- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 3,355
I feel, for some reason I can't fully explain, that I'm at a point where I should choose a direction for my knife collecting. To this point I've tried to sample a lot of different things in custom knives. If I didn't have a piece by a certain maker I might make it a priority to get something from them. Part of it was to see what was what among different makers. My sense of what I like and why I like it has developed quite a bit in the past few years, and while it will continue to develop with exposure to new things, I think I've set my taste in knives for the most part.
In my mind I see a choice between two paths.
#1 is to keep trying to acquire knives from as many makers as I can and to keep trying to look for stuff that I don't have an example of (for example, getting a Bob Terzuola knife because I think it would be a great knife and I don't have one yet, the same thing could go for Kit Carson and dozens more makers).
#2 is to set out the makers I already own and know that I like (Lightfoot, Mayo, Hinderer, Sibert, Chuck Gedraitis and others) and focus mainly on collecting more pieces from them. This wouldn't necessarily be done to the exclusion of getting pieces from makers that would be new to me, so to speak, but expanding on the makers I already have would take up the majority of the time and money devoted to knives.
Has anyone else ever made a choice like this or felt a similar way? Am I perhaps premature in feeling like I should make such a choice? Am I missing something with the two choices I've described? Are there options 3, 4 and 5 that I should think about?
I appreciate any comments anyone may offer.
In my mind I see a choice between two paths.
#1 is to keep trying to acquire knives from as many makers as I can and to keep trying to look for stuff that I don't have an example of (for example, getting a Bob Terzuola knife because I think it would be a great knife and I don't have one yet, the same thing could go for Kit Carson and dozens more makers).
#2 is to set out the makers I already own and know that I like (Lightfoot, Mayo, Hinderer, Sibert, Chuck Gedraitis and others) and focus mainly on collecting more pieces from them. This wouldn't necessarily be done to the exclusion of getting pieces from makers that would be new to me, so to speak, but expanding on the makers I already have would take up the majority of the time and money devoted to knives.
Has anyone else ever made a choice like this or felt a similar way? Am I perhaps premature in feeling like I should make such a choice? Am I missing something with the two choices I've described? Are there options 3, 4 and 5 that I should think about?
I appreciate any comments anyone may offer.