Searching for a Great Eastern Cutlery #35 Churchill, I thought it would be a long time before I found a Tidioute version on the secondary market. I did find, languishing on a dealer’s shelf a new Tidioute #66 Calf Roper in ebony, so I grabbed it while the grabbing was good. Of course, I found a Tidioute Churchill the next day. Being now wiser in the ways of Great Eastern Cutlery knives, I bought it too.
To my mind, these are two outstanding examples of traditional user knives, which is why I wanted them originally. And they are. The surprise was that the smaller, wider Calf Roper is my favorite of the the two. I had expected the Churchill would be my go-to carry knife of the two. This shows once again that a knife can’t be realistically evaluated in terms of how it will or will not suit you until you get one in hand and use it for a while.
From photos and online speculation, I was convinced that the closed blade configuration of the 66 would be both wonky and somewhat uncomfortable when one blade was open for use, but not so. I suppose it is the size of the handle, the slight serpentine bend and the positioning of the closed blades relative the the open one that make it just fine. All of this is of course due to Bill Howard’s uncanny design expertise.
The Churchill is a fine knife, and I really like it, don’t get me wrong. It will have its share of pocket and use time for sure. It is just bigger in almost every way (sheep foot excepted, probably) than the Calf Roper. Not much bigger but the difference is noticeable, not something I expected. Even so, to my feel, they both weigh so much the same that weight isn’t a factor.
Most of my other Great Eastern Cutlery knives don’t see much use so I plan to move them along and stick with my one “collector” piece, and three or so users.
I would recommend both the 66 and the 35 to anyone looking for an excellent traditional user pocket knife. I know I’m happy.
Off to church with both.