BTW Spyderco usually switch steels to higher level. Benchmade makes the same. The prices are getting higher. But the knives are becoming better also (well, mostly).
That move from CS...well, I don't understand that.
AUS-10 is a higher grade steel than BD1, BD1 is very similar in performance to AUS-8 (with many reports showing it having lower edge retention). AUS-10 is of course two whole AUSes better.CS guys, fire your marketing dept ars$%^le. Otherways we will see upgrade to 420HC by the end of the year.
And stop taking your clients as a morons. Switch from CTS-XHP to S35VN, BD1 to AUS10 IS a DOWNGRADE! Period!
BD1 is very similar in performance to AUS-8 (with many reports showing it having lower edge retention).
Now XHP is similar, it's a slightly higher grade steel in terms of edge retention compared to S35VN, but a little less tough.
I would trust Ankerson's testing results a little more. He has a bit more scientific method to his testing. My super unscientific testing on cutting random crap, mainly cardboard, has mirrored his results pretty decently.This one is definitely false. They are NOT equal. Try Cedric yt channel. he tested BD1 and got different results. Similar to what people feel using it. Its way better than AUS8.
I won't agree with this statement either, sir. Maybe on paper they are equal, but not in real life usage.
They are just another data point. I use them both. One is done one way the other another. You probably should not take sides. Use them both as data points. I also use cliff stamps data too. And there are more Russian guys on YouTube that also have some charts and different ways of doing cut tests. Ankerson only does sic to 400 grit on edge pro. Cedric does work sharp edge and lansky edges. It's just more data.I would trust Ankerson's testing results a little more. He has a bit more scientific method to his testing. My super unscientific testing on cutting random crap, mainly cardboard, has mirrored his results pretty decently.
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads...ed-on-edge-retention-cutting-5-8-rope.793481/
He says in the category grouping that for those he sharpens up to 3k, for the bottom testing with exact numbers of cuts he does 400 SiCThey are just another data point. I use them both. One is done one way the other another. You probably should not take sides. Use them both as data points. I also use cliff stamps data too. And there are more Russian guys on YouTube that also have some charts and different ways of doing cut tests. Ankerson only does sic to 400 grit on edge pro. Cedric does work sharp edge and lansky edges. It's just more data.
Carpenter and Crucible are both US steel manufacturers. They switched from XHP because availability wasn't terribly good on it, but everybody and their grandma has access to nearly limitless supplies of S30V and S35VN, and S35VN is cheaper to machine.now steel composition wise I do not pay much attention. through cutting tests on limbs, branches , wood, produce, and maintenance tasks, xhp outperforms s35vn by far. no micro chipping. I'm wondering if political moves in regards to world trade may have something to do with CS's recent steel changes? With that being said, I'm holding on to and stocking up on US steel knives by CS.