James Bond's Walther PPK?

I know the PPK was carried by some undercover soldiers/police/security service bods in Northern Ireland during "the Troubles" & Im pretty sure it was also sometimes carried by RAF pilots, too.

I remember reading about an attack/kidnap attempt on Princess Anne (The Queens daughter) in the 70's & the PPK carried by her Police Bodyguard suffered an untimely stoppage. I believe that the incident stopped them carrying Walthers after that.
 
Usually you are just ignorant, today you are downright dangerous.

Nothing like advising to carry a non drop safe firearm with the safety off.

Says the ignorant man.

PPK's are perfectly safe to carry with the safety off and hammer down. They have passed drop safety tests in states like california with flying colors. Plenty of PPK owners carry this way without incident and it is perfectly safe. There are plenty of gun boards out there which you can visit to confirm this.

However if this makes you squeamish then carry with the safety on. The option is yours. That was my original point and it is still completely valid.


Flawed and obsolete, no need to bother addressing the rest of your ignorance...

Are you volunteering as a test subject, because I think you'd be surprised just how un-obsolete my PPK is.
 
Thank you for sharing your expertise with us. :thumbup:

How would you compare the modern Sig P232 with the modern Walther PPK (made by S&W now?)? Also, how would you compare the Makarov design with the mentioned pistols? Any South American designs that you recommend, similar to these guns?

Thanks.

You are welcome.

I have little experience with the P232 or the new S&W made PPK outside of handling them. They both seem to be well made, and I understand that they are both reliable pistols. However, my own preference would be for the SIG, which has a rather interesting history. (To me, anyway…)

The P232 - was based off of the earlier SIG P230, which was designed to fill a German police requirement (due to the 1972 Olympic Munich massacre) for a more powerful blow-back pistol than the commonly issued .32 caliber Walther PP and PPK. The P230’s original caliber was "9mm Police", (aka "9x18 Ultra", a pre-WWII German cartridge design) which was a more powerful cartridge than either .32 ACP or .380 ACP, but NOT as powerful as a full-sized 9mmP, which was thought to be too over penetrative for use in crowded German cities. (BTW - Walther also developed a pistol chambered for the 9mm Police called the “PP Super”.) However, this experiment with a proprietary “police-only” caliber did not last long. The high incidents of terrorist attacks in Germany during the late ‘70’s convinced the German police to switch to full power 9mm pistols. This lead to a series of trials in Germany to find the “best of the best”, which led to the development and introduction of pistols like the H&K P7, the SIG P225, and the Walther P5. The adoption of these pistols made the 9mm Police concept obsolete. SIG, wishing to keep the P230 on the market, rechambered the pistol for .380 ACP. As I mentioned in my earlier post, the “cutting-edge” design of the P230 took many of its features from the earlier Sauer 38H. The new P232 is a product improved version of the P230.

The Makarov - Following the end of the Second World War, the Soviet Army stripped Nazi Germany of much of its extensive small arms manufacturing capabilities. Entire factories, such as the Walther plant in Zella-Mehlis were literally dismantled, then shipped to Russia. Advanced designs for ammunition and weapons were seized, as well as state of the art machine tooling and metal forming equipment. In addition, many captured German arms technicians were sentenced by the USSR for various "war crimes" and forced to work for Soviet state armament factories. The impact that captured German personal, technology and manufacturing techniques had on Russian weapons design was radical. By the early 1950's a entirely new family of small arms like the RPK, the AK47 and the Makarov had been developed and introduced into the Soviet military. These German influenced designs were years ahead of previous Russian small arms, and rivaled or bested the most advanced Free world weapons of the time. The handgun that replaced the Tokarev TT33 pistol in Russian service was the PM, or "Pistolet Makarov". Designed to be both more reliable under battlefield conditions and easier to manufacture than the Browning derived Tokarev, the PM entered service with Soviet military forces early in 1951. The PM shares a close resemblance to a scaled-up Walther PP. And like the Walther, the Makarov is double action and blowback operated. Because of this, and the excessive mania Communist Russia had for keeping its weapons secret, lead many Western ordinance experts to dismiss the Makarov as nothing more than a direct Walther copy. There is no doubt that the PM was influenced by the Walther PP/PPK, as the method of takedown, the placement of the safety and the recoil spring are the same on both pistol designs. However, internally the Makarov is very different and is much simpler, with only 25 parts to the entire weapon, compared to 42 for the Walther PP. The slide mounted hammer drop safety blocks the free floating inertial firing pin. Unusual for a safety of this type, the Makarov system also locks the slide. In addition, it works opposite of the standard Walther or Smith & Wesson pattern, moving up for safe, and down to fire. The magazine release, which doubles as the hammer mainspring, is located on the butt. Field stripping the Makarov duplicates the Walther PP/PPK pistols. The quality of these pistols is surprisingly good to excellent, especially considering the low prices that they were sold for. The East German Pi-M is generally agreed to be the best in terms of manufacturing quality and finish. Newer manufactured Russian, Bulgarian and Chinese guns are a little rougher in fit and finish. Trigger pulls on the Makarov vary greatly depending on the country of manufacture, with the East German pistols being the best in this regard, followed closely by the Bulgarian models. The trigger pull on my German Pi-M is a smooth 9 1/2 pound double action, and 6 pounds single action. Chinese and Russian guns commonly have slightly heavier and rougher triggers. However, Makarov triggers are generally lighter than the trigger pulls normally found on the Walther PP/PPK. Typical accuracy is excellent for a pistol of its type, most examples averaging 2 1/2 to 4 inches at 15 meters.

