- Joined
- Oct 2, 1998
- Messages
- 43,568
Up front, let me say that I have many traditional knives, (wharncliffe trapper by way of example), which incorporate the wharncliffe blade, and I have an appreciation for it.
But this thread is meant to pose the following question:
Outside of the fact that you just like the profile...for utility purposes, if you didn't need to put the entire edge of your blade on the material to be cut, why would you choose this blade pattern...

...over any of the following examples?:

To my way of thinking, any of the last three are much more useful for EDC or any utility task but those requiring the full edge to be laid on the material.
So, unless you want a $400 box cutter, just prefer the blade pattern, or find it useful for self defense, why would you choose the straight edge wharncliffe?
(There is no right or wrong answer, just your well considered opinion is sufficient.)
But this thread is meant to pose the following question:
Outside of the fact that you just like the profile...for utility purposes, if you didn't need to put the entire edge of your blade on the material to be cut, why would you choose this blade pattern...

...over any of the following examples?:



To my way of thinking, any of the last three are much more useful for EDC or any utility task but those requiring the full edge to be laid on the material.
So, unless you want a $400 box cutter, just prefer the blade pattern, or find it useful for self defense, why would you choose the straight edge wharncliffe?
(There is no right or wrong answer, just your well considered opinion is sufficient.)