- Joined
- Dec 27, 2010
- Messages
- 6,852
Thanks. I can indeed see it now. Beautiful blade. Thanks for sharing!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
CF, Perhaps the file was too large, though it was only 82K. I resized it and it seems to work now, just so small you can barely see it.
View attachment 558057
Wrong ! Japanese swordsmith's are allowed to make and sell two Katana per month, along with wakizashi, tanto and kogatana.They make one to two swords, which are almost all ONLY going to be displayed in japan.
Wrong ! They don't make a living by not selling them.It's not that they frown on americans buying them, it's that NO ONE gets to buy them in a real sense.
Wrong !!!In short, unless you become an immensely wealthy, connected, and respected individual in Japan, you aren't getting one made for you.
Wrong!Unfortunately, historical katanas are themselves scarce
Wrong, wrong and wrong !!!During WW2, the japanese military issued katanas to its officers, and rather than make them (being under trade embargoes and at war) the government had families give up their swords for the military's use. Most of these swords didn't fit the specifications for the modern officer's sword, so they were often cut down, and the ones that weren't in good enough shape to be used were melted down and made into new swords.
Wow, what a wealth of misinformation contained in your post. Where do you people come from ??
Hope your PHD isn't related to Japanese history Jack.
Hey, here's an idea, instead of being a dickhat, why don't you explain what I got wrong and then provide the alternative (and hopefully correct) information?
That way, everybody gets to learn something! You get all the satisfaction of telling someone you know more than they do, and you educate them and other users in the correct information. Then, people congratulate or even thank you for responding, instead of just saying "wow, what an asshole"
No offense, but frankly that is exactly why I posted my reply, your statements were just so ridicules.Therefore, if I'm wrong, I'd certainly like to know about it, so that I don't continue to operate under misconceptions. Saying blatantly incorrect stuff to someone who knows better tends to make you sound like a complete idiot, and I frankly don't prefer to be perceived that way.
Again, I am under no obligation to "show" you anything. Nor, do I have any concerns regarding what you or anyone thinks of me. But most here, I think would tell you that they respect my input and contributions to this section. You have been a member here for how long ? Oh, less than a month, with a total of 11 posts.Since I'm sure you're much the same, at least in the way of not wanting to look like an idiot, I invite you to SHOW me where I've gone wrong.
Common sense would dictate that an artisan can not sustain himself or family if unable to sell his works.They make one to two swords, which are almost all ONLY going to be displayed in japan. It's not that they frown on americans buying them, it's that NO ONE gets to buy them in a real sense.
This incorrect. Swords are not cheap, but they can be had by anyone with the money to pay for one.In short, unless you become an immensely wealthy, connected, and respected individual in Japan, you aren't getting one made for you.
I will say that as you were not specific in your idea of what constitutes historical, our thoughts could be vastly different. Here are links to a few of what I would call historical.Unfortunately, historical katanas are themselves scarce
The Japanese did produce swords to issue to it's military. Many were mass produced and not made in the traditional manner, yet there were facilities which did make traditional swords for the military. The Minatogawa shrine made traditional swords for the Navy and the Yasukuni shrine made traditional swords for the Army.During WW2, the Japanese military issued katanas to its officers, and rather than make them (being under trade embargoes and at war) the government had families give up their swords for the military's use. Most of these swords didn't fit the specifications for the modern officer's sword, so they were often cut down, and the ones that weren't in good enough shape to be used were melted down and made into new swords.
I do! Thanks!See what a nice guy I am.
Regards,
Mr. Dickhat
Wait a minute.
You are using the internet to communicate misinformation, when it is just as easy to find the CORRECT information using that same internet....
...You made yourself a "dickhat" by imperiously spouting off your incorrectitudes....and the onus isn't on SC to correct your mistakes, but he can(and certainly did) call you out on it....
...Dr. Buckaroo Banzai.....seriously??The '80's called...they want their Smallberries back.
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson
While both of you chose to say "here's a new user who says something I take issue with, let me show off how I am superior" he had an altogether better response than you. He merely accused me of being ignorant. You, on the other hand, have decided to say, "How dare you be annoyed at the behavior of a longer-time member! YOU NEED TO BE QUIET UNTIL YOU'VE BEEN HERE LONGER". Lemme just say, that's exceedingly arrogant. I pass the hat of phalluses to you, sir.
As for the last thing... Bite me. Its a big damn joke, and I'm sorry you dont think Buckaroo Banzai is funny, but I and a good number of people still do.
I don't like Thundercats or Gumball, but I don't get pissy when somebody makes a reference to either of them
Even if gumball does get weirdly sexual at times. Seriously, do 5-9 yr olds REALLY need an 30minute discussion on the finer points of infidelity and polyamory?![]()
I have several issues with this statement:Looking back at other stuff, the information I put down is correct, except further investigation has led me to believe that the source of said information had misunderstood something said in a documentary on the subject.
Ahhh, the most correct statement you have made since your unsolicited and unqualified entry into this thread.I did not make myself a dickhat with my original post, I revealed myself as ignorant or misinformed.
No question, my reply was "matter of fact", as I felt your statements deserved. My replies were very clear and to the point.When the good captain whiskey (SC) made his initial response to my post, he did so in a rather rude manner.
You seem to have an extravagant desire to justify your shortcomings which results in you missing the point completely.i'd like to address the two responses, yours and that of SouthernComfort. While both of you chose to say "here's a new user who says something I take issue with, let me show off how I am superior" He merely accused me of being ignorant. You, on the other hand, have decided to say, "How dare you be annoyed at the behavior of a longer-time member! YOU NEED TO BE QUIET UNTIL YOU'VE BEEN HERE LONGER". Lemme just say, that's exceedingly arrogant.