Pretty much what sunshadow said. If I were making an indestructable, or as close as I can get, hard use combat type knife I'd use a hidden tang with mycarta and a steel pommel screwed down tight. Most of my hidden tang knives don't have a pommel and are good for any thing except maybe hamming the pommel.
Here's a pic of an earlier knife that I destroyed. Basically I bent it 90 degrees, then straightened, then bent again until it broke. Then I re clamped it and bent and worked it till it broke again. Then one more time till I ran out of blade. The handle joint showed no deformation what so ever. Every time I've tried that with a full tang the handle failed first. Even with mycarta and Loveless bolts the handle showed damage.
Now were talking about differentially heat treated carbon steel, not stainless. Normally on stainless I do a full tang, on carbon steel I do a hidden tang, generally but not always. My thinking is that with stainless the blade is subject to fail before a well constructed handle of either construction.
One other thing is that a hidden tang has less opportunity for moister to enter the joints over time.
Nothing wrong with either construction method, just be aware of the limitations. I recently bent a hidden tang knife and the stabilized wood failed about the time the blade went to 90 degrees, it didn't come off, just cracked good and proper.
Edited to add, Mark's got a good point about movement in the handle material, it'll really show up on a full tang. One other thing too, if I put a pommel on a natural material that likes to move much, I make it a floating pommel. Meaning that it's not screwed to the tang, but has a tang of it's on, that way the handle can shrink and expand without developing cracks from compression. Learned that the hard way with some elk sheds.