The 9x18mm cartridge - Following the usual post-war Soviet element of standardizing on cartridges used by no other country, the PM is chambered for the unique 9x18mm round, derived from the German 9mm Ultra ammunition experiments of the 1930's. Mild recoiling in the Makarov and quite accurate, the 9x18mm was intended to obtain maximum ballistics from a simple blowback design. However, the standard 9x18 cartridge is in reality much closer to a .380 than the 9mm Parabellum in actual performance. Bullet weight in the full metal case military load is 95 grains, and has a optimistically claimed velocity of 1050 fps out of the PM. Designated a 9mm, the Makarov bullet measures .363 inch compared to the .355 inch diameter bullet of a standard .380 or 9mm. Also, the 18mm case length, being 1mm longer than the common .380 ACP (9x17) and 1mm shorter than the NATO standard 9mm Parabellum (9x19), ensures that neither round will properly chamber in the Makarov.

The Argentinean Bersa pistols base their design off the Walther PP/PPK. Good quality, but nowhere near as expensive as the Walther. About the only complaint, (outside of rough triggers and the odd feed problem) is that some folks find that the multitude of safeties on the pistol (slide, frame and magazine) can make the pistol hard to get into action quickly.

TR Graham
The Glocksmith
 
Last edited:
PPK's are perfectly safe to carry with the safety off and hammer down. They have passed drop safety tests in states like california with flying colors.

What if you don't live in California? :D

Plenty of PPK owners carry this way without incident and it is perfectly safe. There are plenty of gun boards out there which you can visit to confirm this.

However if this makes you squeamish then carry with the safety on. The option is yours. That was my original point and it is still completely valid.

Flip a coin 100 times. If it comes up "heads" 100 out of 100 times, what are the chances it'll come up "heads" on the 101st?

If it's a possibility, it's a possibility, and no matter how many people are OK with that, that doesn't negate the possibility. Same as if a guy fires his gun 100 times, has a misfeed jam, then fires it 900 more without incident. That one misfeed will always be on the owner's mind (or at least should be).

As for the PPK itself, I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment. But if indeed it's built without a drop safety, and there's the possibility of a round going off when the gun is dropped, no matter how slim, to me that sounds outdated and flawed. And with safer alternatives, I personally would shy from the PPK, at least as a CCW.
 
Last edited:
If it's a possibility, it's a possibility, and no matter how many people are OK with that, that doesn't negate the possibility. Same as if a guy fires his gun 100 times, has a misfeed jam, then fires it 900 more without incident. That one misfeed will always be on the owner's mind (or at least should be).

Its a possibility that I could be run over a bus tomorrow, or be hit by lightning, but I'm still going to go out tomorrow, raining or not.

The PPK in its current form has passed every drop test that I am aware of. So, while it may be technically possible for a round to go off if the pistol is dropped, it is so outside the realm of possibilities that to call it "unsafe" isn't correct by any measure.

Its been my experience that the people who bitch about things like this are usually the same people who dont carry jumper cables, a tire gauge, or any of the other things that would help them in situations that are far more likely to happen. Of course, arguing about the merits of having jumper cables is nowhere near as fun as trumping a non issue with firearms.
 
As for the PPK itself, I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment. But if indeed it's built without a drop safety, and there's the possibility of a round going off when the gun is dropped, no matter how slim, to me that sounds outdated and flawed. And with safer alternatives, I personally would shy from the PPK, at least as a CCW.

Gents,

Before this goes on much further.......

The PP came out in 1929...the PPK in 1931. If these pistols were unsafe and had a tendency to "go off" when dropped, do you folks think that the Walther PP and PPK would have had the world-wide use and popularity that they have had?

I certainly don't think so.

It is true that the Walther PP/PPK pistols do not have a firing pin safety or a "drop safety"... However, they DO have an inertial firing pin (the pin is automatically retracted by a spring) and the hammer has a spring loaded flap that prevents the hammer from moving forward to contact the firing pin unless the trigger is fully pulled to the rear. You would have to drop the pistol from a considerable height DIRECTLY ON ITS MUZZLE before the inertia of the firing pin could overcome the firing pin spring in order for the pistol to fire. If it fell onto its hammer, a large piece of metal would have to break and somehow move out of the way of the hammer before the hammer could touch the firing pin. Either of these events are HIGHLY unlikely.....

Many, MANY popular and commonly used firearms do not have a mechanism to lock the firing pin. Most of them use a spring loaded inertial firing pin system. No lock, just a spring around the pin to retract it.

A very short list off the top of my head would include :

1911 Colts up to the Series 70 models
the Tokarev
all early model Browning High Powers (at one time, the most widely used military service pistol in the world)
most Star, Astra and Llama pistols
most .22 caliber automatics (older Rugers, S&W, Colt, Browning)
Mauser HsC
H&K P4

And some don't even have a spring to retract the firing pin. The firing pin "floats" back and forth in the slide (or bolt) as the weapon cycles.

Some examples :

the Makarov
all AR series rifles (yup, the M16.....!)
all AK and AKM rifles

Even without a mechanism "locking" the firing pin, these guns don't normally "go off" when roughly handled or dropped...

There are many more. Just because a firearm does not have a firing pin lock does not mean that it is "unsafe". This has been proven in many guns over the course of many years. And just because a weapon has a firing pin or "drop" safety doesn't mean that it is fool-proof....mechanical safeties can break.

Just ask any gunsmith.

TR Graham
The Glocksmith
 
Last edited:
And just because a weapon has a firing pin or "drop" safety doesn't mean that it is fool-proof....mechanical safeties can break.

+1

The only safety is the one between your ears. No amount of mechanical safetys will change this.
 
while i have never had an AD when dropping a pistol (if you carry one a lot you will eventually drop the thing, i am as anal about the finish on my stuff as anyone and take great care with things but even with all this i still do drop things every now & again) i dropped a cocked & locked series 70 1911 .45 right on the muzzle, it dropped hard too, i ejected the round and the primer had a serious dimple in it, i bet 1/10,000" more and i woulda had a AD, i think it would have shot straight down thank the lord, but anyway point being a pistol which has zero chance of an AD when dropped is not a bad thing, especially on a pistol which ya are gonna edc because if you do edc it you will eventually drop it no matter how carefull ya are..

do i think a PP series is likely to have an AD when dropped? i would say its highly unlikely, but its possible, maybe.

do i think the PP series is obsolte? no, i do think there are better choices these days for an edc pistol, the PP series is an older design but its still fairly safe and will kill you stone dead just as it did in 1929 so i dont think obsolete.
 
Bond had a .32 Beretta which he liked and was given / forced to take the PPK in .380 by 'M'.
You're off by a caliber. Bond used a .25 Beretta 418 up until the end of From Russia With Love, where his gun got stuck in his waistband, allowing Rosa Kleb to hit him with a poisoned shoe-knife. A Court of Inquiry finds the gun at fault (so like the British to fault a gun) and M orders Bond to carry something knew. Bond switches to the PPK, which was a fairly common plainclothes police pistol. His is in 7.65mm. He is also issued a Centennial Airweight revolver.
 
Bond switches to the PPK, which was a fairly common plainclothes police pistol. His is in 7.65mm. He is also issued a Centennial Airweight revolver.

True. In "Dr. No", Fleming described it as a "brutal, stumpy revolver". Bond used the S&W against members of a tracking party sent aganst him as well as a "dragon", a swamp tractor rigged up with a metal body and a flamethrower.....while the Walther (presumably) stayed back in his hotel room....:)

TR Graham
The Glocksmith
 
Last edited:
I'd prefer the Centennial over any PPK for dragons, myself. :)

Tom, you don't have a PP/K/S?
Bust open one of those cases of Glocks you have in the basement & do some trading!
Denis
 
Says the ignorant man.

PPK's are perfectly safe to carry with the safety off and hammer down. They have passed drop safety tests in states like california with flying colors. Plenty of PPK owners carry this way without incident and it is perfectly safe. There are plenty of gun boards out there which you can visit to confirm this.

However if this makes you squeamish then carry with the safety on. The option is yours. That was my original point and it is still completely valid.




Are you volunteering as a test subject, because I think you'd be surprised just how un-obsolete my PPK is.
Obsolete doesn't mean no longer works. :rolleyes:

By the way, your lame back sided threats of violence don't just show your weakness own shortcomings.

The PPK was a serious option back when every other offered auto was much bigger and heavier, but you had to compromise on the anemic cartridge. Now you can get 9mm, .40 s/w, .45, .357, and .357 sig in a comparable size package and much lighter...and drop safe. Thus, the PPK is obsolete. What does the PPK have going for it? A fictional character...ooooooo, hold me back. When you can get a 9mm in the same size as a .380, the .380 is obsolete.;)

BTW, I have two of them, fun to shoot, for an obsolete bit of history.

