As always, the information is very welcome. A good deal of the hobby is hearing the various stories and anecdotes about the knives. That's why I always tend towards traditionals -- they have better stories.
This is absolutely true. I actually missed out on a Ranger stockman the other day because I got too busy to hound eBay, and I normally try to "read" the bids on those auctions to measure the risk. I was a little upset when I returned to my watch list to find out the knife had gone for under what I would have paid for it, but that's how it goes!
Nice work refurbishing that Ranger, Mauser. Those carbon blade sure do cut above their price tags. If you're interested in Camillus as well, take a look at
my comparison post over in the Barlow thread. Camillus is another brand I enjoy collecting, though even their later models occasionally fetch prices I'll bet their staff wishes they could have commanded before they had to auction everything off in 2007. I have a few knives from that auction including a Classic Cartridge bone moose knife and a composite TL-29 with an unfinished (rough, not dull) edge grind on the screwdriver blade.
I found out just this evening that I've had another Colonial hiding "in plain sight" in my knife collection this whole time. Here it is, a 4" single-blade linerlock serpentine jack:
Now you might be thinking to yourself "Self, that's a Lakota, not a Colonial!" Yeah, that's what I thought too. Then I spotted this knife up on the big auction site:
Same liner lock pattern, similar NRA membership etch on the handle. But it's stamped "Colonial"! I guess that must mean Lakota was either a Colonial imprint or a contract knife (and it's entirely possible that, like Camillus, they were scraping to build knives towards the bitter end and grabbed any blades they had on hand to finish their orders).
So I used my "missed Ranger" money and snapped it up for the matched set.