HH -
To be clear, I am NOT calling you out, and I don't know if I agree or not with your statement.
Is your argument that a beginner may trash a good knife and waste money? If so, do you have any other arguments in your back pocket?
I'm asking because it would seem that Murray Carter disagrees. He states "
I have always believed that a beginner should practice with a high quality knife because only a blade of good metallurgy (hard blade) will produce the kind of results the sharpening student is looking for. If the goal is to achieve a “scary sharp” edge, the student must sharpen a blade capable of producing one, and softer blades are not capable of that. The misunderstanding is that a good quality knife will be ruined from amateur sharpening practice, but such is never the case. As students gain an understanding and mastery over sharpening, they will be able to refurbish the same knife at will."
On at least a surface reading of Carter's statement - this version is from KnifePlanet.Com, 11/25/2015 - he maintains a position opposed to yours. That is, he would seem to hold that a student of sharpening should practice only on premium knives.
Logically, and by this I mean following the rules of logic in writing, both of you are making a claim for which the only evidence offered is your respective authorities. So - again, logically - we would have to determine a winner by examining each person's accomplishments as a bladesmith / sharpener.
I am not sure that I agree with Carter, based on my own experience. I'm also not sure that I, personally, have the knowledge to refute his argument, and I hope that you do in fact have an additional unstatd argument which will in fact refute his position.
Thank you for any help you can provide.
---RLDubbya
http://helltownknives.com
Sharper than hell, with good reason.