Buck doesn't make lower cost/quality copies of its own knives to hit any price point in any market. I gave the 110 as an example because it is available at a lower cost at Wal-Mart than at other retailers and people commonly believe it is a lower cost/quality version of that model. It is not because, once again, Buck doesn't make lower cost and lower quality copies of any of their knives for any market.
Your China made canoe knife is the only canoe knife Buck sells. It is not a lower cost copy of a higher quality canoe knife intended to be sold specifically at Wal-Mart. It is part of a line of knives intended to be low cost to be sold at any number of retailers. Wal-Mart did not demand that Buck produce a low cost Chinese made canoe knife; Buck decided that a low cost Chinese made canoe knife would be profitable on retail shelves and Wal-Mart sells them.
I did wonder about that as well when I saw the same Buck 110's going for $50-$70 elsewhere that I bought at Walmart for $35. But then I decided that if what I had WAS some "inferior copy", it was plenty good enough for me. Very sharp, well put together. 420HC is plenty good enough for my purposes. The blade snaps open like a bank vault locking, ad real sound mechanical "SNAP", and a totally firm lockup. What's interesting is that my Walmart 110 came with a good leather sheath, where others have claimed all Walmart 110s come with nylon. Perhaps that's just that ugly plastic-handled version? It also came in a normal yellow cardboard Buck box; I don't know what their really expensive knives come in, but it's the same box a $100 Buck 119 Special comes in. So as far as the 110 goes, I don't know where they make their profit, other than by selling a huge volume, or even by using it as a price leader (selling it at cost or even a loss as a way to lure customers into the store). Interestingly I couldn't find a Buck 112 for less than $55, IIRC, and $70 seems to me the more normal price. Partly the low cost of 110s at Walmart (and in general) might just be because it is harder to find people willing to carry one. The 112 is just a much more convenient size and weight for most people.
I asked about the Schrade in particular though because when I look at the versions under glass, they DO seem to be of better quality (although still cheap), at least in handle material. The other two knives in the pack were sold as an "Old Timer Stockman" and a regular Old Timer 2-blade slipjoint penknife. I looked at them and thought "this cannot possibly the normal build quality of these knives!" Thin, flimsy blades that bear visible machining marks, machining marks all around the stacked brass of the frame, rough pins, hard plastic handles, and the blades are actually BENT to make them all fit together. Maybe that's normal, but it seems really cheap to me. Although to be honest I bought a tiny little Buck penknife instead....and although the blades are nice and shiny and straight, they are also looser and more flimsy than the Old Timer. So for now the OT penknife is the one that I carry every day, now that I stopped carrying my grandfathers old Boker penknife since I was afraid I'd loose it eventually (which is incidentally a superb knife of excellent build and metallurgy; maybe I was just spoiled and expecting too much).
Oh, and Kershaws. I ended up with a 4-pack of Kershaw Walmart knives, and they were better than I expected. The biggest was a spring-loaded blade, they are all four very sharp and aren't noticeably worse in quality than a typical entry-level Kershaw. One 3.5in spring-loaded blade, semi sheesfoot/drop-point blade(?) with flipper and a 2.5" drop point stonewash with a long, slender blade and handle, also a flipper, no spring. And two utility frame-locks with 2 or 1.5" clip-point blades and nail-nicks. All for $25; not top-tier at all, but I have no complaints about build quality at any rate. But I'm no steel connoisseur either; I've carried $30 knives for years without noticing any particular difference between them and the $70 knives I've had at other times. Anyway, Kershaw and Buck both seem to manage to make knives "at Walmart's price point" without suffering unduly, but the three Schrades I've got so far have been pretty terrible in terms of general construction (but functional enough), and I'd hate to think they were all that bad.
I know it's not something that people like to hear, but the Chinese are perfectly capable of building high-quality items; you just don't see them very often because that's not what companies go to China for. US companies go there looking for the cheapest product they can get, and if they specify a POS, they'll get a POS. If they don't want to invest in quality tooling and materials, the Chinese labor will build them the crap they want, because that will sell. Remember, most of the cheap "Made in China" crap you see is actually sold by American companies...or it was until they were bought out. If you give the Chinese the money for a nice factory, or you are willing to pay them high enough price per unit, they can make stuff as well as any typical American factory. Mostly this involves running machines anyway, so it's not like there is some inherent American craftsmanship missing here. An American worker loads raw materials into a machine pretty much like a Chinese or Taiwanese worker.
But if you ARE willing to spend more on your product, then many companies decide they might as well go all the way and just stay in the US for the added sales incentive the "Made in the US" label gives. It's a form of investment. But there are also plenty of those who invest in decent tooling and materials in China and import merch that is perfectly fine in quality, just lacking the "Made in US" cachet people like.
This is all terribly unfortunate and I certainly wish the manufacturers would just stay home, but it's the free market, and they can build the same quality for cheaper. I don't blame them, and it doesn't ever pay to underestimate China. We will have trouble with them long before we do with Russia!