The Revenant. Movie firecraft fact or fiction?

Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
1,516
I only saw the movie once and don't have a photographic memory, not by a long short. That said I noticed the main character started a fire using a carbon steel implement, in that case a fork, dry grass and blackpowder. So that got me thinking.

1. Would that method actually work?

2. Is it historically plausible?

How to test it. I took just a carbon steel knife and black power into the woods with the intent of starting a fire. I assume a mountain man would find his own rocks and once the fire got started then add kindling and progressively larger wood. However I wanted to keep within the confines of the movie or at least how I remember it. So that meant no other tinder beyond dry grass and black powder to start the initial flames. All materials except for the carbon steel implament, in this case a knife and black powder would need to be foraged during the outing. I would use the simplest means to start the fire possible. No saw, axe or any other tool. No complex prep and the actual prep time would have to reflect the least amount of effort for the fastest results.

The Revenant firecraft challenge: Go into the woods with just a carbon steel implement and blackpowder, use only grass/powder as tinder to start the initial flames. Use fire prep to reflect a reduced physical capability and dire need. All items beyond the carbon steel and powder must be foraged during the outing.

It's a GO!



The methodology employed in the movie is traditional flint and steel which differs from the more modern ferro rod. I would need a rock in order to toss sparks from the carbon steel knife. Some rocks work and other don't. In general if the rock is hard and can take an edge it could produce sparks from carbon steel. Flint, chert and quartz comes to mind. For me often quartz is the easiest to find as it really stands out. I prefer to look in areas of drainage as often the dirt and leaves are washed away exposing the rocks.



Sure enough we are in luck.



Nice day. It was clear but never did seem to go above freezing.





Ordinary these beech leaves would attract my interest however the rules of The Revenant firecraft are that dry grass is to be used. Dry grass isn't my prefered tinder.



And yes no birch bark. Really! Darn.



There is it! The dry grass of Hollywood fame! Not all dry grass is exactly dry. I avoid the parts of the grass in contact with the ground or other plants such as the lower stems and roots. Naturally given the numerous strands it's hard to be perfect at it.





I am going to use these taller weeds for kindling if the grass takes flames.



Also will use other progressly larger fuels. Probably common knowledge at the time for those making a living in the woods. That said most people used flint and steel to start their fires back in the day. Maybe those in cities used brimstone matches but that process too employed flint and steel. All of the above is IMHO as no expert on the history. Wonderful day but still being February meant there was a chill in the air.





I would need to process that quartz using stone age technology and sloppily at that.



Some nice flakes with sharp edges. Quartz doesn't seem to hold an edge as long compared to flint or chert but for a short time it will toss some nice sparks from carbon steel.



Time to get the show on the road. Is there some fact behind Hollywood or just pure fiction? The carbon steel, black powder, rocks and grass are ready!



The simple fire fuel prep was done. No platform with raised back. No split wood or feathers. Could I have done this fire prep if attacked by bears, indians and hypothermia? I would probably just go belly up but it sure didn't take much time to prepare the fuel. Naturally I would need more to burn this fire all night but right now just going for sustaining flames as proof of concept. On a side note I am not disparaging split wood, shavings, feather sticks or any other methodology. As I don't recall the movie being clear about the prep going to use the simplest method as a base line.



Yes it works. In fact was more spectacular than I remember in the movie.



Conclusion:

Based on actually doing it my conclusion is yes. The method works. It is necessary to put the powder on a leaf or other surface as it drifts through the grass pile but it easily took a spark from a knife struck by a rock. Grass isn't my favorite tinder but after the initial flash of the powder it was easily blown into flames. Those flames then ignited progressively larger kindling. Though blackpowder was probably a valuable commodity when out in the mountains given the long history of it's use and even longer history of flint and steel it is IMHO entirely possible that sometime during those centuries someone could have been compelled to do this. It just seems plausible.

I am no expert on history but it does seem to me The Revenant firecraft is fact (in terms of actually working). Does this mean Hugh Glass used the same method shown in dire circumstance? I don't know. Here is a video showing the entire process including ignition. For those who don't have all day the actual fire starts around 10 minutes into the video.

