- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,898
Post vises - "A leg to stand on"
So, I drove out and met a guy about a post vice. Been wanting to find one that was usable yet not for what some of them are listed for. He ended up being a really good character and the vise ended up coming home with me. I think it was a worthwhile purchase and I'm really looking forward to setting it up either in my garage or maybe sinking a post of sorts outside. Somehow I think it's going inside because I plan to use it as much as I have time to - and my covered area outside is limited.
Thanks again for the advice on what to inspect especially Square_peg and jblyttle for putting it in laymans terms. I mentioned this thing in the It followed me home thread but I dont want to ruin that one so I just started another one.

Here is my initial take on it (using my new checklist):
The screw threads are unpitted, clean, and they look close to square.

The box doesn't seem to be damaged in any way or have any evidence of repair. The screw mates up easily on initial threading and stays tight. No real play in them until the screw is close to unthreaded. I assume that is part of the design so the jaws get enough relief close to being fully open. It does have the split style mounting brackets.
The spring is different than I've seen in pictures/old ads but honestly, I've only seen 3 in person (this makes 4) and pictures we all have access to. It could already be a leaf spring or mal-adjusted but it certainly seems pinned tight in there but the retention tenon does have a little wear on it like I would expect from removing and reinstalling tool marks. Maybe that is what they looked like when they went out dont know. The jaw readily "wants" to open upon release and it tracks the screw tightly. It is actually very, very smooth.
The donut doesn't have any functional issues but Im not sure I'm looking at the original donut. Is that what you are describing as an automotive throw-out bearing?
The foot isn't abused:
The jaws are about 4 5/8".
It is marked with a 60 as weight. It is painted black but it does have one visible makers mark.
This picture is terrible to make out the marking under the paint even with chalk. Without stripping the paint off of it I can only see more of it tilted just right in the light. It weighs 60lbs so I gave up trying to wrangle it into position.
Warren Tool & Forge Co., Quikwerk line of implements and tools.
I want any historians to feel free to chime in or correct me here but this my take on the Quikwerk, just on what I could find.
Warren Tool & Forge Co was organized in 1911 according to the following publication in 1922
Steel Processing and Conversion, Volume 8, 1922
So I assume they marked their tools with their Warren Tool & Forge stamp.
The earliest I could find on their Quikwerk line is in a railroad catalog from 1921. Picks are on the first page that mentioned Quikwerk tools but they had a variety of offerings shown.
Railway Track & Structures Cyclopedia, Issue 1
A 1922 publication has the Quikwerk line of tools including a vise like what I picked up.
Hardware World: Plumbing & Heating, Volume 17, 1922
Little Giant
1921
American Exporter: A Monthly Journal of Foreign Trade, Volume 89
P.58
Here is something Steve Tall posted in a thread about Warren Tool & Forge Co. in reference to an adze:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1303554-Hack-Devil-Adze
As far as the Quikwerk line, I don't know how long they were made or if another company bought them out/merged and the Quikwerk line continued under different manufacturing conditions.
Beyond that, the linked books and publications are pretty interesting resources and include a lot of older tools I have seen questions asked about here (hammers/sledges/adzes/etc.) from the logging and rail industry.
So, I drove out and met a guy about a post vice. Been wanting to find one that was usable yet not for what some of them are listed for. He ended up being a really good character and the vise ended up coming home with me. I think it was a worthwhile purchase and I'm really looking forward to setting it up either in my garage or maybe sinking a post of sorts outside. Somehow I think it's going inside because I plan to use it as much as I have time to - and my covered area outside is limited.
Thanks again for the advice on what to inspect especially Square_peg and jblyttle for putting it in laymans terms. I mentioned this thing in the It followed me home thread but I dont want to ruin that one so I just started another one.

Here is my initial take on it (using my new checklist):
Check the screw. The threads should have square corners - or at least nearly square, and no pitting.
The screw threads are unpitted, clean, and they look close to square.

