- Joined
- May 9, 2002
- Messages
- 12,260
I don't mind softer steels simply because I can fix boo boos in them faster/easier.
For me, super steels are academic. I like what they offer on paper, I appreciate the strengths that they bring to the table, and I understand the short comings of dealing with a harder steel. Even still, a 204P Ultratech is in my pocket as I type. I doubt I'll ever need to sharpen it even though it sports what I would consider just a mediocre level of sharpness simply because it does what I require of an EDC and I don't anticipate using it to skin a moose this afternoon. It should hold its edge forever as long as I don't bang it into a hard staple or counter top with just the occasional stropping. For me, Super Steels are just convenience things.
Now, if I were dropped into the forest for an extended period of time, I think I would rather have a soft 1095 57 hardness knife and an Arkansas stone over a super steel. I can fix dings over chips and can work a hair popping edge with a found rock if we are going down that tired old rabbit hole.
In short, soft or super, I maintain my carry tools weekly, so I notice no great difference. Both have pros and cons, and the superiority of said steel is actually not that high on my list of "needs" when considering a purchase. I'm much more interested in lock up/toughness/and fit over how high end the steel is.
For me, super steels are academic. I like what they offer on paper, I appreciate the strengths that they bring to the table, and I understand the short comings of dealing with a harder steel. Even still, a 204P Ultratech is in my pocket as I type. I doubt I'll ever need to sharpen it even though it sports what I would consider just a mediocre level of sharpness simply because it does what I require of an EDC and I don't anticipate using it to skin a moose this afternoon. It should hold its edge forever as long as I don't bang it into a hard staple or counter top with just the occasional stropping. For me, Super Steels are just convenience things.
Now, if I were dropped into the forest for an extended period of time, I think I would rather have a soft 1095 57 hardness knife and an Arkansas stone over a super steel. I can fix dings over chips and can work a hair popping edge with a found rock if we are going down that tired old rabbit hole.
In short, soft or super, I maintain my carry tools weekly, so I notice no great difference. Both have pros and cons, and the superiority of said steel is actually not that high on my list of "needs" when considering a purchase. I'm much more interested in lock up/toughness/and fit over how high end the steel is.