In the wake of the new rules eliminating "net to me" sales and clarifying that posts be clear about pricing I'm still seeing some posts stating F&F pricing and G&S pricing on sales. Is this just a few bad apples not knowing the rule, or will this stay an acceptable practice?
It seems like while it eliminates the verbiage of "net to me" it is still keeping the implication of encouraging a friends and family deal just as the "net to me" statement was doing prior... Just taking the math out of it for the buyer.
I searched the rules and didn't see it strictly forbidden to post this way even though I thought I had explicitly read that sales posts be listed to include shipping and fees in the price.
I know the topic has been beaten to death and big strides were made with the rule change. I'm just curious about the clarity since there are still posts sliding through. It could very well be just the volume vs the small number of unpaid mods and admins too, in which case I'm not complaining! Just asking the question.
It seems like while it eliminates the verbiage of "net to me" it is still keeping the implication of encouraging a friends and family deal just as the "net to me" statement was doing prior... Just taking the math out of it for the buyer.
I searched the rules and didn't see it strictly forbidden to post this way even though I thought I had explicitly read that sales posts be listed to include shipping and fees in the price.
I know the topic has been beaten to death and big strides were made with the rule change. I'm just curious about the clarity since there are still posts sliding through. It could very well be just the volume vs the small number of unpaid mods and admins too, in which case I'm not complaining! Just asking the question.