- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Messages
- 1,339
I like to stay dry.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
What about washable wool blankets that have been out a few years? Also any kind of wool makes my hubby itch. Me, I like wool and cotton.
Payette, I remember when that article surfaced in 2009... great read... it says that wool can absorbss 30% of it's weight in water before feeling wet and makes no claim to 90% of anything. I'm a fan of wool but where are your sources for the 90% claims?
^ Give me the *SCIENCE*!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
I believe Tesco sells a sleeping bag, probably with a good amount of chicken feathers in it, and for weight, volume, and performance I don't think you'd need anything better than that to trounce an equivalent weight of wool blanket. Clearly that bag is pretty low end so I'll say any bag exceeding such a humble baseline standard as that, then I don't need to type a great bit list of stuff.
a local woolworker out of McCall
Source: Australian Wool Innovation [a trade organization] This quote is the norm for wool trade organizations except that 30% is the typical number and "one-third" is also used, both without separate consideration of Merino wool. (Retailers of wool garments and wool housing insulation make more extravagant claims but cite no sources for those claims.)The weight of water able to be absorbed by a fibre [sic] as a percentage of its dry weight is known as its regain. For synthetics the regain can be as low as 1%, while for cotton it’s 24%. Merino has the highest regain of the popular textiles with an ability to absorb 35% of its own dry weight in water (Fig 1).
. Although microfibers do some strange things that are hard to explain, as documented in a Nantuk (sp?) Center study that I read a few months ago.there may be some air trapped in the saturated garment with all the water.
Not if you believe the crap that gets posted here. When people make their ridiculous performance statements about wool in relation to synthetics, you'll notice "synthetics" is all they say. I have never once seen any of them explain how great any particular type of wool is in comparison to a specific synthetic material, and expect that I never will.Maybe I'm not giving synthetics a fair shake from the get go.
I would think that wool would be great for you in the conditions you often describe and show pics of, but you mentioned wet weather hovering around freezing-that is typical for winter here, and I do prefer some synthetics, including several of the Polartec renditions, a majority of the time....