Ban of Rosewood, Cocobolo, et al---Effect on Traditionals?

.....it is unfortunate for us for obvious reasons - but it is not crazy.

The merciless and commercial rape of hardwoods of all sorts, especially the more beautiful like these, is utterly rampant across the world.

Added to all that is the collateral damage to many, many other species.

Would that mankind could have foreseen this years ago and put measures in to practice - some woods will become the modern day Rhino

And, sadly, how can one prove - if there was a way - that you're using a wood from a 'sustainable source'. Tricky.

I hope there's a way...

I read back in the 90’s that in the country of Bhutan harvesting wood from any living tree(ie cutting rather than collecting from naturally fallen trees) carried such a severe penalty—and more importantly had broad public support—such that there was no or almost no illegal timber trade at the time. I don’t know if this is still the case or not.
I think a single tree fallen from a lightning strike could provide enough handles for as many knives as demand would require.
I also agree that hardwoods are more precious resource standing than cut to nubs and replaced by pines.
 
Oh dear i have inbound a GEC #38 Special with Exotic Mexican Bocote Wood covers, tracking tells me it is in Chicago at this time, now i shall be all of a quiver until it reaches me, i doubt the customs would inform the recipient of its of its seizure so it is fingers crossed this week.
 
Even more simplistic - It costs me @$100 for FWS clearance to bring in a package with 50 Stag LionSteel Roundhead models. Then it would cost $100/package to legally send them back outside the U.S. one at a time.

Most dealers simply don't declare these components and hope they never get picked for random search. But customs is starting to work more closely with FWS - and when they do catch them, it is going to be very expensive. As much as customers love to post their "mail call" these days - it is just a matter of time. Not to mention simple sting operations wherein a Canadian customer orders a stag knife from every dealer and then hands the tracking number to FWS to collect a reward. FWS may even wait months to file the charges in order to get as many as possible before word of mouth gets out. Or if a dealer wants less competition - just place some orders and have knives sent to bogus European addresses just to turn the tracking over to FWS themselves...
The fear factor. I pretty much don't recognize CITES' authority worldwide. That of course doesn't mean much since who the hell am I? But I do recognize that one needs to use natural resources wisely and that includes elephant ivory. China are you paying attention?
 
The fear factor. I pretty much don't recognize CITES' authority worldwide.

I pretty much don't recognize the seat belt laws either ;)
Still illegal, still can be a detriment to my well being.

CITES seems like a weird bird as they will let the source countries place species on the lists. And I guess our duty is to trust the source countries know the status of their resources. But I do agree that customers and dealers have to view it a bit differently.
 
Ask the guys at Gibson Guitars what happens when you dont follow the rules. I am not saying any of this is good, bad or otherwise, but it makes you reevaluate how you do business when armed federal marshals confiscate your property and shut you down.
 
Last edited:
Here's how we deal with it. Bottom line of the description in red.

http://www.horsewrightclothing.com/California-Coyote-Bubinga_p_1028.html

Net result, an importer of hardwoods can still import these woods. They will recoup that fee, I will pay more, you will pay more and it limits my sales. Will it work, doubt it. Will it work, hope so. Are there tree species that need protecting? Absolutely. I'm just instinctually distrustful of this type of thing. I'm a little shy of rousing success stories.
 
Even more simplistic - It costs me @$100 for FWS clearance to bring in a package with 50 Stag LionSteel Roundhead models. Then it would cost $100/package to legally send them back outside the U.S. one at a time.

Most dealers simply don't declare these components and hope they never get picked for random search. But customs is starting to work more closely with FWS - and when they do catch them, it is going to be very expensive. As much as customers love to post their "mail call" these days - it is just a matter of time. Not to mention simple sting operations wherein a Canadian customer orders a stag knife from every dealer and then hands the tracking number to FWS to collect a reward. FWS may even wait months to file the charges in order to get as many as possible before word of mouth gets out. Or if a dealer wants less competition - just place some orders and have knives sent to bogus European addresses just to turn the tracking over to FWS themselves...

I have encountered this already from the standpoint of a customer. I wanted to buy an Otter knife that was only available from a European seller. Due to it's African Blackwood handle, they had to add on the fee. It made the knife too expensive for me to buy.

Oh dear i have inbound a GEC #38 Special with Exotic Mexican Bocote Wood covers, tracking tells me it is in Chicago at this time, now i shall be all of a quiver until it reaches me, i doubt the customs would inform the recipient of its of its seizure so it is fingers crossed this week.

