramic rods is a great solution.

I should point out that the SM also has a similar large gap between grits, but at a different place in the spectrum. With the SM, it’s between the diamond or CBN rods (I have the CBN but my understanding is that the diamond rods are similar) and the medium stones. As I mentioned, the way I use my SM is not for heavy duty sharpening but rather just for touch ups, so that gap isn’t as big a deal to me because I don’t use the CBN rods much (but instead the WSKO). I should mention that Sal has said the CBN and diamond rods are 400 mesh, same as the AS medium diamond surfaces are described on the box. My CBN rods look and feel a little finer than the AS medium diamonds, but that may be because my CBNs are broken in.


IV. Misc. Points

Given the structure of the Tri-Brasive rods, there’s not the same option of using the corners for more aggressive sharpening as is possible with the SM triangular rods. There is, however, a small bit of “corner” that protrudes from the mounting surface of the AS rods, so by twisting the rod assembly you can in fact do a limited amount of “corner” sharpening if you’re so inclined. But it’s not a full substitute for the corner sharpening you can do with the SM.

The AS includes a small tapered ceramic rod for serrations. This is a handy little addition which attaches by means of a small cylinder that slides down into a hole at the top of the rod assembly. As you stroke it, though, it does have a little “give”. I’m not much of a serrated knives guy, but I did have one I tried it out on and it seemed to work OK.

cbhETNel.jpg



Finally, and very significantly, the fact that the AS has five different angle settings is really nice. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a V sharpener with more than two, and of course that’s what the SM has. I guess 15 and 20 degrees are the most commonly used angles, but the additional settings are a great feature.
 
Last edited:
V. Five Points and Conclusion

To wrap this up I’m going to come full circle and address my 5 “bottom line” points which kicked off this review.

1) Price/Value

I think the AS is a clear winner here over the SM, and over the other V sharpeners with which I’m familiar. Retail on the AS is $49.95 (with free shipping available at certain online retailers) and considering what you get, that’s a screaming bargain. Three different stones, including 2 diamond, along with five different sharpening angles, topped off with excellent build quality and innovative design, is truly a lot for the money.

Last time I checked, SMs were going for about $68 shipped, and the basic unit includes only two stones, the medium and fine ceramics. Add a set of diamond or CBN rods for about $53, and you’re looking at $121 for a 3 stone kit. So, on price/ value, it’s not even close. In fact, if you have a SM and are thinking of adding a set of diamond or CBN stones, a better option might be to just get the AS instead. It would come out a few dollars cheaper, you’d have two different grits of diamonds, and you’d have a whole additional sharpening kit!

2) Portability

4-15-20 Update: I originally gave the nod on "Portability" to the AS because for some reason I had it in my mind that only one set of rods could be stored inside the SM (it's been a long time since I actually carried my SM anywhere!), while the entire three-rod assembly stores neatly inside the AS. But SpyderPhreak in his post below pointed out that on the SM, you can actually fit two sets of rods in the clamps---one on top (over the brass safety rods) and one on the side.

While it may not be necessary---and isn’t mentioned in the AS instructions or on the Work Sharp website---I like a bit of lubricant on diamond (or CBN) rods. I use either a small spray bottle filled with water with a drop of dish soap added or a dropper bottle with same (which allows for placing a drop on top of the rod and letting it slide down the length). It makes the sharpening smoother and I‘ve read that it helps protect the embedded particles. So, that may be one external item you need to pack if you use this, but of course if you’re carrying the diamond or CBN rods with the SM, you’re in the same position. (You don’t really need to cart this along at all—your friend or family member will no doubt have dish soap and water you can mix in a small bowl and apply with your finger.)

As for size, the AS is actually noticeably larger than the SM, both closed and opened. But because of the nifty way in which all the rods are stored inside, the AS is also very portable and easily stored.

So, the AS carries three sets of rods inside and the SM two. But the SM is smaller in size. I'm calling "Portability" a draw.

YgwCsHNl.jpg


CBPUbuVl.jpg


EwUfbpTl.jpg



3) Ease of Use

This is a close call, but I give the nod to the SM. What the AS has going for it is that, due to its innovative way of attaching the rods via strong magnets, slop or wiggle is eliminated. This can be a problem with the SM, although it can be mitigated (I have some Scotch tape wrapped around the base of some of my SM rods) (and full disclosure: when I first got my SM, some of the rods barely fit into the holes so I opened them up a bit and it’s possible I overdid it!).

In addition, the AS gets a point for how easy it is to change the sharpening surfaces simply by turning the rods—easier than removing and re-inserting the rods in the SM. (Since I use my SM mainly for touch ups with just one set of rods already installed, this isn’t a big issue for me personally.)

Where the AS loses points is with the issues caused by the inverted V structure. As I outlined above, the greater distance between rods requires more body movement, or other adjustment, as you go from right to left rod. But most significantly, the necessity of taking the blade over the top of the assembly or around the front of it as you switch between rods, is a little awkward and slows down the sharpening process.

4) Grit Selection

The AS loses out to the SM here, at least for how I use them. As I mentioned, for me a V sharpener is for touch ups, and I just don’t like the large gap with the AS between the fine diamond and fine ceramic. Not only does the SM have the advantage here due to its medium ceramic rods, but the advantage is enhanced by the ability to more easily use the corners on the SM rods, thus in effect giving you an additional step before getting to the more aggressive diamond or CBN rods.

In sum, what I want from a V sharpener is a closer grit progression on the lower end of the spectrum—not the upper end—so that’s why the SM wins here. I would much rather have two grades of ceramic than two grades of diamond, so for me a better solution for the AS would be fine diamond + medium ceramic + fine ceramic. I realize this is all based on how I use my V sharpener, so others may see it differently.

5) Versatility

The AS wins here. As I said above, I’d prefer a different grit selection for my purposes, but there’s no denying that the AS’s current one gives it versatility points. I’m guessing that when most of us take a sharpener on the road, it will likely be doing some heavier work than just touch ups. For example, if a family member asked me to bring something to sharpen their kitchen knives next time I visited, I’d probably pick the AS. Not only is it extremely portable and easy to transport, but that family member’s knives are likely to need at least some moderate sharpening, and the two levels of diamonds will come in very handy.

And as far as versatility, another big factor is the 5 different sharpening angles the AS affords. That’s just a great feature and ices the cake when it comes to versatility.

Conclusion

My final assessment is that the Angle Set is a very innovative, well built, and versatile “in between” sharpener—and a terrific bargain to boot. What I mean by “in between” is that, even with the heavy diamond emphasis, it will of course never be as fast and effective for bevel setting or edge repairs as something like the Work Sharp Ken Onion powered system. And on the other end of the spectrum, as presently constituted, it can’t beat the Sharpmaker for touch ups and edge refinement due to the lack of a medium grit ceramic.

But what it can do is be a heckuva all round kit to take on camping, hunting, or fishing trips, or when you go visit friends and family who would appreciate a quick “in home” sharpening of their kitchen knives. The diamonds will give you the ability to modestly rehab any neglected and abused blades, and if you end up giving them a toothy but decently sharp edge, non-knife folks will likely be happy campers.

In addition, thanks to the easy store-ability and bargain price, the AS would be a very handy item to have in your kitchen, fast and easy to grab and use either when the ceramic is sufficient or if you don’t mind a little diamond toothiness.

I haven’t had the AS very long, and it may be that as I use it and get to know it better, my thoughts will evolve. But I’ve already seen enough to know it’s another innovative and high quality product from Work Sharp, and I bet they sell a boatload of them.

Finally, I think I should answer this question: Would I buy the Angle Set? While it doesn’t replace the Sharpmaker for my personal needs, it’s a different critter with its own advantages. Moreover, the AS is so innovative, so well made, so versatile, and such a screaming bargain, that I wouldn’t be able to resist adding it to my sharpening arsenal. So, in a word, yes!

LRnKyGkl.jpg
 
Last edited:
Awesome detailed comparison review!
i couldn't have done it better.

I'm going to read it on a solitary evening for sure:thumbsup:
 
How does/can it handle a recurved blade the way a SM does? Is it possible to rotate the diamonds in a way that a recurved folder or blade in general can be sharpened?
 
I like the Work Sharp AS but I don't consider it a serious sharpening system because it is too small. The stones are so skinny that it is difficult to keep a blade flat against the stones unless you are sharpening a pen knife or a small pocket knife. If the stones were at least a half inch wider and a couple of inches taller it would be a fine sharpening system IMHO.
You do not have to adjust your position or move the AS while you are sharpening your knife if you adjust the stones so that you just reach straight toward the AS. So I am glad that the stones don't lock into place.
But it is too small to use much unless you just have it for when you are away from home or in the woods.
 
2) Portability

The AS wins here, too. The beauty of the AS is how the Tri-Abrasive assembly folds up neatly into the base, close the covers and you’re ready to go. With the SM, only one set of rods fits into the slots on the side, so if you want to take more, you need to pack them separately—and this is complicated by the fragility of the ceramic stones.
FYI, on the SM, you can store a set of stones above the guard rods if you push the guard rods down all the way into their storage slots in the base. This means you can carry both sets of ceramic stones inside of the base.

