Though this is my first post,I've been reading past posts over the past couple of months trying to find info regarding a heavy-duty folder,with the Al Mar SERE 2000 and the large Sebenza being the two leading choices.I finally ordered the SERE a couple of weeks ago,and have had time to compare it to a friend's Sebenza.
The two knives are very similar in many respects.They both have a
closed length of 4 3/4" and take up about the same space in a pants
pocket.Both knives allow tip up carry,and though the Sebenza is about
1 1/2 oz. lighter,this makes little difference when using a pocket clip.The AL Mar has a slightly longer blade,3 5/8 vs.3 1/2,is slightly
thicker,.140 vs..125",but the Sebenza's blade is about 1/8" wider.I don't believe comparing the blade shape or grind gives either knife a
real advantage over the other.The handles being the same length are also quite similar in shape.The only real difference is the SERE handles are textured G-10,which would allow more security,especially
when wet.Both knives use a high quality blade material,and certainly
the Al Mar's use of VG-10 cannot be faulted.Perhaps the critical factor is the Sebenza's Titanium Integral frame lock,which most users
believe to be the best available design,but the SERE steel liner lock
is very robust,locking up with a definite certainty.
I guess the bottom line is that the large Sebenza weighs a little
less and has a slightly superior locking design.But is it really worth
almost 3 times the money($120 vs.$340)??It seems that something like the law of diminishing returns applies in this comparison.To get a knife that is only very marginally superior requires one to spend substantially more money.Should the Sebenza costs almost 3 times the
SERE 2000?Is one knife under-priced,or one over-priced?Your thoughtful
comments are welcome.
The two knives are very similar in many respects.They both have a
closed length of 4 3/4" and take up about the same space in a pants
pocket.Both knives allow tip up carry,and though the Sebenza is about
1 1/2 oz. lighter,this makes little difference when using a pocket clip.The AL Mar has a slightly longer blade,3 5/8 vs.3 1/2,is slightly
thicker,.140 vs..125",but the Sebenza's blade is about 1/8" wider.I don't believe comparing the blade shape or grind gives either knife a
real advantage over the other.The handles being the same length are also quite similar in shape.The only real difference is the SERE handles are textured G-10,which would allow more security,especially
when wet.Both knives use a high quality blade material,and certainly
the Al Mar's use of VG-10 cannot be faulted.Perhaps the critical factor is the Sebenza's Titanium Integral frame lock,which most users
believe to be the best available design,but the SERE steel liner lock
is very robust,locking up with a definite certainty.
I guess the bottom line is that the large Sebenza weighs a little
less and has a slightly superior locking design.But is it really worth
almost 3 times the money($120 vs.$340)??It seems that something like the law of diminishing returns applies in this comparison.To get a knife that is only very marginally superior requires one to spend substantially more money.Should the Sebenza costs almost 3 times the
SERE 2000?Is one knife under-priced,or one over-priced?Your thoughtful
comments are welcome.