Yes it is. I have a 500 and compared it the other day to a 112 because I love the looks and feel of the 112. The 112 is definitely thicker! For me the 112 is a belt sheath knife. It is too heavy for pocket carry, at least for me it is. I am sure there will be others that feel differently.Is the 500 handle slimmer than that of a 112? I haven't yet embraced belt carry (my fixed blade is there); and the 112 is larger than I like to have sitting in the bottom of my pocket.
Today feels like a 501 day, to me
(I'll add the pic later - I'm going back to bed for a while)
Thank you!Yes it is. I have a 500 and compared it the other day to a 112 because I love the looks and feel of the 112. The 112 is definitely thicker! For me the 112 is a belt sheath knife. It is too heavy for pocket carry, at least for me it is. I am sure there will be others that feel differently.
I'm going with a 500 today. I got one a while ago because I love the 501, but never connected with the 500. The ratios seem off to me. I always thought the blade was a little too small for the handle and wasn't proportionate. There's a whole lotta bolster as well. But, I grabbed it this morning and we'll see how it goes....
I have two 112 Slims and I recommend them highly. I also like the grip of the thicker handle on the classic 112 and there's just something about natural handle materials with bolsters that appeals to me. Aluminum, brass, micarta, I haven't met a 112 that I don't like. I'll take one of each, please.I read somewhere the 112 aluminum is in the making. you have seen the 112 slims, I presume.
Ya, the 500 is just a snubbed up 110 and slimmed.
I like the front bolster on the 112 but the 500 being slimmer pocket carries much better.