As far as I know, bocote is not affected by this.
 
All rosewoods are under the restrictions, even bubinga which is called a rosewood even though it’s not. Includes cocobolo, Kingwood, African Blackwood and many many more. It’s not ban or outlawing of the woods. It is a legal convention that makes it so that wood exported has to have papers that is was legally harvested and exported. But there are a few that really can’t be moved around, Brazilian rosewood being one. For the rest it’s complicated and expensive as noted above for the end users, us, if we want to travel with some items, or sell outside our country, no papers on the rosewood it can get seized and possible legal problems.

The reason is China. They have a big market for rosewood furniture and other items. A billion people came into money, wanted rosewood and are buying every stick of rosewood. Caused lots of illegal cutting, gangs got into it, etc. The demand is wiping out some species. So the restrictions.

Wood in country is not effected. Once that gets used up, then we won’t see much and it will be expensive. I love rosewood on knives, so I am not happy about the situation.
 
I guess that makes my little Queen Trapper that much more special. The rosewood handles are beautiful, and I guess getting rare.

 
Last edited:
One more thing - Ebony is heading the same direction as the Rosewoods. If the source countries do not get a hand on how it’s being cut soon it will be gone.

Taylor guitars supposedly bought up a big chunk of the African ebony logging rights to manage sustainably (or corner the market depending on what you read).
 
Thanks for setting me right, perhaps it was the Exotic in the description that threw me. I will try and post a picture when it lands.



As far as I know, bocote is not affected by this.[/QUOTE]
 
[QUOTE="seabil, post: 18359242, member: 415212]
...
The reason is China.... [/QUOTE]

And there it is in one little sentence.

It is not just tropical hardwoods and rhino horn viagra that they are trashing.

In the US, we are witnessing the extinction of an entire species of our native hardwood - the ash. All because of a little chinese bug called the emerald ash borer.

It came over here in wood pallets used to ship their cheap garbage because they are too cheap or corrupt, or both, to follow the quarantine and treatment rules we have in place.

A good illustration of how ineffective these well-intentioned regulations are when people just don’t give a damn.

Just because of the extinction of the beautiful ash tree, I am trying to not buy anything made in china. It’s not easy, but maybe more effective than not buying a cocobolo GEC.
 
I did not know that the ash was under threat of extinction. I know the major guitar companies producing guitars in the US a few years ago using ash have switched to other hardwoods. I still really believe that hardwoods should be harvested only when sustainable. We’re still using wild Tiger skins to make leather jackets, in a manner of speaking. Turning any more of our forests into savanna or grasslands(we’ve already lost 92%) is condemnable—whoever does it, there’s no reason for doing so.
 
Ash is one thing and the ash borer has been killing them for a good while. I first ran into the borers in the early 80's. American Hemlock is slowly being killed off. At one time, it was a significant tree used for the lumber industry in the US. American Chestnut is mostly gone for the same reasons.

The problem like African Elephants is who owns the land or lives near the land often are hand to mouth in terms of surviving. The other obviously is poaching whether it be timber or animals. I have seen walnut trees poached as well as black cherry.
 
Ash is one thing and the ash borer has been killing them for a good while. I first ran into the borers in the early 80's. American Hemlock is slowly being killed off. At one time, it was a significant tree used for the lumber industry in the US.

The problem like African Elephants is who owns the land or lives near the land often are hand to mouth in terms of surviving. The other obviously is poaching whether it be timber or animals. I have seen walnut trees poached as well as black cherry.

At this stage of our civilization, these resources are precious enough that the people who really live near them should be aware that they are worth more standing than used for firewood. Poaching of hardwoods for sale are not done by either the poor or the locals in nearly every case. Most poaching is done out of greed. The locals are too afraid to stand up to groups of heavily armed bandits, with good reason. Poaching a deer out of season to feed ones family is not wrong, as far as I’m concerned, but destroying a healthy part of the canopy is IMO. Tigers were nearly extinct by the 1970’s in most of the world, but once ranchers in Russia and elsewhere were convinced that Tigers have no adverse impact on livestock, and actually prevent wolves(which do have an impact) from establishing residence they have been able to survive a few decades more. But Wild tigers need forest, something which we are still destroying in favor of grazing land, so I doubt if they will be around for another 40 years.
 
Back
Top