Edge retention of AUS-8A, VG-10 and D2 on hemp (Deerhunter)

Garretts :

Can you shed some light on the tradeoff between breaking strength and cutting ability?

Cutting ability of a knife can be quantified by the resistance of material to the passage of the blade. This resistance is caused by the material exerting forces on the knife as it is travelling through the material which is being cut. These forces fall under two basic categories; (a) those exerted against the edge, and (b) and those exerted against the body of the blade. The separation is necessary as the forces come from two different properties of the material and different materials can thus behave in very different ways in these two aspects. Cheese for example exerts very little force direct against an edge, but has a very high binding force on the sides of the blade. In comparison, hard shelled poly rope held under tension exerts a huge force against the edge, but induces very little binding or wedging action.

In more detail, as the edge of the knife meets the material being cut, the applied force has to rise until the induced pressure on the material being cut exceeds the ability of the material to withstand it. The material then ruptures [the materials resistance comes from a combination of its ductility and tensile strength] and starts to be cut. Since pressure is force divided by area, you can increase the pressure by simply applying more force, or sharpening the blade which decreases the area of the contact [in a number of ways]. The great thing about sharpening is that there is no drawback. It is a myth that sharper blades are weaker, take damage easier and go dull faster. So simply sharpen your blades to their maximum and enjoy greater cutting ability and durability.

If you are curious how sharpening can decrease the contact area and not get any weaker - after an an edge has been formed (the two bevels meet), sharpening can be separated into mainly two distinct processes. The first is alignment. Think of a saw blade that has the teeth stuck out in random directions. It will be horrible to cut with because all the teeth when pressed through the wood make different cuts. On a truly sharp blade all the teeth cut in the same line and thus progress is greatly speeded up. Since the teeth are all in the same line they are also much stronger. Make a cupping motion with your hand so all your finger tips are in line, now press them against something and see how they respond to the stress, they are a very strong unit. Now splay them all out from each other and again press. Now each finger can take the whole strain, and even worse it can induce severe bending and twisting loads. It is the same thing for the teeth on a knife edge.

The second thing that sharpening does is refine the size of the teeth, the edge will be more durable for impacts the greater the polish as the teeth get smaller, and the edge surface becomes more even. As the teeth get smaller, any force applied to them is at the end of a shorter arm, and thus produces less torque and is thus less likely to break off the teeth. Take a plastic comb and hold it by one end and and press down on the other. It is easy to break it off. Now hold it right by the same end you are pressing, without the leverage you can do nothing. The smaller teeth are thus much more resistant to being bent in the same way. The effect of the polish is also easy to demonstrate. Take a piece of 2x4 and saw and make a bunch of random deep cuts into the wood. Now compare how hard it is to break that 2x4 compared to one with no cuts. Make another one with more shallow cuts and do the same. You will note that there is a direct relationship between the frequency (amount) of cuts and their depth to the weakness of the board. A highly polished edge is analogous to the uncut 2x4.

Now back to cutting ability, the second component of the force that makes up the resistance you feel when cutting, comes from the material pressing on the sides of the blade. This force is essentially proportional to how far apart the material gets pushed in the cut. Since a thinner blade has to distort the material less, it is easier to cut with. Thus the solution is to make a blade really thin. The obvious question is then what is stopping you from making it really thin, like 1/64", or a tenth of a mm? When you cut with a blade, because you are not a machine, you will be twisting and torquing the blade all over the place, you might not notice it, but the the force in not uniform over the entire contact area and straight down from the spine. Even if you were a machine, the material you are cutting isn't going to be perfectly uniform and thus the changes in its consistency can cause the blade to experience all kinds of torques and twists. Thus a knife has to be thick enough to give it the necessary strength to be able to withstand the forces applied to it during a cut. So the optimal profile will be of a cross section that is just at this level, any more and you have strength which is of no use, but just lowers cutting ability.

Now there is a complication to this which can actually be fairly significant. Many materials can split during a cut, which can cause the material to fall away from the knife and thus reduce the force during a cut. Thus you can by reducing the blade thickness prevent this splitting and cause the material to actually wedge more tightly around the knife. Thus there is a level above the thinnest blade at which point the splitting can be great enough to overcome the increase in general resistance of the thicker blade. This is noticed on materials like woods and rigid vegetables. Materials like ropes, flesh, rubber, meats, fabrics, soft vegetation, etc., don't split, and thus on them you just make the knife as thin as possible with the requirement that the cross section have the necessary strength and stiffness as noted previously.

Did the Japanese sword smiths take this to it's ultimate and final conclusion...

Japanese cutting tools in general have the cross section close to the absolute minimum and thus the cutting ability near optimal. They have low requirements for durability as they place a very high emphasis on skill and tool selection. They also have a very high standard for sharpness. Even a very cheap production Japanese kitchen knife will be at a sharpness level above most western customs and will surpass nearly all in cutting ability.

Must a good sword be differentially tempered?

No. There are steels which have both a very high toughness at a decent hardness. The argument could be made though that since the gain in toughness is much faster than the loss of strength, it would be beneficial in general to drop the spine a couple of RC points as you would gain a lot of impact durability with the loss of very little overall lateral strength.

... does this limit it's construction to carbon steels which can be reasonably treated in this way?

No, you can differentially harden stainless steels. They can be edge quenched in oil for a mild difference, spine drawn while the edge is cooled, and possibly differentiated by the use of plate quenching with plates of a different thickness with an insulative buffer and possibly preheated.

Do some of the high tech stainless steels have a greater breaking strength in the annealed condition than carbon steels?

The stainless steels are very strong in general. However this strength comes at the sacrifice of a very low impact toughness and ductility which makes them in general unsuitable for swords and other high impact blades.

phwl :

[corrosion resistance testing]

Yes, however the primary purpose of the "review" was to actually to do durability work, so I have to wait until that is done before soaking them, as deep pitting would influence the breaking points. There should be enough left over however to provide information on surface damage and edge effects from corrosion.

Steelhed, thanks for the offer, I'll send you an email.

UltraSteele :

Yes, the D2 is ~100% ahead of the VG-10. It took about three times as much material to induce the same loss of edge aggression on the D2 Deerhunter as on the AUS-8A one.

-Cliff
 
Cliff - I was wondering about the surface finish. Can you tell the steels apart from the finish?
 
Cliff - I was wondering about the surface finish. Can you tell the steels apart from the finish?
 
Originally posted by Cliff Stamp
Ease of sharpening is one of the biggest over hyped and largest knife myths on the market. Ease of sharpening is influenced mainly by how well the steel choice and knife geometry suits the class of knife.
-Cliff [/B]

Amen. Glad you put this in "print", so to speak, along side an objective test.

At a given hardness, the difference in the alloys is noticeable in the extremes (e.g. 420V vs. AUS-8) but not such a big issue.

Hardness does seem to effect ease of sharpening more so than does alloy composition, from what I can tell (no objective or side-by-side sharpening).
 
Informative and well done, Cliff.(and this come from a sometimes skeptic) Alot of sensible info here.;)
 
Cliff - I await your e-mail. It will be interesting to see how ATS-34 compares to VG-10 and D2. If I had to predict I would say D2 will outperform ATS-34.
 
Sorry, but I'm still unable to believe that D2 holds an edge 100% longer than VG10. D2 might be a better edge holder, but not 100% better.
 
One obtuse question - where do you get hemp rope? All I can find is Manilla and Sistal. Are they the same? Thanks.
 
pwhl :

Can you tell the steels apart from the finish?

No. D2 is very difficult to polish, but it can be taken to a high finish if desired, a few makers even mirror polish it, I think Brend does.

Danbo, the percentages refelct the amount of rope needed to be cut to induce a given state of blunting, because blunting is nonlinear they are indeed very large. If instead the percentages were taken as ratios of the sharpness after a given amount of material was cut, they would be much lower. For example, this would be such a rank after the 254 pieces of hemp rope were cut :

D2 -> 100
VG -> 76 +/- 7
A8 -> 62 +/- 5

However such a ranking, while common, makes little sense because knife users don't tend to sharpen knives after cutting a certain amount of material, but after they reach a certain state of blunting. Thus what is meaningful is how much material needs to be cut for a knife to reach a certain state of performance. This makes matters complicated because the rankings are then dependent on when you choose to stop.

Again because blunting is nonlinear, you can see very large changes in this respect in RC changes and to a lesser extent (on hemp) carbide formation. If blunting was linear both ratios would be identical. And again, the percentages I quoted were rough in the sense that I just eyeballed them from the graph, to get a more precise estimate you would want to interpolate the curves.

swede79 :

All I can find is Manilla and Sistal.

Hemp just means plant fiber, both Manilla and Sisal are both made from hemp but from two different plants. Manilla comes from Musa textilis and Sisal from Agave sisalana. The cord I use is manilla. "Hemp" used by itself usually means cord from cannabis fiber, I was sloppy in the above and should be saying manilla instead of hemp. It doesn't matter what kind of rope you use, as long as you keep using the same cord.

-Cliff
 
The D2 one is again ahead, by about 100% over the VG-10 one. The difference here is great enough that you can feel a large difference in the cutting, it remains more aggressive on the rope for far longer.

Cliff-

When you say "more aggressive" here, could you feel any difference between the steels in how they cut on some materials, when they were all at the same level of sharpness? Or did you only feel the described difference as caused by the D2's retained sharpness, in comparison to the others after they had blunted significantly?


If there was a noticeable difference in how the three steels behaved on some materials when equally sharp, could you describe that difference in "feel"? Subjective, I realize, but interesting given that these blades are so similar in geometry.

Thanks again,
Will
 
Will :

Or did you only feel the described difference as caused by the D2's retained sharpness, in comparison to the others after they had blunted significantly?

Yes exactly. By aggression I mean how much the knife would slice into the rope under a certain load. As the D2 started to pull ahead because of the greater edge retention, it was able to bite in more on the cord and thus cut it under a lower force. The other blades were slipping more. If you wanted to be quantitative, you could describe aggression on the slice as the improvement over a straight push. Very slick edges like those highly polished require the same amount of force on a slice as on a push - no aggression. Highly aggressive edges can reduce the force required by 1/2 or more. When the blades were freshly sharpened they were identical under magnification and the cutting ability was not significantly different. If the edges on all were taken down low, say under 15 degrees included, I would suspect edge differences would start to emerge, especially under high polishes.

-Cliff
 
Is it possible for you to make a subjective comparison between the D2 and some of your experiences with Boye dendritic steel?
 
Originally posted by Cliff Stamp
When the blades were freshly sharpened they were identical under magnification and the cutting ability was not significantly different. If the edges on all were taken down low, say under 15 degrees included, I would suspect edge differences would start to emerge, especially under high polishes.
That's what I was after--thanks, Cliff. That's good corroboration for the argument that edge finish and geometry, especially for "normal" working edges, are by far the dominant factors in cutting effectiveness and edge "aggression", and that steel type has only nominal importance at most.

Thanks again, Cliff.

-Will
 
brownshoe :

[D2 vs Boye dendritic steel]

The following page has the AUS-8A Deerhunter compared to a Boye Dendritic Cobalt and 440C blade :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/dendritic_aus_8.html

[yes it is crude comparison but it is three years old, I cleaned it up a little before referencing it]

Based on how the 440C blade so dominated the AUS-8A blade in the extended cutting session, I would put it in a similar class as D2 in that regard. To be frank though, Dendritic steels suffer from rather high fragility, but as pure cutting tools, Boye hunters would fare well against any blade.


Will :

... edge finish and geometry, especially for "normal" working edges, are by far the dominant factors in cutting effectiveness and edge "aggression"

Yes, geometry defines performance, steel defines geometry

-Cliff
 
Originally posted by pwhl
Cliff - I was wondering about the surface finish. Can you tell the steels apart from the finish?
Originally posted by Steelhed
Cliff - I have a Deerhunter in ATS-34.
Been reading through this thread again, because I got to visit with a friend today, who had Deerhunters in all 4 steels, including 2 in AUS-8A. They were part of a collection, so no comments on performance differences, but the ATS-34 one was mirror polished, while the others were satin, and I wondered if Steelhed's ATS-34 DH was also polished(?). Just curious.


btw, he gave me his extra 8A one, and after touching up the edge, I've been cutting up everything in sight, and am very impressed with the cutting ability. The handle is a perfect fit for my hand, too. I may buy another one in D2...
 
I do have a brief comment....... more of an observation really.

I have field dressed, skinned, and quartered several whitetail deer of compairable body size with the AUS-8A & the ATS-34.

The AUS-8A never made it totally through the process with one deer before I needed to resharpen. HOWEVER, I can return it to shaving sharp with almost anything I have at hand in a matter of seconds.

The ATS-34 will make it through approxmiately one and three quarters deer before I need to resharpen. It resharpens easily also..... but to me not as easily as the AUS-8A.

Due to technical diffulcity this deer season.....
:eek: ..... I was unable to test the VG-10 & D-2............. :(

This will either have to wait for a fresh 'road kill' .... [ I'm not proud....:D ....] or next season.

Compaired to what has already been posted here............ this is not much....... but my .02 worth.

chuck ..... :)

edit for PS <> A hearty "thank you" to Cliff for all his work here...... :)
 
Originally posted by teacher
I have field dressed, skinned, and quartered several whitetail deer of compairable body size with the AUS-8A & the ATS-34.
See where ASSuming gets me:footinmou

Thanks again for my Deerhunter:D
 
you are welcome sir......... it could not have gone to a finer home..........:) .... don't even think twice about the assumption........ I probably did not make myself clear when we were talking the other day........... :D .... to many 'blue boxes' around...............:eek: :D

chuck
 
I dont like AUS-8 and AUS-8A.
I saw many web page with telling"this kinfe is made from Hitachi AUS".
This steel is made by japanese Aichi-steel.
Stain is easy to formed on this steel,so it is sometimes not beautiful.And also wear resistance of this steel is inferior to ATS-34.I know some person who was disappointed in Japan.
 
Back
Top