True, but I don't believe I have claimed that anyone is going to become a swordsman as the result of this seminar. The primary value of this class, so far as instruction goes, is to lay out the basic principles and explain how to read the manual (it uses sophisticated, but sometimes haphazard, organization). The instructor, Mr. Bob Charron, does not claim to be an expert on this subject matter. I believe he once said "I'm on the twenty year plan." Another factor that complicates this is the fact that the manual is intended to be a reference for advanced students. So students of this work must deduce basic principles from advanced applications. No easy task.
As to the self-defense applications of this teaching... again, no single weekend class is going to adequately equip you for that. Many of the basic concepts are directly applicable to contemporary self-defense, as are a few of the techniques. On the other hand, most of the techniques were designed for use in specific conditions which rarely (if ever) occur today. I can't remember the last time I saw someone walking around with a longsword on their hip (and I'm a member of the SCA).
I think the reason most people take this class is for historical interest. It is absolutely fascinating to see just how well-developed martial theory and technique were in the Middle Ages. I have discussed some of the theories and techniques with practioners of other martial arts and they are invariably surprised by this. Some people take the class to prepare for rebated-steel combat, but that's another subject entirely.
Thanks, again, for your time.
John Jordan
btw If you are interested I have the e-mail address of two folks in Speedway who have taken this class.