Looks great!
Quick thoughts:
I don’t remember if it was in Kevin’s article (likely) or elsewhere, but I do remember reading a brief description of the origins of the Vildmark name and its intended use. I think it would be nice if that were added.
Also, in addition to the blade stock, OAL and blade length, I also find blade height (spine to sharpened edge at the ricasso) to be a useful measure when comparing models. (This would be especially true for models that come in guardless or “K” variants). I find it helps me get a better idea of how the knife can be used and of the taper of the blade. For example, I also have a (K) Apache, whose overall size is similar to the Vildmark and has the same blade stock but a taller blade. While I have no doubts that it would withstand hard use, if I was expecting to mostly do wood work, I would lean towards taking the Vildmark because of the more obtuse angle of the blade (a little more meat behind the edge) so that I would be less concerned about damaging the blade if I were to baton or twist it.
Finally, and with apologies to everyone else, we need to get one of these into Danny’s (
@FeralGentleman ) hands because he takes the best outdoor/in-use knife pics
