marcus52AR
Gold Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 4,722
I think the pocket clip had a lot to do with the increasing size of modern folders. I don't see anyone carrying a Millie clipless in the bottom front pocket.
It's just human nature. We don't make things that just work. We make things that work and then think about how to improve them, how to make the cooler, how to make them more fun, more useful, useful in additional ways and on and on.Heres my assessment so far.
First half of the 1900's, balisongs were the main folders carried for the " cool " factor.
Then in 1964 the Buck 110 takes the world by storm and becomes one of the most copied specific folding knives ever.
In the 80's spyderco, first blood, and mall ninjas
1990's tactical folders became a thing
Now most folding knives in the US are modern.
I understand that people like modern folders and I understand what people like about them, but theres still a question in my mind.
The materials an average person cuts during the day haven't changed much, but people's expectations of a pocket knife mostly have and I wonder why.
So is the answer really just that people think they're cool and have gotten used to them ?
Did a lot more people carry belt knives until knives started to become " frowned upon " ?
Heres my assessment so far.
First half of the 1900's, balisongs were the main folders carried for the " cool " factor.
Then in 1964 the Buck 110 takes the world by storm and becomes one of the most copied specific folding knives ever.
In the 80's spyderco, first blood, and mall ninjas
1990's tactical folders became a thing
Now most folding knives in the US are modern.
I understand that people like modern folders and I understand what people like about them, but theres still a question in my mind.
The materials an average person cuts during the day haven't changed much, but people's expectations of a pocket knife mostly have and I wonder why.
So is the answer really just that people think they're cool and have gotten used to them ?
Did a lot more people carry belt knives until knives started to become " frowned upon " ?
Mendezj, I don't necessarily disagree with you, but LUDT (in name) is about as tactical/special ops as you can get.
..... different strokes for different folks. What you like is not wrong nor is what another likes. I grew up surrounded by role models (great uncles and uncles) who were working Stockmen (you would call them cowboys) and they all carried a "traditional" folder, as did I right through school, can't say they ever excited me beyond picking my nails. I actually wish I knew where the couple of Old Timers I had then were now, they just sort of got cast away. My first locking blade knife, can't even recall what it was, in the late 70s or very early 80s made folders appealing. I still prefer a fixed blade knife for about any task but the convenience of a folder is hard to beat. As for modern, I certainly can't say I like them all but I have a few ZTs but think a CRK 21/25 are about perfect in their lines and looks.It seems to me that the average suburbanite may have a lot more boxes to open in a week but overall not face any materials that are any tougher to cut than say 50-60 years ago, so I'm try to understand why the modern folder is so accepted as the idea of what a pocket knife should be when it's typically larger in every dimension than your typical traditional slipjoint.
....because that is not what the majority want....same reason they stopped making the 68 Ponitac body shape, taste and the market changed.You know, why can't it be modern on the inside but look like a '68 Pontiac GTO on the outside.
..... this is the most important thing. No need to apologise for or criticise what you or anyone else likes !!!! It's like Redheads or Brunettes.You do you.
......once they stopped you lot over there getting the G8 you knew the brand was doomed...Also, they don't make pontiacs any more for a reason...
I'm starting to realize that since I'm not into modern folders, I just can't really talk about them without sounding negative.
I have my opinions and don't plan to ever go back to modern folders, and I suppose that right there probably doomed this thread from the start.
I was trying to understand why / how our society let modern folders become what a pocket knife generally is now, but I guess whoever said I should just forget about it and go bskc to enjoying my traditional knives was right and that's what I'll do.
"Back in my day, all we needed was a sharp rock...damn this new-fangled copper craze!"
I like new things. New is often nice.
I also made a stone axe myself, and rehafted a 1000 year old stone axe head and chopped down a small tree with it.
Why? Why not?
And that is the real answer to this thread and many of the others we have here: Why not?
You had sharp rocks growing? Luxury!"Back in my day, all we needed was a sharp rock...damn this new-fangled copper craze!"
I like new things. New is often nice.
I also made a stone axe myself, and rehafted a 1000 year old stone axe head and chopped down a small tree with it.
Why? Why not?
And that is the real answer to this thread and many of the others we have here: Why not?
You had sharp rocks growing? Luxury!
You mean why do some people think new is automatically better when old still gets the job done as well as anythingWait I think I get it now!! Why is new stuff better than old stuff?
My Ladybug is smaller and lighter than the Case Peanut. The steel is sharper and a absolutely stainless (H1) and easy to keep sharp.
I can open in with one hand so I don't have to put down what I"m cutting while I get my knife open and it stays locked open safely till I'm done. The handle is extremely grippy and resists breaking or generally falling apart.
That's why I use it. Old muscle cars are cool, WWI era biplanes are awesome, old knives will still cut stuff but for the day to day use it's much more about getting the job done vs. making some kind of hipster statement about knives.
And I'd have to hazard a guess most of us are posting on here with media devices less than a decade old vs. a 1960s punchcard computer.