Joe (and everyone else who knows about this) - edge/blade geometry question (I think about this stuff a lot lately, I am finishing the final shaping and polishing of a 31" pweld jian in the style of the Ming Dynasty - no pics, customer doesn't want anyone else to ever make a sword like his - sorry).
You were comparing the relative ease of cutting targets, and mentioned rolled up newspaper versus thicker paper versus tatami. I have the blade fully convexed, which is a bitch with a double-edged blade, and results in a lenticular form with a very small ridge for low drag. I have the edge rolled in relatively thick, for support and to mimic a blade that could encounter something akin to what the Europeans would have called a brigandine.
I don't know if you are comfortable sharing these sorts of stats, but if you are, how thick is the blade on that, at the optimal cutting spot, about 1/16", 1/8", and 1/4" back from the edge?
I am trying to decide whether to take just a bit off of the meat of the convexity that rolls down to the final edge on this jian. I rolled the edges in with a slack belt and then have dressed and set the shape some more with files, and I am just about where I want to be. I would like to know how what I have made/am making compares to the one you have. If that is ok? If you don't want it public, maybe a pm?
The one I am working on, as it sits now (and I may take a tad off of the niku - thus the point of the email) is:
1/16" from edge = .05" thick,
1/8" from edge = .09" thick
1/4" from edge = .12" thick.
ridge (about .4" from edge) = .135"
Steel for the core of the blade is 1084 and 15n20, 17 layers, twisted. The edge bars are W2 and 1075, which will give a look like the old piled construction, with enough carbon and vanadium to hold an edge well and keep the grain fine.
It is tempered to RC 54-55
As you can visualize, the ridge is low, and there isn't the easy to make but not ideal long flat grind to a convexed edge. The whole thing is rolled, but I am just trying to decide how much more meat to take out of the roll.
Your blade seems great, and I thought that some comparison info may help me make up my mind. I am not going to copy what you have, as the general shapes are so different, anyway. This is just what has been on my mind because I am doing that work that is the transition between shaping and polishing (working with smooth files and then 220 grit paper). After 220, it becomes just polishing.
edited to add: I find a ridge quite challenging when it is in a blade with this geometry because it is low and there isn't a wide flat coming in to the ridge. This less pronounced ridge is just plain harder to make. I can see why, just from a technical standpoint, fullers were so often used. The edge geometry on what I have right now is almost identical to what one would see on a Viking or Migration era sword, but Migration era may have been a tad thicker, and they were making their blades to face light armor (hauberks). Jians were for a mixture of light armor and no armor (sort of like waks).
decisions, decisions...
great thread.
thanks,
kc