- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 345
I've been looking for a big chopper for awhile now, I bought an RTAK II to start off but the handle left a lot to be desired. It chopped down 3" to 4" soft and hard wood trees easy enough. It did great on branches too. The handle just isn't very good, it's pretty close to terrible. The edge did dull a little but didn't chip or roll so the performance of the steel was good for my purposes. So I've decided to get another chopper, this time with input from the folks here. All of them seem to have very good warranties, so while that plays a part they all seem to get a passable grade in that area.
Here is what I'm looking at and the reasoning behind the choice in no particular order-
Ontario Bushcraft Woodsman 9.18- This is the least costly of the bunch and it uses the same steel as my RTAK II. It's thicker I think but I can't find an exact number, my best guess is 1/4". The handle looks much better and more ergonomic. It looks more broom handle shaped compared to the RTAK II's brick shaped handle. It's not out yet, so I have to base this on looks and previous experience with Ontario. The only down is no coating on a carbon steel blade, which might be problematic in the humidity of Ohio. They say that the sheath will be by Desantis so it might turn out ok, the sheath from my RTAK II is usable but not great. If I get it I'll be out less than $100 so I wouldn't be out much.
TOPS Armageddon- It gets good reviews and I haven't seen someone actually break or damage one. TOPS isn't big here but they seem to have a good rep among those here that have them. Overall fit and finish looks good, better than Ontario but you will pay twice the price. It was recommended in another thread and I can see why, it's just a tough piece of 1/4" thick 1095 steel. The blade coating looks to be pretty decent. The only thing I'm unsure of is the handle scales, they seem sort of brickish like the RTAK II. The sheath is also like my RTAK II's, usable but not great. I can get it for around $200, that makes it middle of the pack between the 5 I'm looking at.
ESEE Junglas- This is a constant recommendation, probably because it just works. It is thinner than all the others though, listed at .18". It seems pretty durable though despite how thin it is. My concern is that it might not have enough weight behind the edge, I like my knives to be a little blade heavy. I find I don't have to work as hard. The coating on the blade looks to be durable enough. It's 2nd lowest when it comes to price at around $160. It might very well be the best bang for the buck. The handle looks more roundish so it might be okay, I just want to be sure. Even if I didn't like it everyone says it will sell on the exchange and I can get most of my money back. It's also 1095, which works fine for me and ESEE has a great heat treat by all accounts. It may also come with the best sheath of the bunch.
Entrek Bison- This came out of the blue while researching large blades. The blade length is the shortest of the five but not too short for me. It comes in at 9" long and 1/4" thick. It's also the only stainless blade of the bunch using 440C. The climate in Ohio kind of sucks and humidity and moisture are a major concern. 440C could be the best choice for the climate. The handle looks very comfortable, and I've yet to find a complaint on the ergos. It's probably the lightest though, so I'm not sure how good it will be at chopping. It's also second highest in cost at $220, but not obscene when compared to the other 5. The sheath looks to be kydex so it might be good to go. I've not found many unkind words about Entrek and they're like TOPS here, those who have them seem to like them a lot.
Scrap Yard 911- This might be considered the toughest of the 5 but by how much I can't be sure. It's a 9.5" long 1/4" thick piece of manliness, I'm paraphrasing of course but that's the picture that was painted for me. It was another recommendation. The Res C handle is said to be very comfy and helps mitigate some of the shock out of blows but it does seem thick. The blade coating looks to be as durable as the others. It's also made in my home state so that's a plus. It will end up being the most expensive though as I will need a sheath to go with it. It'll end up between $240 to $260, still not too much but it's the highest. How much better is the steel than the others as far as oxidation, edge retention, and ease of sharpening? Oxidation and edge retention are secondary concerns really. My 5160 RTAK II took what I had to throw at it like a champ and stayed reasonably sharp and all of the above are considered to have comparable or better steel. I'm OCD about cleaning and oiling anything steel so rust won't be a big problem. Having to spend an extra 30 minutes on my sharpmaker would really be a downer though. All the others listed seem to be easier/quicker to sharpen but I've never had SR101 so it's unknown to me how much it really differs.
Besides some heat treat problems from Ontario, the above blades and the steel they use seems to be pretty solid. Ontario may have corrected the heat treat problems currently, most failures (videos and written reviews) I found are years and not months old. If I have missed a blade that is in this size and cost range then please include it in a post with how it has performed for you.
I'd most like to hear from those that have 1 or more of these knives. Comparison pics (hell, any pics) would be wonderful, as specially if the are side by sides of the handles on the spine, front, and sides. Most seem to forget how important they are, if it wasn't for the handle on the RTAK II I wouldn't be looking for a different chopper. I wear medium to large gloves as brands always differ. If you have hands in the same size range and have tried any of these blades please let me know how the handles felt.
