Its finally here, 17.5" WWII model. It has a bone handle and the blade is about 11 7/8", the weight is 689.4 g. Certainly a well made knife.
I found the knife to be on the dull side but totally adequate for chopping. In my eagerness to test it I did not burnish the edge to razer sharpness.
I sectioned a 2x4 into 5 pcs (chopped through 4x). The performance was extremely consistant 10 chops for each sectioning. Not surprisingly, a razor sharp edge is not required for chopping.
While I have not tried real trees I believe this is now my second best chopper. The first best is the 20" Ang Khola and third the 15" Ang Khola.
I discovered putting extra energy into the 17.5" WWII model improved performance. I could not get the 20" Ang Khola to go faster no matter how much effort I put into it.
The blade thickness profile is very similar to my 16.5" WWII model yet it is considerably heavier. What is the density difference between bone and wood?
Tough decision time is this a new favorite for me (16.5" WWII model current).
Will
I found the knife to be on the dull side but totally adequate for chopping. In my eagerness to test it I did not burnish the edge to razer sharpness.
I sectioned a 2x4 into 5 pcs (chopped through 4x). The performance was extremely consistant 10 chops for each sectioning. Not surprisingly, a razor sharp edge is not required for chopping.
While I have not tried real trees I believe this is now my second best chopper. The first best is the 20" Ang Khola and third the 15" Ang Khola.
I discovered putting extra energy into the 17.5" WWII model improved performance. I could not get the 20" Ang Khola to go faster no matter how much effort I put into it.
The blade thickness profile is very similar to my 16.5" WWII model yet it is considerably heavier. What is the density difference between bone and wood?
Tough decision time is this a new favorite for me (16.5" WWII model current).
Will