[video=youtube;9JOuCW8bK3U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JOuCW8bK3U[/video]

Thanks for looking.

addition:

Someone mentioned online in another forum that the knIfe I used in The Revenant firecraft challenge was special and he would have probably used "an ordinary carbon steel knife instead of a steel striker knife (for accuracy)" Ok that's an interesting point worth investigation. In the past I used Mora knives and other improvised strikers to ignite chaga, charcloth and natural charred materials so know they can ignite most flint and steel tinder despite not being dedicated strikers. Always keep in mind that I am a goofy goober so odds are anyone reading this could do the same or even better.

Mora knife, Pyrodex and rock.



Internet Mora, rock and powder challenge to verify internet curiously GO!



Yea it worked and did so in about the same time as initial field test. 5 seconds for the first video and 5 seconds on the second successful attempt in this video. Who would have imagined? Above is a scorched leaf from the second flash over. The video shows both. I have come to the crazy and unprecedented conclusion that gunpowder is indeed flammable and as such is easily ignited hence proof of concept of The Revenant firecraft....once again..... LOL!

[video=youtube;Z1WUpKmNOL0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1WUpKmNOL0[/video]
 
Fun post & nice pictures.
And considering that you've lit 1/10,000 as many fires as Hugh likely had in his life you've proven the method for all of us. (those of us who carry Black Powder anyway.....)

I played with firesteel last summer and found that the dead grass around the bases of clumps of grass tufts found in my woods worked just fine as tinder. But that was with the much stronger firesteel sparks. Using an explosive like Black Powder would make fire a strong possibility with even a weak spark.

Wish you'd tried it without the powder.
 
From memory, and not having seen the movie, but what I remember of the original story, all he had left was his possibles bag, so without a gun, the powder then becomes more useful as tinder. I also recall the story being that he used the spine of a straight razor to get the spark, which makes sense to me, and really the form of the striker is not that important.

Its too bad that so much of the urban firecraft from before matches has gone away. I recall reading something from lee valley tools about specialized tinder planes used to quickly make a large number of shavings, as well as one that made a long tubular curl for lighting candles.
 
Fun post & nice pictures.
And considering that you've lit 1/10,000 as many fires as Hugh likely had in his life you've proven the method for all of us. (those of us who carry Black Powder anyway.....)

I played with firesteel last summer and found that the dead grass around the bases of clumps of grass tufts found in my woods worked just fine as tinder. But that was with the much stronger firesteel sparks. Using an explosive like Black Powder would make fire a strong possibility with even a weak spark.

Wish you'd tried it without the powder.

A knife and rock alone would never ignite dry grass but there is tinder in the woods which could using just that combo. Have a video of me doing that if anyone is interested though probably showed it on this forum before. Or maybe not? I don't remember. Thanks for looking! :)
 
Last edited:
Great info and fun thread. Any excuse to play in the woods huh? :thumbup: :D
 
I thought the movie was awesome as is this post. I can appreciate how long a post such as this takes so thanks a lot buddy for taking the time and effort to share it with us ! 😉👍
 
There was a video a while back where dave cantebury took the test one step further... he actually recreated the fork thingy. :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M-2wCglU9o

It threw sparks. Which I guess makes sense. Flint and steel and all that.

Cool thread. :thumbup:

But did he actually use it to start a fire? Never mind that a blaze employing "the Revenant firecraft methodology" in actual field conditions? LOL! Well we have that right here on bladeforums using what we all like. Knives! Oh wonderful knives! :) I read online after doing this the director decided on the fork over the protests of the historical guides as the person felt the majority of the audience could relate to a fork not an oval striker. To be honest I don't know anything about what someone of that time might have used for an improved striker if they lost their dedicated striker but have no way to verify any of it. Also was unaware DC made the striker. It did look like a neat project. It would have been even more fun if I had that for the experiment however it would work as gun powder is so darn flammable.

Thanks for looking.
 
I thought the movie was awesome as is this post. I can appreciate how long a post such as this takes so thanks a lot buddy for taking the time and effort to share it with us ! 😉👍

Thanks brother. I always appreciated your outing posts for a similar reason beyond them just being enjoyable to view. It takes time to actually do stuff and document it. Much easier for someone to make a "What is the best knife" or "batoning is stupid" thread. Thanks for looking and I appreciate the positive comments.
 
Excellent post and interesting experiment! But you would be correct to take any detail in the movie with a grain of salt. Legend and fact are so intertwined there that it is difficult to know where one leaves off and the other picks up. For instance the few accounts say that he was left with nothing, no possible bag and no powder. Nor knife.

The background story of Hugh Glass has always been an interesting one. I've studied it for more than thirty years. And only on occasion does some new tidbit of actual fact come to light. If you ever get the chance, visit Pinedale's Mountain Man museum. Host to the Annual Green River Rendevous the second weekend of July. As to firestarting, yes t was a known and neccisary art of the trappers and explorers. Hudson Bay Company and the American trappers' company records provide good glimpses of the tools used and traded for firestarting.

http://www.historynet.com/hugh-glass-the-truth-behind-the-revenant-legend.htm/5

http://museumofthemountainman.com/programs/rendezvous/
 
must be some woods, where you are able to "forage" black powder. :-) I'd say you are many times more likely to find a vehicle, use a battery spark and some of the car seat, dipped in gasoline?
 
must be some woods, where you are able to "forage" black powder. :-) I'd say you are many times more likely to find a vehicle, use a battery spark and some of the car seat, dipped in gasoline?

Never said I "forage" the powder. I clearly showed and said the only materials carried into the woods to facilitate that fire were the knife and powder. What I did "forage" was the rocks and dry grass which were the same materials used in the movie to start the fire. Personally I think messing around with hydrocarbons and powder could be risky if compromised. Have you tried to use a battery, car seat and gasoline to start a fire or is this something you seen on TV? Here is what I would do if somehow caught out with no firekit......

[video=youtube;uErjUMECaYU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uErjUMECaYU[/video]

Why? Because I know how to do it. :)
 
Excellent post and interesting experiment! But you would be correct to take any detail in the movie with a grain of salt. Legend and fact are so intertwined there that it is difficult to know where one leaves off and the other picks up. For instance the few accounts say that he was left with nothing, no possible bag and no powder. Nor knife.

The background story of Hugh Glass has always been an interesting one. I've studied it for more than thirty years. And only on occasion does some new tidbit of actual fact come to light. If you ever get the chance, visit Pinedale's Mountain Man museum. Host to the Annual Green River Rendevous the second weekend of July. As to firestarting, yes t was a known and neccisary art of the trappers and explorers. Hudson Bay Company and the American trappers' company records provide good glimpses of the tools used and traded for firestarting.

http://www.historynet.com/hugh-glass-the-truth-behind-the-revenant-legend.htm/5

http://museumofthemountainman.com/programs/rendezvous/

Thanks brother. Great insight!
 
"Back in the day", blackpowder enthusiasts and reenactors practiced many ways of firestarting, most of them involved having one's accoutrements to one extent or another. A flintlock would give a "flash in the pan" by inserting a feather quill in the flashhole and firing the lock to start a fire with just pan powder and the lock flint. Those of us who had caplocks would fire squib loads, reduced powder loads to start a patch on fire. We even carried patches that had black powder rubbed into them as fire starters for flint and striker. That worked too. I'm not sure it would with Pyrodex. We only used black.

If you can find it in a store or online, Charlton Heston makes fire with flint and striker in "Mountain Men" and it is shown fairly well. I seem to remember it done also in the 1978 TV series "Centennial" by Robert Conrad or perhaps Richard Chamberlain. I am sure there were more. Robert Redford in Jeremiah Johnson?
 
Beautiful cinematography in that film.

If I remember correctly it was in wet-cold conditions for most of it, which can make getting the secondary tinder lit very difficult.
 
Back
Top