no worries bud, the only "dumbass" is the guy who never asks questions.
re: grinds, there are many pluses and minuses folks can say about each grind, contingent on their personal preferences, tastes, etc.
ultimately, both the hollow grind and flat grind Striders will perform very well in the field.
perhaps, what we have here is more of an asethetic issue than not?
hollow grinds are achieved by the radius found in a grinder wheel. flat grinds are done on flat platen attachment in between two grinder wheels.
hollow grinds have IMO always looked very sexy because of their deep contouring and contrast against the rest of the blade. however, because of the metal removed, the decrease in actual blade mass may be perceived ad "weakening" the blade as we move towards the cutting edge. ie, chisel grinds which have the least amount of mass removed are sometimes believed up to 30% "stronger" than a hollow grind.
flat grinds remove less blade mass and therefore may be perceived as stronger than a hollow grind, plus the cross section of the grind shows that due to the less concave shape, help in "pushing" material away while cutting thru material, esp. noticeable thru something like flesh. hollow grinds create a bit suction thru wet materials. a good test is to cut thru gel medium (stuff used in ballistic tests), to see how each blade grind "feels" while cutting.
i think one of the best blade grinds is the convex type where material is pushed even further away while cutting. this is grind is achieved thru grinding on a slack belt, but a more time consuming process.
overall, if you look at the hollow ground striders, the back or spine of the blade is longer or wider if measured from the perpindicular to the horizon, and less wide when observed on the newer flat grind striders.
both may actually equal each other in measured weight or mass.
i have not yet had a chance to compare two of the same model with both grinds, but when some more MFS's come in we might take 2 examples out to the "TAD blade proving grounds" (our parking lot) and give them both a run thru a variety of materials to see for our selves.
-pm