Sorry for the long post but I wanted to be thorough. As always I'd like to thank everyone in advance for the all help!
Here is what I'm looking at and the reasoning behind the choice in no particular order-
Ontario Bushcraft Woodsman 9.18- This is the least costly of the bunch and it uses the same steel as my RTAK II. It's thicker I think but I can't find an exact number, my best guess is 1/4". The handle looks much better and more ergonomic. It looks more broom handle shaped compared to the RTAK II's brick shaped handle. It's not out yet, so I have to base this on looks and previous experience with Ontario. The only down is no coating on a carbon steel blade, which might be problematic in the humidity of Ohio. They say that the sheath will be by Desantis so it might turn out ok, the sheath from my RTAK II is usable but not great. If I get it I'll be out less than $100 so I wouldn't be out much.
TOPS Armageddon- It gets good reviews and I haven't seen someone actually break or damage one. TOPS isn't big here but they seem to have a good rep among those here that have them. Overall fit and finish looks good, better than Ontario but you will pay twice the price. It was recommended in another thread and I can see why, it's just a tough piece of 1/4" thick 1095 steel. The blade coating looks to be pretty decent. The only thing I'm unsure of is the handle scales, they seem sort of brickish like the RTAK II. The sheath is also like my RTAK II's, usable but not great. I can get it for around $200, that makes it middle of the pack between the 5 I'm looking at.
ESEE Junglas- This is a constant recommendation, probably because it just works. It is thinner than all the others though, listed at .18". It seems pretty durable though despite how thin it is. My concern is that it might not have enough weight behind the edge, I like my knives to be a little blade heavy. I find I don't have to work as hard. The coating on the blade looks to be durable enough. It's 2nd lowest when it comes to price at around $160. It might very well be the best bang for the buck. The handle looks more roundish so it might be okay, I just want to be sure. Even if I didn't like it everyone says it will sell on the exchange and I can get most of my money back. It's also 1095, which works fine for me and ESEE has a great heat treat by all accounts. It may also come with the best sheath of the bunch.
Entrek Bison- This came out of the blue while researching large blades. The blade length is the shortest of the five but not too short for me. It comes in at 9" long and 1/4" thick. It's also the only stainless blade of the bunch using 440C. The climate in Ohio kind of sucks and humidity and moisture are a major concern. 440C could be the best choice for the climate. The handle looks very comfortable, and I've yet to find a complaint on the ergos. It's probably the lightest though, so I'm not sure how good it will be at chopping. It's also second highest in cost at $220, but not obscene when compared to the other 5. The sheath looks to be kydex so it might be good to go. I've not found many unkind words about Entrek and they're like TOPS here, those who have them seem to like them a lot.
Scrap Yard 911- This might be considered the toughest of the 5 but by how much I can't be sure. It's a 9.5" long 1/4" thick piece of manliness, I'm paraphrasing of course but that's the picture that was painted for me. It was another recommendation. The Res C handle is said to be very comfy and helps mitigate some of the shock out of blows but it does seem thick. The blade coating looks to be as durable as the others. It's also made in my home state so that's a plus. It will end up being the most expensive though as I will need a sheath to go with it. It'll end up between $240 to $260, still not too much but it's the highest. How much better is the steel than the others as far as oxidation, edge retention, and ease of sharpening? Oxidation and edge retention are secondary concerns really. My 5160 RTAK II took what I had to throw at it like a champ and stayed reasonably sharp and all of the above are considered to have comparable or better steel. I'm OCD about cleaning and oiling anything steel so rust won't be a big problem. Having to spend an extra 30 minutes on my sharpmaker would really be a downer though. All the others listed seem to be easier/quicker to sharpen but I've never had SR101 so it's unknown to me how much it really differs.
Besides some heat treat problems from Ontario, the above blades and the steel they use seems to be pretty solid. Ontario may have corrected the heat treat problems currently, most failures (videos and written reviews) I found are years and not months old. If I have missed a blade that is in this size and cost range then please include it in a post with how it has performed for you.
I'd most like to hear from those that have 1 or more of these knives. Comparison pics (hell, any pics) would be wonderful, as specially if the are side by sides of the handles on the spine, front, and sides. Most seem to forget how important they are, if it wasn't for the handle on the RTAK II I wouldn't be looking for a different chopper. I wear medium to large gloves as brands always differ. If you have hands in the same size range and have tried any of these blades please let me know how the handles felt.
Sorry for the long post but I wanted to be thorough. As always I'd like to thank everyone in advance for the all help!