Another flaw is that at the very base of the barrel, where the spring rests, mosture can collect and cause significant rust in the non-stainless versions. But, I'm sure someone of your kurz caliber knew that.
 
Gents,

Before this goes on much further.......
1911 Colts up to the Series 70 models
the Tokarev
all early model Browning High Powers (at one time, the most widely used military service pistol in the world)
most Star, Astra and Llama pistols
most .22 caliber automatics (older Rugers, S&W, Colt, Browning)
Mauser HsC
H&K P4

Hardly a list that argues against obsolescence, and I'd wager if you sent in an old Ruger, it would get a "fix".
 
I have owned 2 PPK's and 1 TPH. All American made before S&W took over. None were reliable and believe me, I tried many diferent loads. The PPK's would fail to feed on a regular basis. The TPH was in .22lr. It functioned well with solids but not hp. It also suffered 2 broken extractors. I have heard that S&W has sorted it out but I have no experience with them. My PP German made in the early 70's is beautiful and totaly reliable. Both PPK's and the PP are .380 acp.
 
Current Smiths are sharp & need work to remove external edges. They also have an additional hammer strut that wasn't there in the original Walther design.
They can be reliable enough for use.
The unaltered S&W PPK I tried three or four years ago worked well enough.
Denis
 
The PPK was a serious option back when every other offered auto was much bigger and heavier, but you had to compromise on the anemic cartridge. Now you can get 9mm, .40 s/w, .45, .357, and .357 sig in a comparable size package and much lighter...and drop safe. Thus, the PPK is obsolete. What does the PPK have going for it? A fictional character...ooooooo, hold me back. When you can get a 9mm in the same size as a .380, the .380 is obsolete.

BTW, I have two of them, fun to shoot, for an obsolete bit of history.

Zen,

In context with the wide choice of powerful compact pistols we have today, you are right, the PP/PPK pistols could be considered "obsolete".

However, you fail to take into account the PP and PPKs' long use as a military and police service pistol. The German military used them from 1933 until 1945. German police use was even longer. In fact, I saw German police toting PP's in the early 1980's. Up until a few years ago the Kentucky State police issued US-made PPK/S' as backup guns, and I personally know many police officers here in Texas (and elsewhere) that carry a PPK or PPK/S as either a backup or off duty weapon. Many, many countries issued the PP or PPK to their military and police forces, or copied the design. (I could compile a list for you, but it would be quite long) This was not due to Ian Fleming "arming" his fictional character James Bond with it....no, it was because the PP/PPK were well made, accurate, durable, light, handy, reasonable powerful and safe pistols. The Walther design is seminal, with many "modern" pistols (such as the Beretta M9, our current service pistol) incorporating features first used on the PP/PPK. The original concept may be “obsolete”, but the design of the Walther is still highly regarded.

[QUOTE Another flaw is that at the very base of the barrel, where the spring rests, mosture can collect and cause significant rust in the non-stainless version.[/QUOTE]

Zen, name me any firearm that does not have a weak point in its design and I'll buy you a cigar. :) Personally I'm glad they ALL do, because as a gunsmith, that is how I make my living. :D However, I have to say I have never seen this happen on a well maintained pistol. And I've been working with and on firearms since 1977.....

[QUOTE Hardly a list that argues against obsolescence, and I'd wager if you sent in an old Ruger, it would get a "fix".[/QUOTE]

You think the 1911 or the M16 is obsolete? Many people would argue the point with you. And there are newly manufactured 1911 models that do not have a firing pin safety. About the Rugers - I'd take that bet. It is my understanding that the older Mark I and Mark II Rugers cannot be easily retrofitted with the firing pin safety now used on the current models. However, the lack of a firing pin safety does not make the millions of older Ruger pistols "unsafe". Unless it was originally an integral part of the design, (like the Walther P38, or a Glock pistol for example) the addition of a "firing pin safety" is just a way to keep idiots (and their lawyers) from suing a company out of existence....

TR Graham
The Glocksmith
 
Last edited:
I'd prefer the Centennial over any PPK for dragons, myself. :)

Tom, you don't have a PP/K/S?
Bust open one of those cases of Glocks you have in the basement & do some trading!
Denis

Denis, I own a number of PP, PPK, and PPK/S pistols. (German pre & post war, French, and US made)

And that's not counting the "clones" and "near-clones" like the FEG, ERMA, Detonics, and Indian Arms pistols.....

TR Graham
The Glocksmith
 
I would strongly disagree with the broad statement that a .380 is at least the equal of a standard .38 Special load.
Denis
A standard .38 Load is ther old black powder load. 158 gr at somewhere in the neighbor hood of 800 fps out of a concealable pistol, right?
 
Back
Top