- Joined
- Oct 30, 2005
- Messages
- 5,171
Or you could take it to w&c ,,,,,,
1234,,,,,,
The Guyon suggested such and failed to start - a lack of action that is the norm.
Or you could take it to w&c ,,,,,,
1234,,,,,,
I think these tests are a waste of money, but it does give you a good benchmark. You want a survival knife that can take some abuse, don't you?
On the other hand, he does abuse some other knives. Like a cheapo Mora. You're never going to take that as a abuse knife (a hard working knife isn't the same as abuse), so that's just a waste of a perfectly good (though cheap) knife.
Strange how people fail to research before making a comment. Beat it through concrete and it will fail, so it is a piece of junk?
....
Wheres this "beat it through concrete" test at?
Strange how people fail to research before making a comment. Beat it through concrete and it will fail, so it is a piece of junk?
The Mora is the foremost survival knife in use. A version of the one tested was one of the Official Nato survival knives.
http://www.grannysstore.com/Wilderness_Survival/Survival_Knives.htm
It is the most common second knife wilderness campers and travellers carry. Cheap great, but it has repeatedly proven itself in the field.
Yeah, okay, Mora is a wrong example. Of course breaking something on concrete is useless, and not an indication for something at all. That's not what I was implying either. But what if it doesn't break? I've seen some knifes like the Izula that DON'T break if you whack it at concrete. I think that says a lot.
Survival Knife is the one you have on you when the poo hits the fan. Most of the crisies on the news of people dying in the wilderness deals with the Darwin syndrome. The best knife most often would not have helped these ijats but a whole lot of preparation would have. Most large knives cannot be used to repair cars whereas the humble SAK is a major friend when in need.
Nozz proponents tend to use the survival angle to justify their argument. Lifts, walls etc. The Mora and SAK would thus be huge failures. Opening a lift, take SAK remove door panel on the mechanism over the door, open door. Absolute familiarity with your knife is also necessary, buying and storing is not a good practice.
That is subjective, non-scientific review and is not in the humorous league of Statler and Waldorf.
The Guyon suggested such and failed to start - a lack of action that is the norm.
Survival Knife is the one you have on you when the poo hits the fan. Most of the crisies on the news of people dying in the wilderness deals with the Darwin syndrome. The best knife most often would not have helped these ijats but a whole lot of preparation would have. Most large knives cannot be used to repair cars whereas the humble SAK is a major friend when in need.
Nozz proponents tend to use the survival angle to justify their argument. Lifts, walls etc. The Mora and SAK would thus be huge failures. Opening a lift, take SAK remove door panel on the mechanism over the door, open door. Absolute familiarity with your knife is also necessary, buying and storing is not a good practice.
This is a smart post, and it speaks to the way in which knife reviews conducted out of context can provide a false sense of competency--especially reviews purportedly aimed at determining some measure of toughness. I've seen where Nozz does some outdoor chopping tests, but certainly not with every knife. The more common M.O. involves taking a knife straight to destruction trials. Some of his advocates come across as folks who buy "tough knives" with the idea that the blades will miraculously save them in an emergency. Countless precedents have shown, however, that survival is more about the skills and mettle between the ears than the technologies in hand.
Personally I like tough knives, that's why I love my Busses, but I also have some Cold Steel and HI blades.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a fan of good tools, knives or otherwise. However, to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to knives, I rely on a variety of accounts from people who actually use them instead of the hammer-pounding frenzies of the Nozzinator.
...
Is that right? I thought I invited folks to post in a certain thread in W&C. No one in this thread had the cojones to do so.
I don't recall the Guyon's invite to a specific post. Where? What post was a specific W&C thread noted by the Guyon? Perhaps those blackouts discussed earlier by the Guyon are affecting the memory of the Guyon.
Have fun reading this thread. It's there. Perhaps orthogonal1 should slow down. I hear hookers and fast cars will wear a man down after a while.
No quote from the post mentioning a specific W&C post? Didn't think so.
...
What? No "Still waiting for the wonderful reviews of the Guyon using the scientific methods the Guyon has devised."?
You sorely disappoint.