The 'box', the part that receives the screw should be undamaged.
The box doesn't seem to be damaged in any way or have any evidence of repair. The screw mates up easily on initial threading and stays tight. No real play in them until the screw is close to unthreaded. I assume that is part of the design so the jaws get enough relief close to being fully open. It does have the split style mounting brackets.

The spring should function lively - though it's not a big deal for a blacksmith to replace a spring - prybars make decent replacements.
The spring is different than I've seen in pictures/old ads but honestly, I've only seen 3 in person (this makes 4) and pictures we all have access to. It could already be a leaf spring or mal-adjusted but it certainly seems pinned tight in there but the retention tenon does have a little wear on it like I would expect from removing and reinstalling tool marks. Maybe that is what they looked like when they went out dont know. The jaw readily "wants" to open upon release and it tracks the screw tightly. It is actually very, very smooth.

The donut is the bearing between the crank and the body of the vise. It should be smooth not pitted. A pitted donut will seize up the vise. A pitted donut can be replaced with an automotive throw-out bearing. The throw-out bearings work nice and smooth.
The donut doesn't have any functional issues but Im not sure I'm looking at the original donut. Is that what you are describing as an automotive throw-out bearing?

The foot isn't abused:

The jaws are about 4 5/8".

It is marked with a 60 as weight. It is painted black but it does have one visible makers mark.

This picture is terrible to make out the marking under the paint even with chalk. Without stripping the paint off of it I can only see more of it tilted just right in the light. It weighs 60lbs so I gave up trying to wrangle it into position.
Warren Tool & Forge Co., Quikwerk line of implements and tools.
I want any historians to feel free to chime in or correct me here but this my take on the Quikwerk, just on what I could find.
Warren Tool & Forge Co was organized in 1911 according to the following publication in 1922
Steel Processing and Conversion, Volume 8, 1922

So I assume they marked their tools with their Warren Tool & Forge stamp.
The earliest I could find on their Quikwerk line is in a railroad catalog from 1921. Picks are on the first page that mentioned Quikwerk tools but they had a variety of offerings shown.
Railway Track & Structures Cyclopedia, Issue 1

A 1922 publication has the Quikwerk line of tools including a vise like what I picked up.
Hardware World: Plumbing & Heating, Volume 17, 1922

Little Giant
1921
American Exporter: A Monthly Journal of Foreign Trade, Volume 89
P.58

Here is something Steve Tall posted in a thread about Warren Tool & Forge Co. in reference to an adze:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1303554-Hack-Devil-Adze
Two different companies, at two different cities named Warren, one in Ohio and the other in Pennsylvania.
Warren Tool & Forge started production in 1912, according to this History of Northeastern Ohio, page 1112
"George F. Konold, son of Christ Konold, entered the shops of the Iron City Tool Works, at Pittsburgh, at the age of 15 years. He became a helper, then a hammersmith, and by practical experience acquired a knowledge of every branch of the forge industry. At the time of his father's death in 1888 he was 24 years old, and well equipped and qualified to become his father's successor as superintendent of the plant. That post he filled for 23 years. It was in 1911 that Mr. Konold became identified with the industrial affairs of the city of Warren. He and his brother, M. J. Konold, and J. D. Robertson, of Pittsburgh, organized in that year the Warren Tool & Forge Company. Ground was broken in December of that year and the plant was completed and equipped with machinery of Mr. Konold's special design. The first shipment of products was made in June, 1912. George F. Konold was the practical man of the concern. He was treasurer and general manager of the company. The president was Mr. Robertson and the vice president was M. J. Konold. Both resided at Pittsburgh...
As far as the Quikwerk line, I don't know how long they were made or if another company bought them out/merged and the Quikwerk line continued under different manufacturing conditions.
Beyond that, the linked books and publications are pretty interesting resources and include a lot of older tools I have seen questions asked about here (hammers/sledges/adzes/etc.) from the logging and rail industry.
Last edited: