Top-shelf info here, guys. Thanks!
Loved using the perfectly good sharper than mine "return" Fiddlebacks that made the second half of my try stick 1000% easier. Going to featherstick my office desk and lay snares and traps around the office to see what I can catch over the next few weeks. Also kind of jittery I haven't been able to burn anything for a couple days.
This is great!
Regarding your first sentence, when you say "return" do you mean "borrowed" Fiddlebacks, or something else?
Looking forward to practicing some skills in real life.....retied 4 pairs of shoes at 8 year old soccer practice with my daughter last evening and not 1 knot came undone. Woohoo!
There ya go.
To touch on your last point. I mostly used my Bushfinger for everything though I did borrow and try out a couple others. Overall I was pleased with the Bushfinger. However, something that stood out was how much better a scandi knife felt for the wood working tasks when we were working on various 'cuts' by making 'try sticks'. The scandi, as it's designed for, just seemed to catch that wood a bit better and I felt like I had a little more control than I did with the convex. It could also be related to the knife size. The Scandi I tried was a Hiking Buddy.
I plan on getting a scandi of my own at some point here.
Thanks, Odaon-- I appreciate your response. The Bushfinger pattern is on my radar as a 'bigger' knife (On Beyond Pocketses), and I was wondering if anyone made a go of one over the week end.
You also addressed one of my other ongoing wonderings: who prefers Scandi over flat/convex grinds, and on what knives and/or in what application? That, and: does anyone actually
prefer SFT over TT if given the choice...?
pertinux
Hey P, talking about which knives I used is a much easier question for me to chime in on at the moment rather than talk about the experience of the weekend, what I learned and what I took away from the experience.
Ah, good! I was thinking it might afford more concrete 'purchase' for some, and I'm glad if it did-- especially since the subject fascinates me. Thank you for all you've written out here.
FF Shaman 3/32 - This was a knife I wanted the first time I saw the profile and as soon as I saw the handle material I liked I jumped on it. In comparison to any other Fiddleback, the Shaman's blocky appearance sets it apart and tends to visually give the look of utility. Well, I can tell you first hand this knife is the world's finest "utility" box cutting tool you could ever own. In 3/32 it is very "slicey" and the upsweep towards the tip accentuates the slicing ability. the commando, more blocky handle of the knife is very neutral in hand and amazingly comfortable in any grip you can put it in.
Aha-- 'neutral in hand'. A more elegant (and efficient) way of stating, "My hand doesn't like to be told where to go.... " As I typically end up doing.
Your endorsement has me looking again at Shaman pictures! I'm still ambivalent about its appearance and have not yet figured out if/how it fits
for me relative to other knives of similar size. Straightforward utility is always compelling, however, and you have certainly drawn my attention to the pattern.
FF Bush Hermit 1/8 - My all time favorite Fiddleback visually and to use. Everything about the BH is made for optimal performance. It is the Ford GT of the FF lineup. for my hands, the slightly taller profile of the BH over the Bushfinger gives the knife a wholly different feel and by going taller and not so much wider it provides for me added control and comfort, especially with use over a long period of time.
I'm thinking the BH is More than I'd keen to-- I don't believe my hand would benefit from the extra height in a model already in the upper size range for me-- but am newly curious about the comparison you've drawn here with the Bushfinger.
Thanks!
~ P.