I think the confusion is that I asked about the angles being not correct because of the guides use the primary grind as their reference rather than an absolute reference of the center line of the blade. I explained how I saw this as a problem and asked for opinions. Almost nobody addressed the issue and either became insulting and condescending and attacked that I said "It also means, to me, that the Work Sharp machines are not worth considering." This sentence was just one part of the whole post but some seem to have fixated on this like it was my whole point or question. The whole post was the premise that I used in saying that.
I am looking for an answer about the angles not being held correctly, and if this is the case then recommendations to buy something else would be not an answer. If the premise that angles are being held correctly is wrong, then say so. Don't tell me to buy more stuff or something else as proof that I wrong. It is completely illogical.
If I had already made up my mind about buying one, why would I ask if I am wrong about how I see the design?
Actually you made a couple of statements about the guides, not questions.
I dislike the guides but not for the reasons you mention. My issue with them is that you cannot sharpen the entire length of the blade of knives that have scales. Also that over time they promote a divot at the handle end of the blade (my experience - may be poor technique, others may differ).
The point is that whether you are correct or not, the guides are not a reason to discount the WS. I have owned just about every system on the market including the original WS, WE, KME, EP, SM, Lansky and all the usual suspects. The WSKO with BGA is the only system I have not sold.
If you choose to discount the WS because of the guides, so be it, but you may be missing its full potential.