- Joined
- Aug 24, 1999
- Messages
- 933
Just read Wizard's First Rule by Terry Goodkind, at the suggestion of a friend. I have to say...
I'm disappointed.
I'm not sure what it is, lately, but in the last few years, I'm finding a lot of authors seem to do great build-ups in the first half of the story, but then it's like either they run out of steam about two-thirds of the way through, they hand off the book to an intern to finish up for them, or they hit the crack-pipe with especial ferocity. Michael Crichton was another one of these...of the books of his that I read (Jurassic Park and Timeline, I was extremely pleased with the initial chapters, wherein he would explain the central technology at the core of the book. Crichton made the science behind the story very accessible to the layman, as well as keeping it grounded enough that you would look at it and say, "Huh...that could work, I guess." Then he'd build up a great story--very rich, very intricate. Then, it was like he got tired of telling the story, and would just sort of throw at dart at his Deus ex Machina board, and wrap it all up in a chapter or two.
Goodkind did the same damned thing!! Four hundred pages of painting a story into a corner, then he seems to have looked down, noticed what he was doing, grumbled, "Well, dang!" and decided to just knock out a straight line to the nearest conclusion he could muster.
The other thing that drove me crazy throughout the book was how he would spend fifty pages and multiple scenes describing the infallibility or inescapability of some magical power or scenario, and then turn around and casually pop off a paragraph somewhere, essentially saying, "...Oh, except in this instance." It's like building a house of cards, so that after thirty or forty courses, you can say, "Ah, I changed my mind," and blow it down in a second.
And, finally, just for the "knife/blade" content...just how many times CAN you have a character block dragon's/wizards fire with a sword, and NOT have it lose its temper?!? I want to know just what the heck they forged that sucker with--a warp core? I know, I know..."It's fantasy." "It's just a book." "You're letting the details ruin that book." "Are you going to complain about that ALL night, or are you going shut up and let me sleep before I pop you one in the pie-hole?"
GAH!!! I'm going back to technical treatises and scientific texts. Maybe the occasional Penthouse Letters column...
I'm disappointed.
I'm not sure what it is, lately, but in the last few years, I'm finding a lot of authors seem to do great build-ups in the first half of the story, but then it's like either they run out of steam about two-thirds of the way through, they hand off the book to an intern to finish up for them, or they hit the crack-pipe with especial ferocity. Michael Crichton was another one of these...of the books of his that I read (Jurassic Park and Timeline, I was extremely pleased with the initial chapters, wherein he would explain the central technology at the core of the book. Crichton made the science behind the story very accessible to the layman, as well as keeping it grounded enough that you would look at it and say, "Huh...that could work, I guess." Then he'd build up a great story--very rich, very intricate. Then, it was like he got tired of telling the story, and would just sort of throw at dart at his Deus ex Machina board, and wrap it all up in a chapter or two.
Goodkind did the same damned thing!! Four hundred pages of painting a story into a corner, then he seems to have looked down, noticed what he was doing, grumbled, "Well, dang!" and decided to just knock out a straight line to the nearest conclusion he could muster.
The other thing that drove me crazy throughout the book was how he would spend fifty pages and multiple scenes describing the infallibility or inescapability of some magical power or scenario, and then turn around and casually pop off a paragraph somewhere, essentially saying, "...Oh, except in this instance." It's like building a house of cards, so that after thirty or forty courses, you can say, "Ah, I changed my mind," and blow it down in a second.
And, finally, just for the "knife/blade" content...just how many times CAN you have a character block dragon's/wizards fire with a sword, and NOT have it lose its temper?!? I want to know just what the heck they forged that sucker with--a warp core? I know, I know..."It's fantasy." "It's just a book." "You're letting the details ruin that book." "Are you going to complain about that ALL night, or are you going shut up and let me sleep before I pop you one in the pie-hole?"
GAH!!! I'm going back to technical treatises and scientific texts. Maybe the occasional Penthouse Letters column...
Last edited: