No, that is not how this design is supposed to work traditionally. The sides are supposed to hold the blade together after the harder core steel has cracked. If this was indeed Fallkniven's goal, I guess that's up to them. But what happened here is not what people usually talk about when they're praising the virtues of laminated blades.
Is it not? Funny, in Scandinavia the laminate design is just supposed to make the blade less likely to break - while maintaining the advantages of having a steel (core) that cuts and holds an edge better than the soft laminate sides and is therefore less tough and more likely to snap, crackle and pop. In this case, lamination made the knife less likely to break completely. Sounds like success to me. You're talking about a very specific kind of stress, and one that the blade did not encounter in this test. You're talking, for example, about chopping something so damn hard that the core cracks. Yes, in that case the laminate sides should keep the blade together. But things work differently when you stress the blade differently. When you're standing on the handle of a laminated blade slapped into a vise, the stress isn't directly on the core as it is when you're chopping, it's on the soft laminated sides. I really don't know why you don't see this, but hey, as I said, I've been known to be wrong more than occasionally - I'm not a bladesmith, I just use 'em.