With a 4" blade the 446 Goliath mentioned by @HolyRoller above was Bucks largest folding knife (excluding fillets).
I have a very large hand running 2X/3X and find the 110 a nice fit. Any larger and I would be thinking about a fixed blade.
Not directly the point of the discussion but wonder about carry size limits in some jurisdictions.
S Slice unfortunately where we live I believe a 4 inch blade is all we can carry, Western MA maybe they are a little more easy on ya but south shore -not so muchWow never owned this large model. The idea is growing on me... perhaps a little more blade and handle could be useful to the large dude crowd, myself included.
I don’t think the extra weight would be a problem for ol’ Goliath over there. His shoelaces probably weigh more than the extra knife length!I find the concept of a larger 110 interesting.
Would the brass frame be limiting there? Is it rigid enough to extend an inch or so? Could get real heavy though so may want a different frame material........
Interesting.
I'll preface this by saying I fully understand how important the 110 is to the industry and knife buyers in general. I know the history and I have respect for the model and it's provenance. That said...
According to a few retailers the Buck 110 is 8.5 inches long when open. I am a giant with enormous hands. Despite the knife having decent ergos, I need about another inch of real estate overall. Please keep in mind this is solely for discussion's sake; I am not suggesting Buck should change anything. I also realize I'm the only gigantor here.
Regardless, would you at least be interested in an XXL 110 Hunter?