Excellent and thorough review! :thumbsup:
 
^ yes, this is how the SharpMaker is delivered from the factory. I've used mine like this for... umm.... at least 7 years now.

Brian.
 
How does/can it handle a recurved blade the way a SM does? Is it possible to rotate the diamonds in a way that a recurved folder or blade in general can be sharpened?

Sort of. Here's what I said under "Misc. Points": There is, however, a small bit of “corner” that protrudes from the mounting surface of the AS rods, so by twisting the rod assembly you can in fact do a limited amount of “corner” sharpening if you’re so inclined. But it’s not a full substitute for the corner sharpening you can do with the SM.
 
FYI, on the SM, you can store a set of stones above the guard rods if you push the guard rods down all the way into their storage slots in the base. This means you can carry both sets of ceramic stones inside of the base.

SpyderPhreak, thanks for pointing that out. It's been a long time since I've actually carried my SM anywhere, and I either forgot that feature long ago or never noticed it. I've revised my review, and am now calling "Portability" a draw.

Thanks again (and good lookin' chocolate Labbie in you avator :thumbsup:).

Andrew
 
SpyderPhreak, thanks for pointing that out. It's been a long time since I've actually carried my SM anywhere, and I either forgot that feature long ago or never noticed it. I've revised my review, and am now calling "Portability" a draw.

Thanks again (and good lookin' chocolate Labbie in you avator :thumbsup:).

Andrew
You're welcome Andrew, glad I could help. :)

Another thing I got to thinking of that I didn't see in your review (I could have possibly missed it) is how the SM can be flipped over and the two stones set side-by-side into the notches on the bottom of the base to create a "benchstone" from the two flat surfaces sitting next to each other. I love that feature, and use it more than I ever thought I would.

That's my last Chocolate, Kona. Unfortunately, she passed unexpectedly and suddenly on Valentines Day a few years ago. :( We miss her.
 
SpyderPhreak, that's interesting that you mention the SM "bench stone" feature. I confess I've never really used that---maybe because it seems awkward to me, or maybe because I have almost no freehand skills!

So sorry about Kona. We've likewise loved and lost many pups over the years---and still miss every one.

Andrew
 
WOW! Awesome review, thank you for taking the time describing and comparing the two systems. I currently own a Ken Onion Worksharp with the tool attachment and to my shame I never put it to real work, I instead use a Wicked Edge with a full set of stones, Diamond Lapping films and a full set of strops. What I discovered in the last month or so (given the Covid-19 outbreak) is that I don't have the time needed to set-up either system for a quick touch-up. My work in healthcare keeps me busy and I spend many more hours away from home and time "playing" is at a premium so I needed a quick touch-up "something". I was looking at the two systems used in your review but had a hard time deciding between them. While my thoughts were leaning towards the AS with it's multi-angle feature, your detailed review swayed me to the SM side even considering the price difference when the finer rods are added to the bundle.
If there was a wish column, I'd wish for SM to make a aftermarket base with different angles or for AS to make available a secondary set of "rods" ,for lack of a better term, with different grits. For now, I'm headed to SharpeningSupplies for a SM and several rods.
Thank you again, stay safe and stay healthy.
 
brewbear, thanks for your post and kind comments, and I'm glad you found the review helpful.

And for your work in healthcare, I believe we all thank you!

Andrew
 
Thanks for the great review!
I have the SM with a set of diamond rods added. My choice of steels leans to M390 and D2. Diamond is much easier to work M390 with but 400 grit is way too much even with light pressure. I am hopping the "fine" diamond on the AS will give me this. I just ordered one and should have it in a couple days.
If this doesn't work I may need to have some 800 and 1200 grit diamond rods made for my SM. I just don't want to spend the time to breakout a "setup" to sharpen a knife.
 
Just for follow up in case anyone finds themselves here like I did.
Got the Work Sharp Angle Set sharpener a couple days ago. It was what I hoped it would be. Good higher grit diamond and the angle adjust-ability is really handy. Also I like the rotating posts. I found that not fully rotating them "square" worked very well for ease of sharpening. I understand that this means that the angle changes with wrist movement but it suites my need to quickly sharpen my daily beater. I have some knives I wouldn't use on this but for everyday use, it works well, especially for the modest cost.
I give it a 10 on the "bang for the buck" scale. Your millage may vary...
 
dazzleaj, thanks for your posts. I likewise have found the fine diamond on the Angle Set handy when the Sharpmaker brown ceramics aren't quite enough. And the Angle Set really is a great value for the money.

Andrew
 
Back
Top