mykel m
Gold Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 12,132
Sooo....
I went out on Easter day and compared my Fiskars, Corona and Silky folding saws and thought I'd share my experience with the three.
All three are pull cutters and have approximately 10" blades, with the Fiskars and Coronna having curved blades.
I cut the Fiskars handle down a bit because it was too high for a comfortable grip IMO so that's why it looks like it do BTW.
I'll just go ahead and say the Silky outperformed the other two by a good bit.
It took only 27 pulls to go through the branch with the Gomboy 270 with med. teeth and it took 40 some for the Fiskars and 30 some for the Corona with coarse teeth each.
And just to make sure I counted right I did it again with the same results plus or minus a few pulls for each.
The Silky Gomboy is a supper smooth cutter and really impressed me with its performance.
And it folds down to a more compact package for you back packers.
Well worth the extra cost IMO.(about double the Corona)
Then....
after farting around camp a bit I decided to see how the Silky handled big wood and found this blowdown and commenced to sawing away.
I didn't count the pulls but it went silky smooth with nary a sweat broke going through the log/future firewood.
Heck of a saw!
Then yesterday I went out to shoot my new LCR and took the Buck Saw I made to check it out against the Silky.
And again the Silky kicked butt!
It took 56 pulls for the Buck Saw vs 32 for the Silky going through the smaller end of the log I had cut on Easter.
But wait... I then realized the Buck saw cuts on both strokes so that means the BS took 112 strokes to the Silky's 32 and the Silky is half the length and still outperformed the Buck Saw!
Heck of a saw that Silky Gomboy 270 with medium teeth!
I've read many a post/review touting the superiority of the Silky brand saws and now see for myself that the reviewers weren't blowing smoke up my skirt.
Well worth the extra cost IMO.
If anyone wants a free Fiskars or Corona let me know, I'll ship it out at no cost to you.
I went out on Easter day and compared my Fiskars, Corona and Silky folding saws and thought I'd share my experience with the three.
All three are pull cutters and have approximately 10" blades, with the Fiskars and Coronna having curved blades.
I cut the Fiskars handle down a bit because it was too high for a comfortable grip IMO so that's why it looks like it do BTW.
I'll just go ahead and say the Silky outperformed the other two by a good bit.
It took only 27 pulls to go through the branch with the Gomboy 270 with med. teeth and it took 40 some for the Fiskars and 30 some for the Corona with coarse teeth each.
And just to make sure I counted right I did it again with the same results plus or minus a few pulls for each.
The Silky Gomboy is a supper smooth cutter and really impressed me with its performance.
And it folds down to a more compact package for you back packers.
Well worth the extra cost IMO.(about double the Corona)
Then....
after farting around camp a bit I decided to see how the Silky handled big wood and found this blowdown and commenced to sawing away.
I didn't count the pulls but it went silky smooth with nary a sweat broke going through the log/future firewood.
Heck of a saw!
Then yesterday I went out to shoot my new LCR and took the Buck Saw I made to check it out against the Silky.
And again the Silky kicked butt!
It took 56 pulls for the Buck Saw vs 32 for the Silky going through the smaller end of the log I had cut on Easter.
But wait... I then realized the Buck saw cuts on both strokes so that means the BS took 112 strokes to the Silky's 32 and the Silky is half the length and still outperformed the Buck Saw!
Heck of a saw that Silky Gomboy 270 with medium teeth!
I've read many a post/review touting the superiority of the Silky brand saws and now see for myself that the reviewers weren't blowing smoke up my skirt.
Well worth the extra cost IMO.
If anyone wants a free Fiskars or Corona let me know, I'll ship it out at no cost to you.