The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I know In the military we considered it junk, even in the 90's in wet conditions it needs sharpening like every time you pull it out. I guess it's serviceable, enough, for like machetes, and axe heads every piece I test is like 52hrc a few have been at 54 hrc, but thats softer than even 440 A,, maybe all my Ka-bars, Esees, Tops and GEC are just bad batches, but out of over 60 knives, I agree better is subjective, but even Victorinox gets their steel to 56 HRC they claim 58, but I've never tested one that was that high, buck is pretty consistent at 58 HRC, and the steel they use is about 2/3 the price of 1095, I like the patina a 1095 knife gets, but that usually mean I gota sharpen it 6 times a day on the ranch, are there any steels that patina that way, that are harder?Better is subjective.
1095 has been around for a long time, because it works.
I don't have any real complaints I don't guess other than the constant sharpening, I'm just wondering, I guess it really is just traditional, I can dig that, I have some really old like wwii knives that are great,(Not sure if they are 1095 ) but newer knives I keep getting in 1095 just seem sub par, for working knives, I still love GEC, and Case Knives for my collection though,Bingo to the guys above. Old, proven, well known, and affordable. There are far worse steels that could be used, so no complaints from me about 1095.
52100I know In the military we considered it junk, even in the 90's in wet conditions it needs sharpening like every time you pull it out. I guess it's serviceable, enough, for like machetes, and axe heads every piece I test is like 52hrc a few have been at 54 hrc, but thats softer than even 440 A,, maybe all my Ka-bars, Esees, Tops and GEC are just bad batches, but out of over 60 knives, I agree better is subjective, but even Victorinox gets their steel to 56 HRC they claim 58, but I've never tested one that was that high, buck is pretty consistent at 58 HRC, and the steel they use is about 2/3 the price of 1095, I like the patina a 1095 knife gets, but that usually mean I gota sharpen it 6 times a day on the ranch, are there any steels that patina that way, that are harder?
....are there any steels that patina that way, that are harder?
Out of curiosity, what carbon steel could be considered a “step up” from 1095 without drastically increasing production costs?
You make statements as if they were fact. They are just your opinions, and I disagree with them.
Quality 1095 with good heat treat blows away mediocre super-steel with questionable heat treat, any day.
I love 1095, and have many examples that perform just as well as any wonder-steel flavor of the week for my purposes and cutting requirements.
Better is subjective.
1095 has been around for a long time, because it works.
Yup.It's cheap, it's a known quantity, and it has a great reputation. Look how popular Esee and ka-bar bk series knives are. 1095 has a history of being a great hard use steel. Companies don't need to spend money on marketing expensive steel if the public loves the cheap stuff.
Yup on both counts here.Tried and true.
I love my BK62.
Yup."Good enough is the enemy of better"
1095 gets the job done, is economical, and has a long service history that people trust. And it's pretty difficult to screw up.
1095 CoVan is definately the sweet spot for me; rugged, durable and easier to sharpen than Super-Steels that cost much more.KaBar / Becker says they run their 1095 CroVan at ~57. I've never tested it, but have no reason to doubt it. You have access to a Rockwell Tester?
I think Cold Steel runs their SK5 (~1084) blades at 58-59.
Yup.Good old 1095 has been very very good to me. I find it to be reliable, predictable, and easy to maintain.