- Joined
- Jun 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,720
I've never posted here, but I am interested in the production( BR/KSF) Recluse. I read in a search where Andy and others have come to the realization that rear handle swells ( I'm assuming where the handle either drops down near the rear/wider at the sides) is a limiting feature in regards to handle grip comfort and knives produced without this are better suited overall to a variety of handholds and general better usage overall.
I own mostly factory knives ( Only one custom actually, A Skookum BT) I am approaching the end ( Ha Ha ) of my knife aquisition as I have way too much money accumulated in knives. I have trouble deciding on my next knife recently and my criteria is getting,shall I say, more precise. I have always thought of the handle swell as a good feature, "locking" in my grip , but have started to find it rather limiting recently. Knives of Andy's construction and others I've seen ( BHK boat-tail Scandi for ex.) have peaked my interest greatly. I like knives as tools to be properly used and cared for and the grind/heat treat issue thing I think is not a problem as I've read in recent BRKT threads and such. I think a lot of people push their knives beyond what's considered "normal" use ; even to the point of abuse.
Back to my original thought: Is the lack of a rear handle swell something that has proven it's virtue to you , and also , would the Recluse most likely serve me well as a general woods/survival knife? My uses are generally camping, bush survival , woods-bumming and such. I do not hunt much anymore , so I doubt it would see meat. Any feedback on my post would be greatly appreciated.
Pete
I own mostly factory knives ( Only one custom actually, A Skookum BT) I am approaching the end ( Ha Ha ) of my knife aquisition as I have way too much money accumulated in knives. I have trouble deciding on my next knife recently and my criteria is getting,shall I say, more precise. I have always thought of the handle swell as a good feature, "locking" in my grip , but have started to find it rather limiting recently. Knives of Andy's construction and others I've seen ( BHK boat-tail Scandi for ex.) have peaked my interest greatly. I like knives as tools to be properly used and cared for and the grind/heat treat issue thing I think is not a problem as I've read in recent BRKT threads and such. I think a lot of people push their knives beyond what's considered "normal" use ; even to the point of abuse.
Back to my original thought: Is the lack of a rear handle swell something that has proven it's virtue to you , and also , would the Recluse most likely serve me well as a general woods/survival knife? My uses are generally camping, bush survival , woods-bumming and such. I do not hunt much anymore , so I doubt it would see meat. Any feedback on my post would be greatly appreciated.
Pete