I carried a 5.5" Tusker throughout my deployment to Afghanistan. A-2 steel. Served me very well. Still have and love that knife. It's now sort of a safe queen, which is, I suppose, a shame. Gossman's are made to be used.
Scott is one of the very few makers who puts a big working handle on a knife. I'll caveat that claim by saying that I do have some big XL hands. If you have small hands, I suppose the handle could seem big. The Tusker is a heavily built knife, and as a result isn't light weight. I don't think you'll find any ultralight hikers carrying a Tusker. My confidence in the Tusker made it worth carrying the slight extra weight.
I've owned a couple of Randall knives and they were fine knives, but I think Scott's knives are better designed and built. Randall does some fancier finishing and uses more dramatic design lines, which is nice. And Scott's may seem more simple in comparison. The difference will become apparent once you use them though. I like his edge geometry, a convex edge on a flat grind, and haven't had any trouble sharpening them. However, they need to be hand sharpened. Tools like Edgepro or Lansky aren't as conducive to sharpening Scott's grind. (Although I suppose you can grind and sharpen it however you want.)
I have two small Busse knives. I think they are highly overrated. I'm not even sure where they are....'cuz I never use them. I have a couple small Gossman knives as well. I carry and use them all the time, because they work well.
If you've traded a Randall or Busse for a Gossman, you've done well. You won't catch me trading one of my Gossman knives for anything.